• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?从表现优异的筛查项目中,我们可以学到哪些经验来提高澳大利亚的结直肠癌筛查参与率?
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221121383. doi: 10.1177/10732748221121383.
2
Engaging lower screening groups: a field experiment to evaluate the impact of a multiwave national campaign on participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.吸引筛查率较低的群体:一项实地实验,评估多轮全国性运动对参与国家肠癌筛查计划的影响。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 15;13(3):e065124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065124.
3
SMARTERscreen protocol: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of patient SMS messaging in general practice to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.SMARTERscreen 方案:在一般实践中对患者发送短信以增加参与澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的三臂群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Nov 13;24(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07756-5.
4
Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.提高澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的参与度和投资效益,改善其结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 3;15(2):e0227899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227899. eCollection 2020.
5
Impact of a mass media campaign on participation rates in a National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: a field experiment.大众媒体宣传活动对国家肠癌筛查计划参与率的影响:一项现场试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e024267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024267.
6
Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.邮寄邀请策略对提高男性粪便潜血试验参与率的比较:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2013 Jul 31;14:239. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-239.
7
Geographic variation in compliance with Australian colorectal cancer screening programs: the role of attitudinal and cognitive traits.澳大利亚结直肠癌筛查项目依从性的地理差异:态度和认知特征的作用。
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Jul;19(3):4957. doi: 10.22605/RRH4957. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
8
The SMARTscreen Trial: a randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a GP-endorsed narrative SMS to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.SMARTscreen 试验:一项随机对照试验,旨在调查经全科医生认可的叙事短信增加参与澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的效果。
Trials. 2022 Jan 12;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05877-3.
9
Co-designing planning interventions to facilitate participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening.合作设计规划干预措施,以促进参与邮寄式结直肠癌筛查。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):2418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19867-y.
10
Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the Netherlands.荷兰通过重复粪便潜血试验实施结直肠癌人群筛查。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 24;9:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Global colorectal cancer screening programs and coverage rate estimation: an evidence synthesis.全球结直肠癌筛查项目与覆盖率估计:一项证据综合分析
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 22;23(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06887-4.
2
Early detection efforts for colorectal and prostate cancer from the patient's perspective over the course of 12 years: results of the KABOT survey study.从患者角度看12年间结直肠癌和前列腺癌的早期检测工作:KABOT调查研究结果
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Dec 16;25:e68. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000653.
3
Screening patients in general practice for advanced chronic liver disease using an innovative IT solution: The Liver Toolkit.使用创新的 IT 解决方案在全科医疗中筛查慢性肝病进展患者:Liver Toolkit。
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Jun 27;8(7). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000482. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.
4
SMARTERscreen protocol: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of patient SMS messaging in general practice to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.SMARTERscreen 方案:在一般实践中对患者发送短信以增加参与澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的三臂群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Nov 13;24(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07756-5.
5
Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015-2020.澳大利亚 2015-2020 年结直肠癌筛查参与的地域和空间差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0288992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288992. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The SWIM study: Ethnic minority women's ideas and preferences for a tailored intervention to promote national cancer screening programmes-A qualitative interview study.SWIM 研究:少数民族妇女对促进国家癌症筛查计划的定制干预措施的想法和偏好——一项定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1692-1700. doi: 10.1111/hex.13309. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
2
Piloting gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: population-based registry study from Finland.采用粪便免疫化学检测进行面向性别的结直肠癌筛查试点:芬兰基于人群的登记研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 8;11(2):e046667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046667.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial.基于受教育程度的大肠癌筛查决策辅助工具对知情选择各要素效果的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241703. eCollection 2020.
5
Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study.丹麦贫困地区少数民族女性对癌症的认知及癌症筛查障碍 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1.
6
Transition to quantitative faecal immunochemical testing from guaiac faecal occult blood testing in a fully rolled-out population-based national bowel screening programme.从基于人群的全国结直肠筛查项目中全面开展的潜血免疫胶体金法检测过渡到定量粪便免疫化学检测。
Gut. 2021 Jan;70(1):106-113. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320297. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
7
Geographical Disparities in Screening and Cancer-Related Health Behaviour.筛查和与癌症相关的健康行为的地域差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;17(4):1246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041246.
8
The LEAD trial-The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial.LEAD 试验 - 丹麦未参与基于 FIT 的结直肠癌筛查的教育程度较低的公民在决策方面的决策辅助工具的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):359-368. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
GPs' perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context.全科医生对结直肠癌筛查的看法及其对粪便免疫化学检测阳性患者的潜在影响:一项来自荷兰的探索性定性研究
BJGP Open. 2019 Mar 20;3(1):bjgpopen18X101631. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101631. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Participation and Ease of Use in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Comparison of 2 Fecal Immunochemical Tests.参与度和使用便捷性在结直肠癌筛查中的比较:两种粪便免疫化学检测方法的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;114(3):511-518. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000148.

