Value of 3D Printed PLGA Scaffolds for Cartilage Defects in Terms of Repair.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) and sodium alginate (SA) scaffolds produced by 3D printing technology, access the healing morphology of bones following PLGA/SA implantation within rat cartilage, and examine osteogenesis-related factors in rat serum to determine the efficacy of PLGA/SA scaffolds in healing animal cartilage injuries. To identify the potential of this material to repair a tissue engineering osteochondral injury.

METHODS

Polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer and sodium alginate were used as raw materials to create PLGA/SA scaffolds. We observed the scaffold's macrostructure and microstructure, and the scaffold's microstructure was observed through a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The mechanical toughness of a stent was assessed using a biomechanical device. Hematoxylin-eosin staining revealed immune rejection after embedding the scaffolds under the skin of SD rats. The CCK-8 cell proliferation test kit was used to measure cell proliferation. An experimental model of cartilage injury in the knee joint was created in rats. Rats were used to establish an experimental model of cartilage damage in the knee joint. 120 female rats aged 5 weeks were chosen at random from the pool and divided into the experimental and control groups. They were all completely anesthetized with an anesthetic before having the lateral skin of the knee articular cartilage incised. Implanted PLGA/SA scaffolds were not used in the control group and only in the experiment group. Both groups of rats had their muscles and skin sutured and covered in plaster bandages. On the third, seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first, twenty-eighth, and thirty-fifth days after the procedure, the two groups of rats were divided into groups. At various stages, bone tissue, blood samples, and cartilage were examined and evaluated. Immunohistochemistry was used to identify the local bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2).

RESULTS

(1) PLGA/SA was successfully used to build an artificial cartilage scaffold. (2) Macroscopic and SEM observation results showed the material had increased density and numerous microvoids on the surface. (3) The result of the biomechanical test showed that the PLGA/SA scaffold had superior biomechanical characteristics. (4) The stent did not exhibit any noticeable immunological rejection, according to the results of the subcutaneous embedding experiment performed on rats. (5) The CCK-8 data demonstrated that as the cell development time rose, the number of cells gradually increased. However, there was not statistically significant difference between the growth of the cells in the scaffold extract and the control group ( > 0.05). (6) A successful rat model based on a cartilage defect of the medial knee joint has been built. (7) Observations of specimens revealed that the experimental group's bone tissue score was higher than that of the control group. (8) Using immunohistochemistry, it was found that the experimental group's BMP2 expression was higher on the 7th, 14th, and 28th days than it was in the control group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Strong mechanical and biological properties are present in stable, biodegradable PLGA/SA scaffolds that mimic cartilage. We demonstrated that the cartilage biomimetic PLGA/SA scaffold may repair cartilage and prevent negative reactions such as osteoarthritis in rat knee cartilage, making it suitable as a cartilage scaffolding material for tissue engineering. The PLGA/SA scaffold was also able to promote BMP2 expression in the bone healing zone when inserted into a knee cartilage lesion. Improved cartilage damage is the outcome of BMP2's promotion of bone formation and restriction of bone resorption in the bone healing zone.