Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, China.
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou, China.
Cognition. 2022 Dec;229:105249. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105249. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
Retaining social interactions in working memory (WM) for further social activities is vital for a successful social life. Researchers have noted a social chunking phenomenon in WM: WM involuntarily uses the social interaction cues embedded in the individual actions and chunks them as one unit. Our study is the first to examine whether the social chunking in WM is an automatic process, by asking whether social chunking of agent actions in WM is resource-demanding, a key hallmark of automaticity. We achieved this by probing whether retaining agent interactions in WM as a chunk required more attention than retaining actions without interaction. We employed a WM change-detection task with actions containing social interaction cues as memory stimuli, and required participants only memorizing individual actions. As domain-general attention and object-based attention are suggested playing a key role in retaining chunks in WM, a secondary task was inserted in the WM maintenance phase to consume these two types of attention. We reestablished the fact that the social chunking in WM required no voluntary control (Experiments 1 and 2). Critically, we demonstrated substantial evidence that social chunking in WM did not require extra domain-general attention (Experiment 1) or object-based attention (Experiment 2). These findings imply that the social chunking of agent actions in WM is not resource-demanding, supporting an automatic view of social chunking in WM.
在工作记忆 (WM) 中保留社交互动以进行进一步的社交活动对于成功的社交生活至关重要。研究人员在 WM 中注意到一种社会组块现象:WM 会不自觉地使用个体行为中嵌入的社交互动线索,并将其作为一个单元进行组块。我们的研究首次通过询问 WM 中主体行为的社会组块是否是一个自动过程来检验 WM 中的社会组块是否是一个自动过程,这是自动性的一个关键标志。我们通过探究在 WM 中保留作为一个组块的主体互动是否比保留没有互动的动作需要更多的注意力来实现这一点。我们使用 WM 变化检测任务,其中包含作为记忆刺激的社交互动线索的动作,并要求参与者仅记忆单个动作。由于域泛注意力和基于对象的注意力被认为在保留 WM 中的组块方面发挥着关键作用,因此在 WM 维持阶段插入了一个次要任务来消耗这两种类型的注意力。我们重新确立了 WM 中的社会组块不需要自愿控制的事实(实验 1 和实验 2)。至关重要的是,我们提供了大量证据表明,WM 中的社会组块不需要额外的域泛注意力(实验 1)或基于对象的注意力(实验 2)。这些发现意味着 WM 中主体行为的社会组块不是资源密集型的,支持 WM 中社会组块的自动观点。