Environmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Environmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
Microvasc Res. 2022 Nov;144:104422. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2022.104422. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
Examine the effects of sensory nerve blockade on cutaneous post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) and local thermal hyperemia (LTH) following prolonged upper limb ischemia.
In nine males [28 years (standard deviation:6)], volar forearm skin blood flux normalized to maximum vasodilation (%SkBF) was assessed at control (CTRL) and sensory nerve blockade (EMLA) treated sites during the PORH response following 20-min of complete arm ischemia and during rapid LTH (33-42 °C, 1 °C·20 s, held for ~30-min + 20-min at 44 °C) before and after ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury.
EMLA increased mean [95 % confidence-interval] PORH amplitude by 21%SkBF ([9,33]; p = 0.003), delayed time to peak by 111 s ([40,182]; p = 0.007) and increased area under the curve by 19,462%SkBF·s ([11,346,27,579]; p < 0.001) compared to CTRL. For LTH, EMLA delayed onset time by 76 s ([46,106]; p < 0.001) Pre-IR and by 46 s ([27,65]; p < 0.001) Post-IR compared to CTRL. Post-IR onset time was delayed for CTRL by 26 s ([8,43]; p = 0.007), but was not different for EMLA (p > 0.050) compared to Pre-IR. EMLA delayed time to initial peak by 24 s ([4,43]; p = 0.022, Main time effect) and it attenuated the initial peak by 27%SkBF ([12,43]; p = 0.002) Pre-IR and by 16%SkBF ([3,29]; p = 0.020) post-IR compared to CTRL. Post-IR, the initial peak was not different for CTRL (p > 0.050), but it was increased by 16%SkBF ([5,26]; p = 0.005) for EMLA compared to Pre-IR. Neither EMLA nor IR altered the steady-state heating plateau (all p > 0.050).
For the current model of IR injury, sensory nerves appear to have a negligible influence on the LTH response in non-glabrous forearm skin once vasodilation has been initiated.
探讨感觉神经阻滞对上肢长时间缺血后皮肤闭塞后反应性充血(PORH)和局部热充血(LTH)的影响。
在 9 名男性[28 岁(标准差:6 岁)]中,在 20 分钟完全手臂缺血后和缺血再灌注(IR)损伤前后,评估前臂掌侧皮肤血流相对于最大血管扩张的归一化血流量(%SkBF)在对照(CTRL)和感觉神经阻滞(EMLA)治疗部位的 PORH 反应期间以及在快速 LTH(33-42°C,1°C·20 s,保持约 30 分钟+ 44°C 下 20 分钟)期间。
与 CTRL 相比,EMLA 使 PORH 幅度增加 21%SkBF([9,33];p=0.003),使达峰时间延迟 111 秒([40,182];p=0.007),并使 AUC 增加 19,462%SkBF·s([11,346,27,579];p<0.001)。对于 LTH,与 CTRL 相比,EMLA 使起始时间延迟 76 秒([46,106];p<0.001)Pre-IR 和 46 秒([27,65];p<0.001)Post-IR。与 Pre-IR 相比,CTRL 的起始时间延迟了 26 秒([8,43];p=0.007),但 EMLA 没有差异(p>0.050)。与 CTRL 相比,EMLA 使初始峰值延迟 24 秒([4,43];p=0.022,主要时间效应)并使初始峰值减少 27%SkBF([12,43];p=0.002)Pre-IR 和 16%SkBF([3,29];p=0.020)Post-IR。与 Pre-IR 相比,IR 后 CTRL 的初始峰值没有差异(p>0.050),但 EMLA 使初始峰值增加了 16%SkBF([5,26];p=0.005)。EMLA 和 IR 均未改变稳态加热平台(均 p>0.050)。
对于当前的 IR 损伤模型,一旦血管扩张开始,感觉神经似乎对非无毛前臂皮肤的 LTH 反应几乎没有影响。