• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估日本图书馆工作人员中频电磁场和脉冲电磁场的联合暴露情况。

Assessment of combined exposure to intermediate-frequency electromagnetic fields and pulsed electromagnetic fields among library workers in Japan.

机构信息

Work Environment Research Group, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Kawasaki, Japan.

Department of Systems Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Japan.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:870784. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870784. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.870784
PMID:35968480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9366663/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess exposure levels to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) among library workers in Japan, focusing on co-exposure to intermediate-frequency EMF (IF-EMF) and pulsed EMF, to propose a new epidemiological research methodology.

METHODS

The evaluated exposure sources were an electromagnetic type-electronic article surveillance gate (EM-EAS, IF-EMF (operating frequency 220 Hz-14 kHz)) and an activator/deactivator of anti-theft tags termed as "book check unit" (BCU, pulsed EMF). Short-term exposures were: (E1) whole-body exposure from the EAS gate when sitting within 3 m; (E2) local exposure to transient IF-EMF while passing through or beside the EAS gate; and (E3) local exposure to a pulsed magnetic field on BCU use. E1-E3 were evaluated based on exposure levels relative to magnetic flux density at the occupational reference level (RL; E1) or as per occupational basic restrictions (BR; E2 and E3) delineated by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 2010 guidelines. Exposure indices based on mid-term exposure (D1-D3), assuming exposure according to employment on a weekly basis, were used to assess exposure in actual working conditions. D1 represents continuous exposure from an EAS gate when sitting within 3 m of the gate. D2 and D3 represent repeated transient exposures occurring during gate pass or on the operation of a BCU. A link to a web-based questionnaire was distributed to librarians working at all libraries where the authors had mailed institutional questionnaires (4,073 libraries). Four exposure patterns were defined according to various exposure scenarios.

RESULTS

We obtained information on exposure parameters and working conditions from the 548 completed questionnaires. The ICNIRP guideline levels were not exceeded in any of the E1-E3 scenarios. Median of the D1 (% ICNIRP RL × hour/week) was 1, and >85% respondents had values <10. However, the maximum value was 513. Altogether, these results indicate that continuous exposure was low in most cases. The same tendency was observed regarding repeated transient exposure from EM-EAS gates (i.e., the median value for D2 (% ICNIRP BR × gate pass) was 5). However, there were several cases in which D1 and D2 values were >10 times the median. The median of D3 (% ICNIRP BR × BCU operation) was 10, and most respondents' D3 values were greater than their D2 values, although the derived results depended on the assumptions made for the estimation.

CONCLUSION

We conducted an assessment of combined exposures to IF-EMF and pulsed EMF among library workers in Japan by evaluating both short-term exposures (E1-E3) and exposure indices based on mid-term exposures (D1-D3) assuming actual working conditions per questionnaire results. These results provide useful information for future epidemiological studies.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8bb/9366663/f8b3994e7bb3/fpubh-10-870784-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8bb/9366663/c7ae39f92023/fpubh-10-870784-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8bb/9366663/f8b3994e7bb3/fpubh-10-870784-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8bb/9366663/c7ae39f92023/fpubh-10-870784-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8bb/9366663/f8b3994e7bb3/fpubh-10-870784-g0002.jpg
摘要

目的

评估日本图书馆工作人员接触电磁场(EMF)的水平,重点关注中频 EMF(IF-EMF)和脉冲 EMF 的共暴露情况,并提出一种新的流行病学研究方法。

方法

评估的暴露源包括电磁式电子物品监控门(EM-EAS,IF-EMF(工作频率 220 Hz-14 kHz))和防盗标签的激活/去激活器,称为“图书检查单元”(BCU,脉冲 EMF)。短期暴露包括:(E1)坐在 3 m 范围内的 EAS 门内时全身暴露;(E2)通过或在 EAS 门旁边时局部暴露于瞬态 IF-EMF;(E3)在使用 BCU 时局部暴露于脉冲磁场。E1-E3 的评估基于相对于职业参考水平(RL;E1)的磁通密度的暴露水平,或基于国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)2010 年指南规定的职业基本限制(BR;E2 和 E3)。基于中期暴露(D1-D3)的暴露指数,假设每周根据就业情况进行暴露,用于评估实际工作条件下的暴露情况。D1 表示坐在离门 3 m 范围内的 EAS 门时的连续暴露。D2 和 D3 表示在门通过或 BCU 操作期间发生的重复瞬态暴露。向作者已向其邮寄机构问卷的所有图书馆的图书馆员分发了一个基于网络的问卷链接(4073 个图书馆)。根据各种暴露情况定义了四种暴露模式。

结果

我们从 548 份完成的问卷中获得了暴露参数和工作条件的信息。在任何 E1-E3 情况下,ICNIRP 准则水平均未超标。D1(% ICNIRP RL×小时/周)的中位数为 1,超过 85%的受访者的值<10。然而,最大值为 513。总的来说,这些结果表明大多数情况下连续暴露较低。从 EM-EAS 门的重复瞬态暴露来看,也存在同样的趋势(即,D2(% ICNIRP BR×门通过)的中位数为 5)。然而,在某些情况下,D1 和 D2 的值是中位数的 10 倍以上。D3(% ICNIRP BR×BCU 操作)的中位数为 10,大多数受访者的 D3 值大于其 D2 值,尽管推导结果取决于对估计的假设。

