Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤患者插管时机的系统评价:院前与院内插管。

A systematic review of the timing of intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury: pre-hospital versus in-hospital intubation.

机构信息

Anaesthetic Department, The Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1FR, UK.

Anaesthetic Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1199-1215. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02048-0. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review was to examine current evidence on the risks versus benefit of pre-hospital intubation when compared with in-hospital intubation in adult patients with traumatic brain injuries.

METHODS

We conducted electronic searches of PubMed, Medline, Embase, CIANHL and the Cochrane library up to March 2021. Data extracted compared mortality, length of hospital and intensive care stay, pneumonia and functional outcomes in traumatic brain injured patients undergoing pre-hospital intubation versus in-hospital intubation. The risk of bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS

Ten studies including 25,766 patients were analysed. Seven were retrospective studies, two prospective cohort studies and one randomised control study. The mean mortality rate in patients who underwent pre-hospital intubation was 44.5% and 31.98% for in-hospital intubation. The odds ratio for an effect of pre-hospital intubation on mortality ranged from 0.31 (favouring in-hospital intubation) to 3.99 (favouring pre-hospital). The overall quality of evidence is low; however, the only randomised control study showed an improved functional outcome for pre-hospital intubation at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence does not support widespread pre-hospital intubation in all traumatic brain injured patients. This does not, however, contradict the need for the intervention when there is severe airway compromise; instead, it must be assessed by experienced personnel if a time critical transfer to hospital is more advantageous. Favourable neurological outcomes highlighted by the randomised control trial favours pre-hospital intubation, but further research is required in this field.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是检查在成人创伤性脑损伤患者中与院内插管相比,院前插管的风险与获益。

方法

我们对 PubMed、Medline、Embase、CIANHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了电子检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 3 月。提取的数据比较了行院前插管与院内插管的创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率、住院和重症监护时间、肺炎和功能结局。使用推荐评估、制定和评估的分级方法评估偏倚风险。

结果

纳入了 10 项研究,共 25766 例患者。7 项为回顾性研究,2 项为前瞻性队列研究,1 项为随机对照研究。行院前插管患者的死亡率平均为 44.5%,而行院内插管的死亡率为 31.98%。院前插管对死亡率影响的优势比范围从 0.31(支持院内插管)到 3.99(支持院前插管)。总的证据质量较低;然而,唯一的随机对照研究显示,院前插管在 6 个月时的功能结局有所改善。

结论

现有证据不支持在所有创伤性脑损伤患者中广泛进行院前插管。然而,这并不否定在存在严重气道阻塞时需要进行该干预措施;相反,如果向医院进行紧急转移更有利,就必须由经验丰富的人员进行评估。随机对照试验强调的有利神经结局有利于院前插管,但该领域还需要进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验