Bayly Bryana L, Kercheval Jacquelyn B, Cranford James A, Girgla Taania, Adapa Arjun R, Busschots Ginette V, Li Katheen Y, Perry Marcia, Fung Christopher M, Greineder Colin F, Losman Eve D
Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 12;14(7):e26771. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26771. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Background and objective Although hospitalization is required for only a minority of those infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the high rates of morbidity and mortality among these patients have led researchers to focus on the predictors of admission and adverse outcomes in the inpatient population. However, there is scarce data on the clinical trajectory of individuals symptomatic enough to present for emergency care, but not sick enough to be admitted. In light of this, we aimed to examine the symptomatology, emergency department (ED) revisits, and hospitalization of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outpatients after discharge from the ED. Methods Adult patients with COVID-19 infection were prospectively enrolled after discharge from the ED between May and December 2020. Patients were followed up longitudinally for 14 days via phone interviews designed to provide support and information and to track symptomatology, ED revisits, and hospitalization. Results A volunteer, medical student-run program enrolled 199 COVID-19 patients discharged from the ED during the first nine months of the pandemic. Of the 176 patients (88.4%) who completed the 14-day protocol, 29 (16.5%) had a second ED visit and 17 (9.6%) were admitted, 16 (9%) for worsening COVID-19 symptoms. Age, male sex, comorbid illnesses, and self-reported dyspnea, diarrhea, chills, and fever were associated with hospital admission for patients with a subsequent ED visit. For those who did not require admission, symptoms generally improved following ED discharge. Age >65 years and a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were associated with a longer duration of cough, but generally, patient characteristics and comorbidities did not significantly affect the overall number or duration of symptoms. Conclusions Nearly one in five patients discharged from the ED with COVID-19 infection had a second ED evaluation during a 14-day follow-up period, despite regular phone interactions aimed at providing support and information. More than half of them required admission for worsening COVID-19 symptoms. Established risk factors for severe disease and self-reported persistence of certain symptoms were associated with hospital admission, while those who did not require hospitalization had a steady improvement in symptoms over the 14-day period.
背景与目的 尽管只有少数感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的患者需要住院治疗,但这些患者的高发病率和死亡率促使研究人员关注住院患者的入院预测因素和不良结局。然而,关于有症状到急诊就诊但病情尚不足以入院的个体的临床病程的数据很少。有鉴于此,我们旨在研究2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)门诊患者从急诊科出院后的症状、急诊科复诊情况及住院情况。方法 2020年5月至12月期间,对从急诊科出院的成年COVID-19感染患者进行前瞻性登记。通过电话访谈对患者进行为期14天的纵向随访,旨在提供支持和信息,并跟踪症状、急诊科复诊情况及住院情况。结果 在疫情的前九个月,一个由医学生志愿者运营的项目招募了199名从急诊科出院的COVID-19患者。在完成14天方案的176名患者(88.4%)中,29名(16.5%)再次到急诊科就诊,17名(9.6%)入院,其中16名(9%)因COVID-19症状恶化入院。年龄、男性、合并症以及自我报告的呼吸困难、腹泻、寒战和发热与随后到急诊科就诊的患者入院有关。对于那些不需要入院的患者,急诊科出院后症状一般有所改善。年龄>65岁和有心血管疾病(CVD)史与咳嗽持续时间较长有关,但总体而言,患者特征和合并症对症状的总数或持续时间没有显著影响。结论 在14天的随访期内,近五分之一从急诊科出院的COVID-19感染患者进行了第二次急诊科评估,尽管进行了旨在提供支持和信息的定期电话沟通。其中一半以上因COVID-19症状恶化需要入院。已确定的严重疾病风险因素和自我报告某些症状的持续存在与入院有关,而那些不需要住院的患者在14天内症状稳步改善。