结论

我们通过评估短期暴露(E1-E3)和基于中期暴露(D1-D3)的暴露指数,评估了日本图书馆工作人员接触 IF-EMF 和脉冲 EMF 的综合暴露情况,假设结果基于问卷调查结果的实际工作条件。这些结果为未来的流行病学研究提供了有用的信息。

相似文献

1
Assessment of combined exposure to intermediate-frequency electromagnetic fields and pulsed electromagnetic fields among library workers in Japan.评估日本图书馆工作人员中频电磁场和脉冲电磁场的联合暴露情况。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:870784. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870784. eCollection 2022.
2
Measurement and Exposure Assessment of Intermediate Frequency Magnetic Fields From Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) Gates in Libraries.测量和暴露评估来自图书馆电子物品监视 (EAS) 门的中频磁场。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:871134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.871134. eCollection 2022.
3
Occupational exposure to intermediate frequency and extremely low frequency magnetic fields among personnel working near electronic article surveillance systems.在电子商品防盗系统附近工作的人员中,职业性接触中频和极低频磁场。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2014 May;35(4):245-50. doi: 10.1002/bem.21850. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
4
Assessment of physiotherapists' occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from shortwave and microwave diathermy devices: a literature review.评估物理治疗师在短波和微波透热疗法设备中接触射频电磁场的情况:文献综述。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(6):312-27. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.782203.
5
Protection of Workers Exposed to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields: A Perspective on Open Questions in the Context of the New ICNIRP 2020 Guidelines.保护射频电磁场暴露的工人:新 ICNIRP 2020 指南背景下的开放性问题视角。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 2;10:875946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.875946. eCollection 2022.
6
Exposure assessment of radio frequency electromagnetic field levels in hospitals of Samsun Province, Turkey.土耳其萨姆斯省医院射频电磁场水平的暴露评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(27):34005-34017. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09669-1. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
[The development of the new guidelines of the Italian association of medical radioprotection (AIRM) for the protection of the workers exposed to EMF related risks: new approaches and criteria].[意大利医学放射防护协会(AIRM)关于保护暴露于电磁辐射相关风险的工人的新指南的制定:新方法和标准]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2020 Dec;42(4):304-309.
8
Occupational exposures to high frequency electromagnetic fields in the intermediate range ( >300 Hz-10 MHz).职业性暴露于中频范围(>300赫兹 - 10兆赫兹)的高频电磁场。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2002 Dec;23(8):568-77. doi: 10.1002/bem.10050.
9
Development of a Job-Exposure Matrix for Assessment of Occupational Exposure to High-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (3 kHz-300 GHz).高频电磁场(3 kHz-300 GHz)职业暴露评估用工作暴露矩阵的开发。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Nov 13;63(9):1013-1028. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz067.
10
Systematic numerical assessment of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields of transcranial magnetic stimulation.系统地对经颅磁刺激的电磁场职业暴露进行数值评估。
Med Phys. 2022 May;49(5):3416-3431. doi: 10.1002/mp.15567. Epub 2022 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement and Exposure Assessment of Intermediate Frequency Magnetic Fields From Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) Gates in Libraries.测量和暴露评估来自图书馆电子物品监视 (EAS) 门的中频磁场。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:871134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.871134. eCollection 2022.
2
Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: Results from the international MOBI-Kids study.儿童和青少年使用无线电话与神经上皮脑肿瘤:来自国际 MOBI-Kids 研究的结果。
Environ Int. 2022 Feb;160:107069. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107069. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: An individualized assessment approach.
职业接触高频电磁场与 INTEROCC 研究中脑肿瘤风险:一种个体化评估方法。
Environ Int. 2018 Oct;119:353-365. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.038. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
4
Measurements of intermediate-frequency electric and magnetic fields in households.家庭中中频电场和磁场的测量。
Environ Res. 2017 Apr;154:160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
In situ exposure assessment of intermediate frequency fields of diverse devices.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Apr;164(3):252-64. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu257. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
6
Occupational exposure to intermediate frequency and extremely low frequency magnetic fields among personnel working near electronic article surveillance systems.在电子商品防盗系统附近工作的人员中,职业性接触中频和极低频磁场。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2014 May;35(4):245-50. doi: 10.1002/bem.21850. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Exposure of the human body to professional and domestic induction cooktops compared to the basic restrictions.与基本限制相比,人体暴露于专业和家用电磁炉的情况。
Bioelectromagnetics. 2012 Dec;33(8):695-705. doi: 10.1002/bem.21739. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
8
Pre- and post-natal exposure of children to EMF generated by domestic induction cookers.儿童在产前和产后暴露于家用电磁炉产生的电磁场中。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Oct 7;56(19):6149-60. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/19/001. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
Estimation of RF energy absorbed in the brain from mobile phones in the Interphone Study.从 Interphone 研究中的移动电话估算大脑吸收的射频能量。
Occup Environ Med. 2011 Sep;68(9):686-93. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100065. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
10
In situ magnetic field exposure and ICNIRP-based safety distances for electronic article surveillance systems.电子物品监视系统的原位磁场暴露及基于国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)的安全距离
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Mar;148(4):420-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr206. Epub 2011 May 24.