Engebø Jonny, Torsheim Torbjørn, Pallesen Ståle
Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
The Norwegian Gambling Authority, Førde, Norway.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 27;13:857280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857280. eCollection 2022.
In this study, the use of measures to control gambling were investigated. Data from gamblers ( = 5,878) participating in a cross-sectional survey in 2019 based on random sampling from the Norwegian Population Registry, were analysed. The survey included questions about use of eight measures, which comprised the dependent variables. Questions about sociodemographics, gambling behaviour, gambling problems, self-reported impact from gambling advertisement and beliefs in measures to control gambling comprised the predictor variables. Logistic regression analyses were employed to identify significant predictors. Use of measures varied, ranging from 0.8% (contacting help services) to 23.2% (pre-commitment to affordable loss limits). All predictors had at least one significant association with the actual use of measures. Being a moderate risk or problem gambler was the most consistent predictor and was associated with the use of all eight measures. Being born outside Norway in a western or non-western country was associated with use of seven of the eight measures, whereas gambled online and participated in low-risk game only (inversely) were associated with use of six measures. Gender, age, game spending and beliefs in the usefulness of measures were associated with use of four measures. Participation in random games only was inversely associated with use of three measures. Self-reported impact from gambling advertisement was only (inversely) associated with self-testing for gambling problems. Several mechanisms responsible for the associations between predictors and the dependent variables are suggested, e.g., younger gamblers and moderate risk or problem gamblers may use these measures as they may acknowledge personal susceptibilities for developing gambling problems, such as impaired impulse control. Online gambling on the other hand was associated with use of various measures as the latter more often are integrated in online than offline gambling. Notably, the beliefs in measures as helpful was a significant predictor of use of four of the measures, which illustrates that positive views on the use of measures are not consistently associated with actual use of all the measures. Characteristics of the gamblers (e.g., place of birth, moderate risk or problem gambler), the game itself and the online distribution seem to be the most consistent predictors.
在本研究中,对控制赌博措施的使用情况进行了调查。分析了2019年基于挪威人口登记处随机抽样参与横断面调查的赌徒(n = 5878)的数据。该调查包括关于八项措施使用情况的问题,这些问题构成了因变量。关于社会人口统计学、赌博行为、赌博问题、自我报告的赌博广告影响以及对控制赌博措施的信念等问题构成了预测变量。采用逻辑回归分析来确定显著的预测因素。措施的使用情况各不相同,从0.8%(联系帮助服务)到23.2%(预先承诺设定可承受的损失限额)不等。所有预测因素与措施的实际使用至少有一个显著关联。成为中度风险或问题赌徒是最一致的预测因素,与所有八项措施的使用都有关联。出生在挪威境外的西方国家或非西方国家与八项措施中的七项使用有关,而仅在线赌博且只参与低风险游戏(呈负相关)与六项措施的使用有关。性别、年龄、游戏支出以及对措施有用性的信念与四项措施的使用有关。仅参与随机游戏与三项措施的使用呈负相关。自我报告的赌博广告影响仅(呈负相关)与赌博问题的自我测试有关。提出了几种导致预测因素与因变量之间关联的机制,例如,年轻赌徒以及中度风险或问题赌徒可能使用这些措施,因为他们可能认识到自己有发展成赌博问题的个人易感性,比如冲动控制受损。另一方面,在线赌博与各种措施的使用有关,因为后者在在线赌博中比离线赌博中更常被整合。值得注意的是,对措施有用性的信念是四项措施使用的显著预测因素,这表明对措施使用的积极看法并非始终与所有措施的实际使用相关。赌徒的特征(如出生地、中度风险或问题赌徒)、游戏本身以及在线分布似乎是最一致的预测因素。