Clemente Filipe Manuel, Ramirez-Campillo Rodrigo, Castillo Daniel, Raya-González Javier, Rico-González Markel, Oliveira Rafael, Rosemann Thomas, Knechtle Beat
Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal.
Biol Sport. 2022 Sep;39(3):765-778. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.107484. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
Plyometric jump training (PJT) can be used for improving balance through bilateral and unilateral jump-landing drills. Since the increased number of articles testing the effects of PJT on dynamic and static balance, it is relevant to summarize the evidence and determine the effects across different original articles. This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effects of PJT programs on dynamic and static balance in soccer players. The data sources utilized were Cochrane, Medline (PubMed), SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. (i) Soccer players of any age or sex without injury, illness, or other clinical conditions; (ii) PJT-based programs restricted to a minimum of three weeks (duration); (iii) passive or active control groups; (iv) pre-post interventions values of dynamic and/or static balance; (v) randomized-controlled trials; and (vi) peerreviewed original full-text studies written in English, Portuguese, and/or Spanish. The database search initially identified 803 titles. From those, eight articles were eligible for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed no significant differences between PJT and active controls in dynamic anterior, postero-medial, or postero-lateral balance for both left and right legs (p > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were found between PJT and active controls in terms of static balance (p = 0.495). The current evidence suggests that PJT has no significant advantage over active control groups in terms of dynamic or static balance.
增强式跳跃训练（PJT）可通过双侧和单侧跳跃落地训练来改善平衡能力。鉴于测试PJT对动态和静态平衡影响的文章数量不断增加，总结相关证据并确定不同原始文章中的影响是很有必要的。本系统评价及荟萃分析旨在评估PJT计划对足球运动员动态和静态平衡的影响。所使用的数据来源有考克兰图书馆、医学期刊数据库（PubMed）、体育科学数据库和科学网。（i）任何年龄或性别的足球运动员，无损伤、疾病或其他临床状况；（ii）基于PJT的计划，持续时间至少为三周；（iii）被动或主动对照组；（iv）动态和/或静态平衡的干预前后值；（v）随机对照试验；（vi）经同行评审的英文、葡萄牙文和/或西班牙文原创全文研究。数据库搜索最初识别出803个标题。其中，有八篇文章符合系统评价和荟萃分析的条件。结果显示，在左右腿的动态前向、后内侧或后外侧平衡方面，PJT与主动对照组之间无显著差异（p>0.05）。此外，在静态平衡方面，PJT与主动对照组之间也未发现显著差异（p = 0.495）。目前的证据表明，在动态或静态平衡方面，PJT相对于主动对照组没有显著优势。
