Suppr超能文献

评价 Eurotransplant Senior 项目中已故供者肾移植与标准分配的比较。

Evaluation of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in the Eurotransplant Senior Program in Comparison to Standard Allocation.

机构信息

Department of Medicine IV, University Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Transplant. 2022 Aug 16;27:e936514. doi: 10.12659/AOT.936514.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The organ shortage and long waiting times have dramatically increased the age of potential kidney transplant recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was initiated to allocate kidneys from deceased donors aged ≥65 years to recipients with a comparable age independent of pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching; however, parameters affecting the long-term benefits of this strategy remain poorly defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated outcome and risk factors for mortality in kidney recipients aged ≥65 years that were transplanted according to the ESP protocol relative to patients aged >50 years transplanted according to the Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS) criteria at the University Freiburg Medical Center, Germany, between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS Graft survival, graft function, the maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, and the incidence of rejections and infections did not differ between groups. Infectious diseases were the main cause of death in both groups; however, infection-associated mortality was more than double in the ESP group, and 5-year patient survival was 61.4% in the ESP group compared to 83.2% in the ETKAS group. Multivariate analysis identified age, the number of HLA mismatches, and the CMV serostatus with a seropositive donor and negative recipient as the main risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS A comparable immunosuppressive regimen used in ESP and ETKAS patients was associated with similar rejection rates and infectious disease complications, and infections were the most common cause of death in both groups. CMV-negative patients receiving an organ from a CMV-positive donor and patients with a high number of HLA mismatches require close follow-up to reduce mortality.

摘要

背景

器官短缺和漫长的等待时间导致潜在的肾移植受者年龄大幅增加。欧洲器官移植高级项目(ESP)的启动旨在分配≥65 岁的已故供者的肾脏给具有可比年龄的受者,而不受移植前人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配的影响;然而,影响该策略长期获益的参数仍未得到明确界定。

材料与方法

我们回顾性地评估了德国弗莱堡大学医学中心在 2008 年至 2018 年间,根据 ESP 方案接受肾移植的年龄≥65 岁的肾移植受者的结果和死亡率,以及根据 Eurotransplant 肾脏分配系统(ETKAS)标准接受移植的年龄>50 岁的患者的死亡率,该中心根据 ESP 方案进行肾移植,而根据 Eurotransplant 肾脏分配系统(ETKAS)标准进行肾移植。

结果

移植物存活率、移植物功能、维持免疫抑制治疗、排斥反应和感染的发生率在两组之间没有差异。两组的主要死亡原因均为传染病;然而,ESP 组感染相关死亡率是 ETKAS 组的两倍多,ESP 组 5 年患者存活率为 61.4%,而 ETKAS 组为 83.2%。多变量分析确定年龄、HLA 错配数量以及 CMV 血清状态(供者血清阳性、受者血清阴性)是死亡率的主要危险因素。

结论

ESP 和 ETKAS 患者使用相似的免疫抑制方案,排斥反应率和感染性并发症相似,感染是两组患者最常见的死亡原因。接受 CMV 阳性供者器官的 CMV 阴性患者和 HLA 错配数量多的患者需要密切随访,以降低死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0116/9392420/c62cea5ddbd3/anntransplant-27-e936514-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验