• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Protecting our Patients and Trainees: The Complex Consequences of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Ruling.

作者信息

Ponce Sara Beltrán, Bajaj Amishi, Baniel Claire, Seldon Crystal, Sim Austin, Franco Idalid, Pinnix Chelsea, Fields Emma, Jimenez Rachel B

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Nov 1;114(3):393-395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1846. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1846
PMID:35963469
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Protecting our Patients and Trainees: The Complex Consequences of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Ruling.保护我们的患者和实习生：多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案裁决的复杂后果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Nov 1;114(3):393-395. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1846. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
Associations between state policies, race, ethnicity and rurality, and maternal mortality and morbidity following the United States Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling.美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案作出裁决后，州政策、种族、族裔、农村地区与孕产妇死亡率和发病率之间的关联。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;129(6):e145-e147. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
3
Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.医学人类学学会就最高法院多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的声明
Med Anthropol Q. 2022 Dec;36(4):433-441. doi: 10.1111/maq.12741. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
4
Implications of United States Supreme Court's ruling on Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organization: perspective of physicians caring for critically ill fetuses and newborns.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;60(6):812-813. doi: 10.1002/uog.26107. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案裁决前后，美国30个州通过在线远程医疗提供自我管理药物流产的申请情况。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1768-1770. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18865.
6
Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案对医疗保健劳动力的影响。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2747-2750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6. Epub 2024 May 22.
7
The Court is ignoring science.法院无视科学。
Science. 2022 May 20;376(6595):779. doi: 10.1126/science.adc9968. Epub 2022 May 16.
8
: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion.损害公众健康，助长生殖胁迫。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(3):485-489. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.137. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
9
Protecting marginalized women's mental health in the post-Dobbs era.在后多布斯时代保护边缘化女性的心理健康。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 4;119(40):e2212012119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212012119. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
10
Attitudes Among Society of Women in Urology Members Toward Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.美国泌尿外科女性协会成员对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的态度。
Urology. 2023 Oct;180:295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.044. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
SUPPORT: SUrvey of Parental Leave POlicies of RadiaTion Oncology Programs and Residency Applicants.支持：放射肿瘤学项目和住院医师申请人的育儿假政策调查。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;8(4):101207. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101207. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.