从表现优异的筛查项目中,我们可以学到哪些经验来提高澳大利亚的结直肠癌筛查参与率?

What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?

机构信息

Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26066Amsterdam UMC, AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221121383. doi: 10.1177/10732748221121383.

DOI:10.1177/10732748221121383
PMID:35969473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9381723/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most diagnosed cancer in men and women and second most common cause of cancer death in Australia; Australia's CRC incidence and mortality are among the world's highest. The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program began in 2006; however, only 33% of those approached for the first time by the Program between 2018 and 2019 returned the kit. Of the 5.7 million kits sent during this period, only 44% were returned. Our aim was to identify practices and features of national bowel cancer screening programs in countries with similar programs but higher screening participation, to identify potential interventions for optimising Australian CRC screening participation.

METHODS

We searched published and grey literature for CRC screening programs reporting at least 50% screening participation using postal invitation and free return of iFOBT home kits. Interviews were conducted with cancer registry staff and academic researchers, focused on participant and practitioner engagement in screening.

RESULTS

National programs in Netherlands, Scotland, Denmark, and Finland reported over 50% screening participation rates for all invitation rounds. Shared characteristics include small populations within small geographic areas relative to Australia; relatively high literacy; a one-sample iFOBT kit; national registration systems for population cancer screening research; and screening program research including randomised trials of program features.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from the one-sample kit, we identified no single solution to persistent Australian low uptake of screening. Research including randomised trials within the program promises to increase participation.

IMPACT

This screening program comparison suggests that within-program intervention trials will lead to increased Australian screening participation.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)是男性和女性中第二大常见的癌症,也是澳大利亚癌症死亡的第二大常见原因;澳大利亚的 CRC 发病率和死亡率均处于世界最高水平之列。澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划于 2006 年开始实施;然而,在 2018 年至 2019 年期间,首次被该计划接触的人群中,只有 33%的人返回了试剂盒。在这段时间内,寄出的 570 万套件中,只有 44%被返回。我们的目的是确定在具有类似计划但参与率更高的国家中,全国结直肠癌筛查计划的实践和特点,以确定优化澳大利亚 CRC 筛查参与率的潜在干预措施。

方法

我们使用邮政邀请和免费返还 iFOBT 家用试剂盒,搜索了至少报告 50%筛查参与率的 CRC 筛查计划的已发表和灰色文献。我们对癌症登记处工作人员和学术研究人员进行了访谈,重点是参与者和从业者对筛查的参与。

结果

荷兰、苏格兰、丹麦和芬兰的全国性计划报告了所有邀请轮次的筛查参与率均超过 50%。共同特点包括:相对于澳大利亚,人口和地理面积较小;相对较高的文化程度;单一样本 iFOBT 试剂盒;人口癌症筛查研究的国家登记系统;以及包括方案特征的随机试验的筛查方案研究。

结论

除了单一样本试剂盒外,我们没有发现解决澳大利亚持续低筛查参与率的单一方法。包括在该计划内进行的随机试验的研究有望提高参与度。

影响

这项筛查计划比较表明,计划内干预试验将提高澳大利亚的筛查参与度。