Suppr超能文献

新装置实施腹部按压-减压联合胸部按压心肺复苏术的效果评价:这种联合心肺复苏技术是否能改善预后?

Evaluation of abdominal compression-decompression combined with chest compression CPR performed by a new device: Is the prognosis improved after this combination CPR technique?

机构信息

Department of Emergency, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, The Affiliated Hefei Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Center of 120 Emergency, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 13;30(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01036-y.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to compare the outcomes of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) and combined chest compression and abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CO-CPR) with a new device following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Moreover, we investigated whether patient prognosis improved with this combination treatment.

METHODS

This trial was a single-centre, prospective, randomized trial, and a blinded assessment of the outcomes was performed. A total of 297 consecutive patients with OHCA were initially screened, and 278 were randomized to the STD-CPR group (n = 135) or the CO-CPR group (n = 143). We compared the proportions of patients who achieved a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survived to hospital admission and survived to hospital discharge. In addition, we also performed the Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test at the end of the follow-up period to compare the survival curves of the two groups.

RESULTS

The differences were not statistically significant in the proportion of patients who achieved ROSC [31/135 (23.0%) versus 35/143 (24.5%)] and survived to hospital admission [28/135 (20.7%) versus 33/143 (23.1%)] between the CO-CPR group and STD-CPR group. However, there was a significant difference in the proportion of patients who survived to hospital discharge [16/135 (11.9%) versus 7/143 (4.9%)] between the two groups. Nine patients (6.7%) in the CO-CPR group and 2 patients (1.4%) in the STD group showed good neurological outcomes according to the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the patients in the CO-CPR group achieved better survival benefits than those in the STD-CPR group at the end of the follow-up period (log-rank P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

CO-CPR was more beneficial than STD-CPR in terms of survival benefits in patients who have suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registered number: ChiCTR2100049581 . Registered 30 July 2021- Retrospectively registered. http://www.medresman.org.cn/uc/index.aspx .

摘要

简介

本研究旨在比较标准心肺复苏术(STD-CPR)与新型联合胸外按压和腹部按压-减压心肺复苏术(CO-CPR)治疗院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的疗效。此外,我们还研究了这种联合治疗是否能改善患者预后。

方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性、随机临床试验,并对结果进行了盲法评估。共对 297 例 OHCA 患者进行了初步筛选,278 例患者随机分为 STD-CPR 组(n=135)或 CO-CPR 组(n=143)。我们比较了两组患者自主循环恢复(ROSC)、入院存活和出院存活的比例。此外,我们还在随访结束时进行了 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验,以比较两组的生存曲线。

结果

CO-CPR 组 ROSC 患者比例[31/135(23.0%)比 STD-CPR 组 35/143(24.5%)]和入院存活患者比例[28/135(20.7%)比 STD-CPR 组 33/143(23.1%)]差异无统计学意义。但两组出院存活患者比例[16/135(11.9%)比 STD-CPR 组 7/143(4.9%)]差异有统计学意义。CO-CPR 组 9 例(6.7%)患者和 STD 组 2 例(1.4%)患者根据脑功能分类(CPC)评分显示神经功能良好,差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,在随访结束时,CO-CPR 组患者的生存获益优于 STD-CPR 组(对数秩检验 P=0.007)。

结论

CO-CPR 组在院外心脏骤停患者的生存获益方面优于 STD-CPR 组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/471a/9375386/f9480c6082eb/13049_2022_1036_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验