Suppr超能文献

正畸依从性评估:系统评价。

Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Integrated Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 2022 Oct;72(5):597-606. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to determine whether the type of removable appliance, as well as the age and sex of the patient, may affect the extension or reduction of wear time by assessing the correlation between the mean actual and orthodontist-recommended wear times.

METHODS

Randomised case control trials, cohort studies, case series, observational studies, reviews, and retrospective analyses were identified. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were reviewed, and 542 articles were obtained, of which 31 were qualified for qualitative synthesis. The data from 1674 participants were collected and a weighted average was determined for the mean wear time of each appliance.

RESULTS

Regardless of the type of extra- or intraoral appliances, mean wear time was shorter than recommended, although patients using intraoral appliances cooperated more. The best compliance was noted for Schwarz appliances (73.70%) and plate retainers (85%). There was no evidence of an influence of patients' age and sex on compliance during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The considerable inconsistency and imprecision of articles could affect the reliability of the results. Previous studies analysing the effectiveness of treatment with removable appliances based on an arbitrarily assumed average wear time need to be revised in order to verify the actual wear time with the use of microsensors.

摘要

目的

本综述旨在通过评估平均实际佩戴时间与正畸医生推荐佩戴时间之间的相关性,确定可摘矫治器的类型以及患者的年龄和性别是否会影响佩戴时间的延长或缩短。

方法

我们检索了随机对照试验、队列研究、病例系列研究、观察性研究、综述和回顾性分析。使用 Cochrane 协作工具和改良 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评估研究质量。我们检索了 Embase、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 电子数据库,共获得 542 篇文章,其中 31 篇文章符合定性综合的纳入标准。我们收集了 1674 名参与者的数据,并确定了每种矫治器的平均佩戴时间的加权平均值。

结果

无论使用的是口外还是口内矫治器,平均佩戴时间都短于推荐的佩戴时间,尽管使用口内矫治器的患者配合度更高。Schwarz 矫治器(73.70%)和压模保持器(85%)的依从性最好。治疗期间,患者的年龄和性别对依从性没有影响。

结论

大量文章的不一致性和不精确性可能会影响结果的可靠性。为了验证使用微传感器实际佩戴时间,需要修改之前基于任意假设的平均佩戴时间分析可摘矫治器治疗效果的研究。

相似文献

1
Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review.正畸依从性评估:系统评价。
Int Dent J. 2022 Oct;72(5):597-606. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances.可摘矫治器的依从性
Evid Based Dent. 2017 Dec 22;18(4):105-106. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401268.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验