Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e217-e225. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005662. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
Prehabilitation has potential for improving surgical outcomes as shown in previous randomized controlled trials. However, a marked efficacy-effectiveness gap is limiting its scalability. Comprehensive analyses of deployment of the intervention in real-life scenarios are required.
To assess health outcomes and cost of prehabilitation.
Prospective cohort study with a control group built using propensity score-matching techniques.
Prehabilitation Unit in a tertiary-care university hospital.
Candidates for major digestive, cardiac, thoracic, gynecologic, or urologic surgeries.
Prehabilitation program, including supervised exercise training, promotion of physical activity, nutritional optimization, and psychological support.
The comprehensive complication index, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital costs per patient until 30 days after surgery. Patients were classified by the degree of program completion and level of surgical aggression for sensitivity analysis.
The analysis of the entire study group did not show differences in study outcomes between prehabilitation and control groups (n=328 each). The per-protocol analysis, including only patients completing the program (n=112, 34%), showed a reduction in mean hospital stay [9.9 (7.2) vs 12.8 (12.4) days; P =0.035]. Completers undergoing highly aggressive surgeries (n=60) additionally showed reduction in mean intensive care unit stay [2.3 (2.7) vs 3.8 (4.2) days; P =0.021] and generated mean cost savings per patient of €3092 (32% cost reduction) ( P =0.007). Five priority areas for action to enhance service efficiencies were identified.
The study indicates a low rate of completion of the intervention and identifies priority areas for re-design of service delivery to enhance the effectiveness of prehabilitation.
如先前的随机对照试验所示, 术前康复有改善手术结果的潜力。 然而, 明显的疗效效果差距限制了其可扩展性。 需要对干预措施在实际情况下的部署进行综合分析。
评估术前康复的健康结果和成本。
使用倾向评分匹配技术构建对照组的前瞻性队列研究。
三级保健大学医院的术前康复病房。
接受主要消化、心脏、胸部、妇科或泌尿科手术的候选人。
术前康复计划,包括监督运动训练、促进体力活动、营养优化和心理支持。
综合并发症指数、 住院和重症监护病房住院时间以及每位患者术后 30 天的住院费用。根据方案完成程度和手术侵袭程度对患者进行分类,进行敏感性分析。
整个研究组的分析并未显示术前康复组和对照组在研究结果上的差异(每组 328 例)。包括仅完成方案的患者(n=112,34%)在内的方案患者分析显示,平均住院时间缩短[9.9(7.2)比 12.8(12.4)天;P=0.035]。接受高度侵袭性手术的完成者(n=60)还显示,平均重症监护病房停留时间缩短[2.3(2.7)比 3.8(4.2)天;P=0.021],每位患者平均节省费用 3092 欧元(32%成本降低)(P=0.007)。确定了五个提高服务效率的优先行动领域。
该研究表明干预措施的完成率较低,并确定了重新设计服务交付以提高术前康复效果的优先领域。