Suppr超能文献

儿科超说明书使用抗精神病药治疗注意缺陷多动障碍。

Pediatric Off-label Antipsychotic Use for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.

University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2022 Sep;44(9):e83-e90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Off-label antipsychotic use for behavioral symptoms in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) poses safety concerns, and evidence to support such use is limited. This study aims to investigate the risk of off-label antipsychotic use associated with comorbid disruptive behavior disorder (DBD) among a cohort of youth with ADHD.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics data from 2007 to 2020. Youth 5 to 15 years of age at the index ADHD visit were included in the cohort. The index ADHD visit meets at least 1 of the following criteria: (1) 1 inpatient ADHD visit, (2) 2 outpatient ADHD visits within 90 days, or (3) an ADHD medication prescription fill within 30 days of an outpatient ADHD visit. We excluded youth who had a diagnosis of DBD or a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication for antipsychotics at baseline. Youth were followed up until antipsychotic initiation or were censored at a loss of coverage, receipt of an FDA-indicated diagnosis, or end of the study. A Cox proportional hazards regression model with DBD as a time-varying covariate estimated the hazard of antipsychotic use after the index ADHD visit.

FINDINGS

Of 41,098 youth with ADHD who met the study criteria, 4557 were diagnosed with DBD during follow-up. The incidence of antipsychotic initiation was 19.6 (95% CI, 18.7- 20.5) per 1000 person-years. After adjustment for baseline covariates, the hazard ratio of antipsychotic initiation associated with DBD was 4.64 (95% CI, 4.15-5.18).

IMPLICATIONS

Antipsychotic use among youth with ADHD is more likely in the presence of DBD, suggesting that an off-label use is for behavior problems.

摘要

目的

在儿科注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)中,非适应证使用抗精神病药物治疗行为症状存在安全隐患,且支持这种用法的证据有限。本研究旨在调查 ADHD 患儿共患破坏性行为障碍(DBD)时,非适应证使用抗精神病药物的风险。

方法

使用 IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics 数据库 2007 年至 2020 年的数据开展了一项队列研究。在指数 ADHD 就诊时年龄为 5 至 15 岁的青少年被纳入队列。指数 ADHD 就诊符合以下至少 1 项标准:(1)1 次住院 ADHD 就诊,(2)90 天内 2 次门诊 ADHD 就诊,或(3)门诊 ADHD 就诊后 30 天内开具 ADHD 药物处方。我们排除了基线时患有 DBD 或有美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的抗精神病药物适应证的患者。青少年在开始使用抗精神病药物或失去保险覆盖、接受 FDA 适应证诊断或研究结束前进行随访。使用时变协变量 DBD 的 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计指数 ADHD 就诊后使用抗精神病药物的风险。

结果

在符合研究标准的 41098 名 ADHD 青少年中,4557 名在随访期间被诊断为 DBD。抗精神病药物起始发生率为 19.6(95%CI,18.7-20.5)/1000 人年。在调整基线协变量后,DBD 与抗精神病药物起始相关的风险比为 4.64(95%CI,4.15-5.18)。

结论

ADHD 青少年中抗精神病药物的使用更有可能是由于 DBD,这表明非适应证使用是为了治疗行为问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验