Suppr超能文献

[膀胱测压期间的压力传递质量是否取决于用力类型?]

[Is pressure transmission quality during cystometry dependent on the type of effort?].

作者信息

Jolu A, Miget G, Essid D, Dekimeche I, Chesnel C, Haddad R, Le Breton F, Grasland M, Amarenco G

机构信息

Sorbonne Université, GRC 01, GREEN Groupe de Recherche Clinique en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France.

Sorbonne Université, GRC 01, GREEN Groupe de Recherche Clinique en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 2022 Sep;32(11):763-768. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The International Continence Society (ICS) recommends a control of the good pressure transmission by a coughing effort during cystometry. While poor transmission is sometimes observed in routine practice, other maneuvers can also be proposed. The main objective of this study was to determine if there is a better maneuver to evaluate the pressure transmission ratio between the abdominal cavity and the bladder.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, consecutive, single-center study in a tertiary neuro-urology department in 31 subjects. During a cystometry, each patient was asked to perform at 0ml and 100ml of bladder filling, a cough effort, an abdominal push and a Valsalva maneuver controlled by a manometer. The value of the bladder pressure to abdominal pressure ratio was collected manually. The average variations were compared between each maneuver for the same volume of replenishment and between the 2 volumes of replenishment studied.

RESULTS

At 0ml of filling, the difference in pressure variation between the Pves and the Pabd is significantly higher during the cough maneuver compared to the Valsalva (P=0.015), which is not found at 100ml of filling.

CONCLUSION

During bladder filling, the pressure transmission ratios during the 3 maneuvers are equivalent. Coughing or abdominal thrusting, which are easier to perform than the Valsalva maneuver, should be recommended to check the quality of the recording during cystomanometry.

摘要

引言

国际尿控协会(ICS)建议在膀胱测压期间通过咳嗽动作来控制良好的压力传递。虽然在常规实践中有时会观察到压力传递不佳,但也可以采用其他动作。本研究的主要目的是确定是否存在更好的动作来评估腹腔与膀胱之间的压力传递率。

方法

我们在一家三级神经泌尿外科进行了一项前瞻性、连续性、单中心研究,共纳入31名受试者。在膀胱测压期间,要求每位患者在膀胱充盈量为0毫升和100毫升时分别进行咳嗽动作、腹部按压以及由压力计控制的瓦尔萨尔瓦动作。手动收集膀胱压力与腹部压力的比值。比较相同补液量下各动作之间以及所研究的两个补液量之间的平均变化。

结果

在充盈量为0毫升时,咳嗽动作期间膀胱压力(Pves)与腹部压力(Pabd)的压力变化差异显著高于瓦尔萨尔瓦动作(P = 0.015),而在充盈量为100毫升时未发现这种差异。

结论

在膀胱充盈期间,三种动作期间的压力传递率相当。咳嗽或腹部推压比瓦尔萨尔瓦动作更容易实施,在膀胱测压期间检查记录质量时应推荐使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验