• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用情境判断测验识别住院医师申请人筛选过程中的潜在流失者。

Identifying Potential Attrition during the Residency Applicant Screening Process Using a Situational Judgment Test.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.

Department of Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):e103-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.07.020
PMID:35970719
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

As USMLE Step 1 moves to pass/fail, residency programs are seeking alternate interview selection processes. Attrition in general surgery is reported as high as 26%. Thus, it is important to ensure that programs are selecting and matching applicants with shared values. Situational judgment tests (SJTs) measure educational and cultural values by posing ambiguous situations and individuals rate the effectiveness of possible reactions. SJTs have previously been shown to identify job applicants with shared values while promoting diversity. Scoring categories are high, moderate, or low values congruence. We sought to explore predictive validity of the SJT relative to program attrition.

DESIGN

Residents who matched into our program between 2018 and 2021 completed the SJT. We tracked attrition.

SETTING

UT Health San Antonio, Texas PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six categorical general surgery residents RESULTS: Per SJT ratings, the numbers of residents who had high, moderate, and low values congruence were 27, 16, and 13, respectively. Attrition numbers for residents who scored high and moderate congruence were similar, indicating that these ratings were indistinguishable. As such, we combined those 2 categories to create a 2 × 2 matrix and used signal detection theory as a framework for analysis. Overall attrition was 16.1% (9/56). Of the 43 residents who scored high or moderate congruence, 90.7% remained in the program. There was a 9.3% chance of attrition for these residents. Of the 13 residents who scored low congruence, 38.5% attrited. While scoring as low congruence on the SJT does not definitively indicate attrition, it does indicate that attrition is 4.14 times more likely for these residents (chi-square, p = 0.0121).

CONCLUSIONS

One of the most important aspects of residency applicant selection and interviewing is mitigating risk by identifying applicants who carry a high risk of attrition. The SJT significantly identifies at-risk applicants.

摘要

目的

随着美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步改为通过/不通过制,住院医师项目正在寻找替代的面试选择流程。普通外科的流失率据报道高达 26%。因此,确保项目选择和匹配具有共同价值观的申请人非常重要。情景判断测试(SJT)通过提出模棱两可的情况来衡量教育和文化价值观,然后让个人对可能的反应的有效性进行评分。SJT 先前已被证明可以识别具有共同价值观的求职者,同时促进多样性。评分类别为高、中或低价值观一致性。我们试图探索 SJT 与项目流失率的预测有效性。

设计

2018 年至 2021 年匹配到我们项目的住院医师完成了 SJT。我们跟踪了流失情况。

地点

德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市 UT 健康

参与者

56 名普通外科住院医师

结果

根据 SJT 评分,具有高、中、低价值观一致性的住院医师人数分别为 27、16 和 13。评分高和中一致的住院医师的流失人数相似,表明这些评分无法区分。因此,我们将这两个类别合并为一个 2×2 矩阵,并使用信号检测理论作为分析框架。总体流失率为 16.1%(9/56)。在评分高或中一致的 43 名住院医师中,90.7%留在了项目中。这些住院医师有 9.3%的流失率。在评分低一致的 13 名住院医师中,有 38.5%流失。虽然 SJT 评分低并不一定表明会流失,但这确实表明这些住院医师的流失风险高出 4.14 倍(卡方检验,p=0.0121)。

结论

住院医师申请人选择和面试的最重要方面之一是通过识别具有高流失风险的申请人来降低风险。SJT 可显著识别高风险申请人。

相似文献

1
Identifying Potential Attrition during the Residency Applicant Screening Process Using a Situational Judgment Test.运用情境判断测验识别住院医师申请人筛选过程中的潜在流失者。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):e103-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
2
Improving Our Ability to Predict Resident Applicant Performance: Validity Evidence for a Situational Judgment Test.提高我们预测住院医师申请人表现的能力:情境判断测验的效标证据。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(5):508-521. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1760104. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Can Better Selection Tools Help Us Achieve Our Diversity Goals in Postgraduate Medical Education? Comparing Use of USMLE Step 1 Scores and Situational Judgment Tests at 7 Surgical Residencies.更好的选择工具能否帮助我们实现研究生医学教育中的多样性目标?比较 7 个外科住院医师项目中美医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步成绩和情境判断测验的使用。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):751-757. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003092.
4
Going Above and Beyond With SJTs: Impact of Applicant Characteristics on Open Response SJT Participation.超越 SJT:申请人特征对开放式反应 SJT 参与的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Aug;81(8):1024-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
5
Maximizing Standardization While Ensuring Equity: Exploring the Role of Applicant Experiences, Attributes, and Metrics on Performance of a Surgery-Specific Situational Judgment Test.最大化标准化的同时确保公平性:探索申请人经历、属性和指标对特定于手术的情景判断测试表现的作用。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Nov;80(11):1703-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
6
Making progress on identifying those who aren't making progress: Using situational judgment tests to predict those at risk for remediation and attrition.在识别那些没有取得进步的人方面取得进展:使用情景判断测试来预测那些有补救和流失风险的人。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 7;7:275. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000275.1. eCollection 2018.
7
Evaluation of Validity Evidence for Personality, Emotional Intelligence, and Situational Judgment Tests to Identify Successful Residents.评估人格、情绪智力和情境判断测验在识别成功住院医师方面的有效性证据。
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):409-416. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5013.
8
Predicting Surgical Resident Performance With Situational Judgment Tests.用情境判断测验预测外科住院医师的表现。
Acad Med. 2024 Aug 1;99(8):884-888. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005680. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
A Survey of Vascular Surgery Program Directors: Perspectives following USMLE Step 1 Conversion to Pass/Fail and Virtual Only Interviews.血管外科项目主任调查:美国医师执照考试第一步改为及格/不及格以及仅采用虚拟面试后的观点。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;88:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
10
Defining the Applicant Pool for Postgraduate Year-2 Categorical General Surgery Positions.定义研究生第二年普通外科住院医师岗位的申请人池。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul-Aug;75(4):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 11.