Zhai Zhengqin, Zhao Shuang, Li Xiaoyao, Chen Keping, Xu Wei, Hua Wei, Su Yangang, Tang Min, Li Zeyi, Zhang Shu
China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 29;9:937655. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.937655. eCollection 2022.
To determine the interaction of electrical storm (ES) and impaired left ventircular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the mortality risk of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
A total of 554 Chinese ICD recipients from 2010 to 2014 were retrospectively included and the mean follow-up was 58 months. The proportions of dilated cardiomyopathy and the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were 26.0% (144/554) and 5.6% (31/554), respectively. There were 8 cases with long QT syndrome, 6 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and 2 with Brugada syndrome. Patients with prior MI accounted for 15.5% (86/554) and pre-implantation syncope accounted for 23.3% (129/554). A total of 199 (35.9%) patients had primary prevention indications for ICD therapy. Both ES and impaired LVEF (<40%) were independent predictors for all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.40, 95% CI 1.57-3.68, < 0.001; HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.30-2.90, = 0.001, respectively] and cardiovascular mortality (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.68-7.98, < 0.001; HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.47-4.44, = 0.001, respectively). Compared with patients with preserved LVEF (≥40%) and without ES, patients with impaired LVEF and ES had highest all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risks (HR 4.17, 95% CI 2.16-8.06, < 0.001; HR 11.91, 95% CI 5.55-25.56, < 0.001, respectively). In patients with impaired LVEF, ES increased the all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risks (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.00-3.37, = 0.034; HR 4.86, 95% CI 2.39-9.86, < 0.001, respectively). In patients with ES, the deleterious effects of impaired LVEF seemed confined to cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.25-5.14, = 0.038), and the HR for all-cause mortality was not significant statistically (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.54-2.38, = 0.735).
Both ES and impaired LVEF are independent predictors of mortality risk in this Chinese cohort of ICD recipients. The interaction of ES and impaired LVEF in patients significantly amplifies the deleterious effects of each other as distinct disease.
确定电风暴(ES)和左心室射血分数降低(LVEF)对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者死亡风险的相互作用。
回顾性纳入2010年至2014年共554例中国ICD植入患者,平均随访58个月。扩张型心肌病和肥厚型心肌病的比例分别为26.0%(144/554)和5.6%(31/554)。长QT综合征患者8例,致心律失常性右室心肌病患者6例,Brugada综合征患者2例。既往有心肌梗死的患者占15.5%(86/554),植入前晕厥患者占23.3%(129/554)。共有199例(35.9%)患者有ICD治疗的一级预防指征。ES和LVEF降低(<40%)均是全因死亡的独立预测因素[风险比(HR)2.40,95%可信区间(CI)1.57 - 3.68,P<0.001;HR 1.94,95%CI 1.30 - 2.90,P = 0.001]以及心血管死亡的独立预测因素(HR 4.63,95%CI 2.68 - 7.98,P<0.001;HR 2.56,95%CI 1.47 - 4.44,P = 0.001)。与LVEF保留(≥40%)且无ES的患者相比,LVEF降低且有ES的患者全因和心血管死亡风险最高(HR 4.17,95%CI 2.16 - 8.06,P<0.001;HR 11.91,95%CI 5.55 - 25.56,P<0.001)。在LVEF降低的患者中,ES增加了全因和心血管死亡风险(HR分别为1.84,95%CI 1.00 - 3.37,P = 0.034;HR 4.86,95%CI 2.39 - 9.86,P<0.001)。在有ES的患者中,LVEF降低的有害作用似乎仅限于心血管死亡(HR 2.54,95%CI 1.25 - 5.14,P = 0.038),全因死亡的HR无统计学意义(HR 1.14,95%CI 0.54 - 2.38,P = 0.735)。
在这个中国ICD植入患者队列中,ES和LVEF降低均是死亡风险的独立预测因素。ES和LVEF降低在患者中的相互作用显著放大了彼此作为不同疾病的有害作用。