Suppr超能文献

入侵和本地草对木本灌木三齿蒿产生了负的植物-土壤反馈。

Invasive and native grasses exert negative plant-soil feedbacks on the woody shrub Artemisia tridentata.

机构信息

School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA.

Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2022 Aug;199(4):1007-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05236-2. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

Abstract

Displacement of diverse native plant communities by low-diversity invasive communities is a global problem. In the western United States, the displacement of sagebrush-dominated communities by cheatgrass has increased since the 1920s. Restoration outcomes are poor, potentially due to soil alteration by cheatgrass. We explored the poorly understood role of plant-soil feedbacks in the dominance of cheatgrass in a greenhouse study where uninvaded sagebrush soils were conditioned with either cheatgrass, a native bunchgrass or sagebrush. Sagebrush seedlings were grown in the soils that remained following the removal of conditioning plants. We expected cheatgrass to strongly suppress sagebrush due to a change in belowground microbial communities, conspecifics to have neutral effects and the native bunchgrass to have intermediate effects as it coevolved with sagebrush but belongs to a different functional group. We assessed the effects of conditioning on sagebrush growth, tissue nutrients, and carbon allocation. We also characterized the abundance, diversity and community composition of root microbial associates. Cheatgrass strongly suppressed sagebrush growth at high and low conditioning densities, the native bunchgrass showed suppression at high conditioning densities only and conspecific effects were neutral. Tissue nutrients, amount of root colonization by soil fungi or root microbial community composition were not associated with these plant-soil feedbacks. Although we did not identify the precise mechanism, our results provide key evidence that rapid soil alteration by cheatgrass results in negative plant-soil feedbacks on sagebrush growth. These feedbacks likely contribute to cheatgrass dominance and the poor success of sagebrush restoration.

摘要

由低多样性入侵群落取代多种原生植物群落是一个全球性问题。在美国西部,自 20 世纪 20 年代以来,以山艾树为主的群落被 cheatgrass(一种入侵草本植物)取代的情况有所增加。由于 cheatgrass 改变了土壤,恢复效果不佳。我们在温室研究中探索了植物-土壤反馈在 cheatgrass 占主导地位方面的作用,该研究中未受入侵的山艾树土壤分别用 cheatgrass、一种本地丛生草或山艾树进行了调节。在去除调节植物后留下的土壤中种植山艾树苗。我们预计 cheatgrass 会由于地下微生物群落的变化而强烈抑制山艾树,因为它是同一种植物;而同类丛生草的影响则是中性的,因为它与山艾树共同进化但属于不同的功能群;而本地丛生草的影响则是中间性的,因为它与山艾树共同进化但属于不同的功能群。我们评估了调节对山艾树生长、组织养分和碳分配的影响。我们还描述了根微生物伴生物的丰度、多样性和群落组成。Cheatgrass 在高和低调节密度下强烈抑制山艾树的生长,本地丛生草仅在高调节密度下显示出抑制作用,而同类的影响则是中性的。组织养分、土壤真菌对根系的定殖量或根微生物群落组成与这些植物-土壤反馈无关。尽管我们没有确定确切的机制,但我们的结果提供了关键证据,表明 cheatgrass 的快速土壤改变导致了山艾树生长的负向植物-土壤反馈。这些反馈可能导致 cheatgrass 的优势和山艾树恢复的不佳成功。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验