Mohai Alexandru, Gifford Jack, Herkt Rebecca, Parker Alexia, Toder Aiden, Dixon Dave, Kennedy Ewan
School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, New Zealand.
School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Phys Ther Sport. 2022 Sep;57:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
It can be a challenge for clinicians to evaluate trauma that could represent cervical spine injury, concussion, or both. These conditions share common mechanisms of injury and symptom profiles, yet distinct aetiology and management. In the clinical evaluation of concussion, a range of standardised tools are available but the extent to which such tools include cervical spine evaluation is unclear.
To identify a variety of standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools, examine if these tools include cervical spine evaluation, and describe the characteristics of cervical spine evaluation included. To have an informed discussion about how cervical spine evaluation might best be approached after a concussion event.
Scoping review.
A structured literature search was performed in eight databases to identify standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools. Each tool was then reviewed for cervical spine evaluation, and the characteristics of tools including cervical spine evaluation were described.
The structured search identified 82 standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools. Eleven tools included cervical spine assessment related primarily to the evaluation of red flags and symptoms, just three included physical examination.
Few standardised clinical concussion evaluation tools include cervical spine evaluation, and even fewer include physical examination. Cervical spine evaluation in concussion may benefit from closer alignment with established approaches to screening for clinically significant cervical spine injuries. In concussion, we advocate for an approach to cervical spine evaluation that includes screening for dangerous mechanisms of injury, neurological deficit, distracting injury and neck pain; and physical examination of neck range of motion and neck tenderness.
对于临床医生而言,评估可能代表颈椎损伤、脑震荡或两者皆有的创伤可能是一项挑战。这些情况具有共同的损伤机制和症状特征,但病因和管理方法各不相同。在脑震荡的临床评估中,有一系列标准化工具可用,但这些工具在多大程度上包括颈椎评估尚不清楚。
识别各种标准化的临床脑震荡评估工具,检查这些工具是否包括颈椎评估,并描述所包括的颈椎评估的特征。就是否最好在脑震荡事件后进行颈椎评估展开明智的讨论。
范围综述。
在八个数据库中进行结构化文献检索,以识别标准化的临床脑震荡评估工具。然后对每个工具进行颈椎评估审查,并描述包括颈椎评估的工具的特征。
结构化检索识别出82种标准化的临床脑震荡评估工具。11种工具包括主要与红旗征和症状评估相关的颈椎评估,只有3种包括体格检查。
很少有标准化的临床脑震荡评估工具包括颈椎评估,包括体格检查的更少。脑震荡中的颈椎评估可能受益于与既定的筛查具有临床意义的颈椎损伤方法更紧密的结合。在脑震荡中,我们提倡一种颈椎评估方法,包括筛查危险的损伤机制、神经功能缺损、分散注意力的损伤和颈部疼痛;以及对颈部活动范围和颈部压痛进行体格检查。