Aging and Aneuploidy Group, IBMC, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022 Oct 21;11(10):1021-1028. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szac059.
Different animal models have been used for hair research and regeneration studies based on the similarities between animal and human skins. Primary knowledge on hair follicle (HF) biology has arisen from research using mouse models baring spontaneous or genetically engineered mutations. These studies have been crucial for the discovery of genes underlying human hair cycle control and hair loss disorders. Yet, researchers have become increasingly aware that there are distinct architectural and cellular features between the mouse and human HFs, which might limit the translation of findings in the mouse models. Thus, it is enticing to reason that the spotlight on mouse models and the unwillingness to adapt to the human archetype have been hampering the emergence of the long-awaited human hair loss cure. Here, we provide an overview of the major limitations of the mainstream mouse models for human hair loss research, and we underpin a future course of action using human cell bioengineered models and the emergent artificial intelligence.
不同的动物模型已被用于毛发研究和再生研究,这是基于动物和人类皮肤之间的相似性。毛囊 (HF) 生物学的基础知识源于使用具有自发或基因工程突变的小鼠模型的研究。这些研究对于发现控制人类毛发周期和脱发疾病的基因至关重要。然而,研究人员越来越意识到,小鼠和人类 HF 之间存在明显的结构和细胞特征,这可能限制了在小鼠模型中发现的结果的转化。因此,人们有理由认为,对小鼠模型的关注以及不愿意适应人类原型,一直阻碍着人们期待已久的脱发治疗方法的出现。在这里,我们提供了主流小鼠模型在人类脱发研究中的主要局限性的概述,并通过使用人类细胞生物工程模型和新兴的人工智能来为未来的行动提供依据。