• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部麻醉下单侧切开术与鞍状阻滞麻醉在乌干达西部的对比:一项前瞻性等效随机、双盲对照试验研究方案。

Open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block in western Uganda: a study protocol for a prospective equivalence randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Clinical Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka-Bushenyi, Uganda.

Faculty of Medicine, Université Catholique du Graben, Butembo, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Aug 13;23(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06636-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06636-8
PMID:35964122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9375060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia has been shown to be more cost-effective with shorter operation times and lower complication rates, local anesthesia is still not considered as a first-line technique in low-income countries like Uganda. The objective of this trial is to compare open hemorrhoidectomy using local anesthesia versus saddle block among patients with primary uncomplicated 3rd- or 4th-degree hemorrhoids in western Uganda.

METHODS

The protocol for a prospective equivalence randomized, double-blind controlled trial was conducted among patients with primary uncomplicated 3rd- or 4th-degree hemorrhoids. Recruitment was started in December 2021 and is expected to end in May 2022. Consenting participants who require open hemorrhoidectomy indicated at Kampala International Teaching Hospital, Uganda, will be randomized into two groups of 29 patients per arm.

DISCUSSION

The primary outcome of this study is to compare the occurrences of postoperative pain following open hemorrhoidectomy using the visual analog scale in an interval of 2, 4, and 6 h and 7 days postoperatively. Furthermore, the mean operative time from the induction of anesthesia to the end of the surgical procedure as well as the cost-effectiveness of the 2 techniques will be assessed in both groups. Open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia has the potential to offer benefits to patients but most importantly expediting return to baseline and functional status, shorter hospital stay by meeting the faster discharge criteria, and reduction in costs associated with reduced length of stay and complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202110667430356. Registered on 8 October 2021.

摘要

背景

虽然在局部麻醉下进行开放式痔切除术具有手术时间更短、并发症发生率更低、成本效益更高的优势,但在乌干达等低收入国家,局部麻醉仍未被视为一线技术。本试验旨在比较在乌干达西部,局部麻醉下开放式痔切除术与鞍状阻滞麻醉在原发性单纯 3 或 4 度痔患者中的效果。

方法

该前瞻性等效随机、双盲对照试验方案在原发性单纯 3 或 4 度痔患者中进行。招募工作于 2021 年 12 月开始,预计将于 2022 年 5 月结束。在乌干达坎帕拉国际教学医院需要开放式痔切除术的同意参与者将被随机分为两组,每组 29 名患者。

讨论

本研究的主要结局是比较在术后 2、4、6 小时和 7 天间隔内使用视觉模拟量表评估的开放式痔切除术后疼痛的发生情况。此外,还将评估两组患者从麻醉诱导到手术结束的平均手术时间以及两种技术的成本效益。局部麻醉下的开放式痔切除术有可能为患者带来益处,但最重要的是通过满足更快出院标准,更快地恢复基线和功能状态,缩短住院时间,降低与住院时间缩短和并发症相关的成本。

试验注册

泛非临床试验注册处 PACTR202110667430356。注册于 2021 年 10 月 8 日。

相似文献

1
Open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block in western Uganda: a study protocol for a prospective equivalence randomized, double-blind controlled trial.局部麻醉下单侧切开术与鞍状阻滞麻醉在乌干达西部的对比:一项前瞻性等效随机、双盲对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Aug 13;23(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06636-8.
2
Local anesthesia versus saddle block for open hemorrhoidectomy: cost-analysis from a randomized, double blind controlled trial.局部麻醉与鞍状阻滞在开放式痔切除术的比较:一项随机、双盲对照试验的成本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):1283. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10290-4.
3
Pain assessment following open hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia versus saddle block: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.局部麻醉下开放式痔切除术与鞍麻后疼痛评估:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2023 May 12;23(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02030-6.
4
Euthyroidectomy under local versus general anesthesia in health camp settings in Uganda: a protocol for randomized prospective equivalence single-blind controlled trial.在乌干达的健康营环境下,局部麻醉与全身麻醉行甲状腺切除术的随机前瞻性等效性单盲对照试验方案。
Trials. 2023 May 31;24(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07387-w.
5
Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.超声引导阴部神经阻滞在开放式痔切除术患者中的应用:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;35(9):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03630-x. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
Preemptive analgesia for hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.预防性镇痛在痔切除术的应用:前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 27;23(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06107-0.
7
Comparison of Two Methods: Spinal Anesthesia and Ischiorectal Block on Post Hemorrhoidectomy Pain and Hospital Stay: A Randomized Control Trial.两种方法的比较:腰麻与坐骨直肠阻滞对痔切除术后疼痛及住院时间的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Invest Surg. 2018 Oct;31(5):420-424. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1349221. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Tamponade dressings versus no tamponade after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.痔切除术后填塞敷料与不填塞敷料的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Apr 2;20(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3280-0.
9
Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up.脊髓麻醉或罗哌卡因阴部阻滞下Ligasure痔切除术与电刀痔切除术的比较:一项为期1年随访的随机前瞻性临床研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Sep;24(9):1011-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0715-1. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
10
Tissue selecting technique mega-window stapler combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation for the treatment of severe prolapsed hemorrhoids: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.组织选择技术超大窗口吻合器联合肛管上皮保留术治疗重度脱垂性痔:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e23122. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023122.

引用本文的文献

1
Local anesthesia versus saddle block for open hemorrhoidectomy: cost-analysis from a randomized, double blind controlled trial.局部麻醉与鞍状阻滞在开放式痔切除术的比较:一项随机、双盲对照试验的成本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):1283. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10290-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Perianal Block: Is It as Good as Spinal Anesthesia for Closed Hemorrhoidectomies?肛周阻滞:对于闭合性痔切除术,它与脊髓麻醉效果一样好吗?
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):36-41. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_225_17.
2
A mixed-methods evaluation of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Uganda Fellowship Scheme.英国和爱尔兰麻醉师协会乌干达研究员计划的混合方法评估。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Mar;73(3):284-294. doi: 10.1111/anae.14116. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
3
Is the severe pain after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy still currently remaining a major postoperative problem despite being one of the oldest surgical techniques described? A case series of 117 consecutive patients.
尽管Milligan-Morgan痔切除术是描述得最早的外科手术技术之一,但术后剧痛目前仍是一个主要的术后问题吗?对117例连续患者的病例系列研究。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:73-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
4
Complications Following Anorectal Surgery.肛肠手术后的并发症
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Mar;29(1):14-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1568145.
5
Regional anesthesia in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) surgery: A comparative study between saddle block and subarachnoid block.经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)手术中的区域麻醉:鞍区阻滞与蛛网膜下腔阻滞的比较研究。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):268-71. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.158497.
6
Comparison of the Anesthetic Techniques.麻醉技术的比较
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:650684. doi: 10.1155/2015/650684. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
7
Clinical practice. Hemorrhoids.临床实践。痔疮。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):944-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1204188.
8
How to calculate sample size in randomized controlled trial?如何在随机对照试验中计算样本量?
J Thorac Dis. 2009 Dec;1(1):51-4.
9
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗痔疮:一项系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):233-43; discussion 243. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01638.x. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
10
Randomized clinical trial comparing day-care open haemorrhoidectomy under local versus general anaesthesia.局部麻醉与全身麻醉下日间痔开放切除术的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2008 May;95(5):555-63. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6113.