Suppr超能文献

比较电子烟和可燃香烟对大脑尼古丁的摄取。

Comparison of brain nicotine uptake from electronic cigarettes and combustible cigarettes.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.

Department of Radiology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Oct;47(11):1939-1944. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01410-5. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Abstract

Brain accumulation rate and magnitude are critical for the acute reinforcing effects of nicotine. Despite electronic cigarettes' (E-cigs) appeal as substitutes for traditional combustible cigarettes (C-cigs), brain nicotine accumulation (BNA) from E-cigs has not been compared with that from C-cigs using a within-subjects design. BNA was directly assessed with 16 adult dual users (10 females) of E-cigs (e-liquid pH 9.4) and C-cigs, using C-nicotine and positron emission tomography (PET). Participants went through two 15-min head scanning sessions during which they inhaled a single puff of E-cig vapor or C-cig smoke containing C-nicotine in a randomized order. A full-body scan was also conducted at each session to measure total absorbed dose of C-nicotine. Mean maximum concentration (C) and area under curve of BNA were 22.1% and 22.7% lower, respectively, following E-cig compared with C-cig inhalation. Meanwhile, T was 2.7 times longer following inhalation of E-cig vapor relative to C-cig smoke (all ps < 0.005). Whole-body imaging indicated greater nicotine retention in the respiratory tract from vapor versus smoke inhalation (p < 0.0001). Following vapor inhalation, nicotine retention in the respiratory tract was correlated with C values of BNA (r = -0.59, p < 0.02). Our results confirm that E-cigs with alkaline pH e-liquid can deliver nicotine rapidly to the brain, albeit less efficiently than C-cigs partly due to greater airway retention of nicotine. Since brain nicotine uptake mediates reinforcement, these results help elucidate actions of E-cigs in terms of abuse liability and effectiveness in substituting for combustible cigarettes.

摘要

脑内积累率和积累量对尼古丁的急性强化效应至关重要。尽管电子烟作为传统可燃香烟的替代品具有吸引力,但尚未采用个体内设计来比较电子烟和可燃香烟引起的脑内尼古丁积累(BNA)。本研究使用 16 名电子烟(pH 值 9.4 的烟液)和可燃香烟的双重使用者(10 名女性),直接用 C-尼古丁和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)来评估 BNA。参与者在两次 15 分钟的头部扫描过程中,以随机顺序吸入一口电子烟蒸汽或含有 C-尼古丁的可燃香烟烟雾。每次扫描还进行了全身扫描,以测量 C-尼古丁的总吸收剂量。与吸入可燃香烟相比,吸入电子烟后,BNA 的最大浓度(C)和曲线下面积分别降低了 22.1%和 22.7%。同时,与吸入可燃香烟烟雾相比,吸入电子烟蒸汽后 T 延长了 2.7 倍(均 p < 0.005)。全身成像表明,与吸入烟雾相比,蒸汽吸入时尼古丁在呼吸道中的保留更多(p < 0.0001)。吸入蒸汽后,呼吸道中尼古丁的保留与 BNA 的 C 值呈负相关(r = -0.59,p < 0.02)。我们的结果证实,碱性 pH 值烟液的电子烟可以快速将尼古丁输送到大脑,但效率不如可燃香烟,部分原因是尼古丁在气道中的滞留更多。由于脑内尼古丁摄取介导强化,这些结果有助于阐明电子烟在滥用倾向和替代可燃香烟方面的作用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of brain nicotine uptake from electronic cigarettes and combustible cigarettes.比较电子烟和可燃香烟对大脑尼古丁的摄取。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Oct;47(11):1939-1944. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01410-5. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Rapid Brain Nicotine Uptake from Electronic Cigarettes.电子烟快速摄取大脑中的尼古丁。
J Nucl Med. 2020 Jun;61(6):928-930. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.230748. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
7
Transitioning From Cigarettes to Electronic Cigarettes Increases Alcohol Consumption.从香烟转向电子烟会增加酒精消费量。
Subst Use Misuse. 2016 Dec 5;51(14):1838-45. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1197940. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验