Plantinga Laura C, Khakharia Anjali, Hoge Courtney, Vandenberg Ann E, Lea Janice P, Masud Tahsin, Gray Carol, O'Donnell Christopher M, James Kyle, Mutell Rich, Jaar Bernard G
Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Kidney Med. 2022 Jun 26;4(8):100511. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100511. eCollection 2022 Aug.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Suboptimal care coordination between dialysis facilities and hospitals is an important driver of 30-day hospital readmissions among patients receiving dialysis. We examined whether the introduction of web-based communications platform ("DialysisConnect") was associated with reduced hospital readmissions.
Pilot pre-post study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4,994 index admissions at a single hospital (representing 2,419 patients receiving dialysis) during the study period (January 1, 2019-May 31, 2021).
DialysisConnect was available to providers at the hospital and 4 affiliated dialysis facilities (=intervention facilities) during the pilot period (November 1, 2020-May 31, 2021).
The primary outcome was 30-day readmission; secondary outcomes included 30-day emergency department visits and observation stays. Interrupted time series and linear models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess pilot versus prepilot differences in outcomes; difference-in-difference analyses were performed to compare these differences between intervention versus control facilities. Sensitivity analyses included a third, prepilot/COVID-19 period (March 1, 2020-October 31, 2020).
There was no statistically significant difference in the monthly trends in the 30-day readmissions pilot versus prepilot periods (-0.60 vs -0.13, = 0.85) for intervention facility admissions; the difference-in-difference estimate was also not statistically significant (0.54 percentage points, = 0.83). Similar analyses including the prepilot/COVID-19 period showed that, despite a substantial drop in admissions at the start of the pandemic, there were no statistically significant differences across the 3 periods. The age-, sex-, race-, and comorbid condition-adjusted, absolute pilot versus prepilot difference in readmissions rate was 1.8% (-3.7% to 7.3%); similar results were found for other outcomes.
Potential loss to follow-up and pandemic effects.
In this pilot, the introduction of DialysisConnect was not associated with reduced hospital readmissions. Tailored care coordination solutions should be further explored in future, multisite studies to improve the communications gap between dialysis facilities and hospitals.
透析机构与医院之间的护理协调不佳是透析患者30天内再次入院的一个重要驱动因素。我们研究了引入基于网络的通信平台(“透析连接”)是否与降低再次入院率相关。
试点前后对照研究。
在研究期间(2019年1月1日至2021年5月31日),一家医院共有4994例首次入院病例(代表2419例接受透析的患者)。
在试点期间(2020年11月1日至2021年5月31日),医院及4家附属透析机构(=干预机构)的医护人员可使用“透析连接”。
主要结局是30天内再次入院;次要结局包括30天内急诊就诊和观察住院情况。采用中断时间序列分析和带广义估计方程的线性模型来评估试点期间与试点前在结局方面的差异;进行差异分析以比较干预机构与对照机构之间的这些差异。敏感性分析纳入了第三个时期,即试点前/新冠疫情时期(2020年3月1日至2020年10月31日)。
干预机构入院患者在试点期间与试点前30天再次入院的月度趋势无统计学显著差异(-0.60对-0.13,P = 0.85);差异分析估计值也无统计学显著意义(0.54个百分点,P = 0.83)。包括试点前/新冠疫情时期在内的类似分析表明,尽管疫情开始时入院人数大幅下降,但这三个时期之间无统计学显著差异。经年龄、性别、种族和合并症调整后,试点期间与试点前再次入院率的绝对差异为1.8%(-3.7%至7.3%);其他结局也得到类似结果。
存在随访失访的可能性以及疫情影响。
在本试点中,引入“透析连接”与降低再次入院率无关。未来应在多中心研究中进一步探索针对性的护理协调解决方案,以改善透析机构与医院之间的沟通差距。