• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病足溃疡常规评估中面积测量方法的比较——一种一致性分析方法

Comparison of area measurement methods in the routine assessment of diabetic foot ulcers-A consistency analysis method.

作者信息

Luo Yi Xin, Li Li, Mai Li Fang, Liu Xing Zhou, Yang Chuan

机构信息

School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Emergency, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Pract. 2023 Feb;29(1):e13098. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13098. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1111/ijn.13098
PMID:35971276
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ulcer area is a critical parameter in diabetic foot ulcer assessment but existing methods have deficiencies for routine measurement.

AIM

We hypothesized that the Image J-based Computer Analysis method has a high level of agreement with the commonly used Maximum Length and Width and the Transparent Dressing-based Square Grid methods and aimed to test the consistency and verify the feasibility of the Image J-based Computer Analysis method in the routine assessment of ulcers.

METHODS

Outpatient attendees with diabetic foot ulcers at the Department of Endocrinology of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital were enrolled between October 2020 and October 2021. The three methods sequentially assessed the area of 65 included ulcers. Results were analysed using one-way analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots to perform consistency analysis.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation ulcer area measured using the three methods were 14.79 ± 5.39, 14.35 ± 5.26, and 14.30 ± 5.26 cm , respectively. The measurement differences among the three groups or between any two were not statistically significant. Bland-Altman plots showed good consistency between the Image J-based Computer Analysis and the other two methods.

CONCLUSION

The Image J-based Computer Analysis method can be interchanged with the other methods to assess ulcer areas. It is freely accessible, accurate and home-operable, thus worth consideration by nurses for routine ulcer area assessment.

摘要

背景

溃疡面积是糖尿病足溃疡评估中的一个关键参数,但现有方法在常规测量方面存在不足。

目的

我们假设基于Image J的计算机分析方法与常用的最大长度和宽度法以及基于透明敷料的方格法具有高度一致性,并旨在测试基于Image J的计算机分析方法在溃疡常规评估中的一致性并验证其可行性。

方法

2020年10月至2021年10月,招募了中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院内分泌科门诊的糖尿病足溃疡患者。三种方法依次评估了65例纳入研究的溃疡面积。使用单因素方差分析和Bland-Altman图进行结果分析以进行一致性分析。

结果

三种方法测量的溃疡面积的平均值±标准差分别为14.79±5.39、14.35±5.26和14.30±5.26cm²。三组之间或任意两组之间的测量差异均无统计学意义。Bland-Altman图显示基于Image J的计算机分析方法与其他两种方法之间具有良好的一致性。

结论

基于Image J的计算机分析方法可与其他方法互换使用以评估溃疡面积。它免费可用、准确且可在家操作,因此值得护士在溃疡面积常规评估中考虑。

相似文献

1
Comparison of area measurement methods in the routine assessment of diabetic foot ulcers-A consistency analysis method.糖尿病足溃疡常规评估中面积测量方法的比较——一种一致性分析方法
Int J Nurs Pract. 2023 Feb;29(1):e13098. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13098. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
2
Application of a Diabetic Foot Smart APP in the measurement of diabetic foot ulcers.糖尿病足智能 APP 在糖尿病足溃疡测量中的应用。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2024 Aug;54:101095. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101095. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Validity and reliability of Chinese version of the new diabetic foot ulcer assessment scale.新版糖尿病足溃疡评估量表中文版的有效性和可靠性。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3724-3730. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14266. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement in diabetic foot ulcers: mean values and cut-point for wound healing.经皮氧分压测量在糖尿病足溃疡中的应用:愈合的平均值和切点。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;40(6):585-9. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182a9a7bf.
5
Evaluation of three different techniques for measuring wound area in diabetic foot ulcers: a reproducibility study.评价三种不同技术测量糖尿病足溃疡创面面积:一项可重复性研究。
J Wound Care. 2020 Sep 2;29(9):518-524. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.9.518.
6
Smart diabetic foot ulcer scoring system.智能糖尿病足溃疡评分系统。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62076-1.
7
[Recurrence and influencing factors of diabetic foot ulcer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus].2型糖尿病患者糖尿病足溃疡的复发及影响因素
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 20;36(10):947-952. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190726-00315.
8
Area of the diabetic ulcers estimated applying a foot scanner-based home telecare system and three reference methods.应用足部扫描仪的家庭远程医疗系统和三种参考方法估计糖尿病溃疡面积。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Nov;13(11):1101-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0082. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
9
Construction and verification of an intelligent measurement model for diabetic foot ulcer.构建并验证糖尿病足溃疡智能测量模型。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 28;46(10):1138-1146. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.200938.
10
An Automatic Assessment System of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Wound Area Determination, Color Segmentation, and Healing Score Evaluation.一种基于伤口面积测定、颜色分割和愈合评分评估的糖尿病足溃疡自动评估系统。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 7;10(2):421-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296815599004.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term effect of dressing with Dermaheal ointment in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: A double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.德玛愈合软膏换药治疗糖尿病足溃疡的短期疗效:一项双盲随机对照临床试验。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 13;7(2):e1868. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1868. eCollection 2024 Feb.