• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法院无视科学。

The Court is ignoring science.

机构信息

Diana Greene Foster is a professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and director of research at Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2022 May 20;376(6595):779. doi: 10.1126/science.adc9968. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.1126/science.adc9968
PMID:35575724
Abstract

A recently leaked draft opinion indicated that the US Supreme Court is prepared to overturn as early as next month in the matter of . In doing so, the Justices won't just be disregarding decades of precedent. They'll also be disregarding ample evidence of abortion's positive impact on patients' health and well-being.

摘要

最近泄露的一份草案意见表明,美国最高法院准备最早在下个月推翻 一案。这样做,大法官们不仅将无视几十年来的先例,还将无视大量证据表明堕胎对患者健康和福祉的积极影响。

相似文献

1
The Court is ignoring science.法院无视科学。
Science. 2022 May 20;376(6595):779. doi: 10.1126/science.adc9968. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
The women of Roe v. Wade.罗诉韦德案中的女性们。
Hum Life Rev. 2003 Summer;29(3):31-8.
3
Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案裁决前后,美国30个州通过在线远程医疗提供自我管理药物流产的申请情况。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1768-1770. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18865.
4
A Critical Analysis of and the Consequences of Fetal Personhood.对胎儿人格化的批判分析及其后果。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 Jul;32(3):357-367. doi: 10.1017/S0963180122000809. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of .妇女羁押期间的堕胎机会
Am J Law Med. 2023 Dec;49(4):471-492. doi: 10.1017/amj.2024.4. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
Potential Effects of on Civil Commitment Law.对民事收容法的潜在影响。 (你提供的原文中“of”后面似乎缺少具体内容)
Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):359-373. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.37. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
7
Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.美国最高法院对德克萨斯州堕胎法的裁决:罗诉韦德案开始瓦解。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):621-622. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0050.
8
Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe.解决罗诉韦德案推翻后与堕胎专业实践相关的挑战。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;230(5):532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.026. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
9
Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?预判罗诉韦德案的未来走向:堕胎权在最高法院还能存续吗?
Health Care Law Mon. 2003 Mar:3-9.
10
Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的社会影响。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2751-2754. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00534-8. Epub 2024 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes, concerns, and perceptions of patients undergoing fertility treatments in an abortion restrictive state in the aftermath of the Roe v. Wade reversal.在 Roe v. Wade 案被推翻后,在一个堕胎限制州接受生育治疗的患者的态度、担忧和看法。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1703-1711. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03145-2. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
2
Comment on: Uncovering the interhospital price variations for vasectomies in the United States.对《揭示美国输精管切除术的医院间价格差异》的评论
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Jun 6. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00924-4.
3
Supporting Patients with Cancer after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案后对癌症患者的支持
Oncologist. 2022 Aug 13;27(9):711-3. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac165.
4
Evolution of Legislation and the Incidence of Elective Abortion in Spain: A Retrospective Observational Study (2011-2020).西班牙立法演变与选择性堕胎发生率:回顾性观察研究(2011-2020 年)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9674. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159674.