Dupont Benoît, Lusthaus Jonathan
Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada .
University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2022 Aug;40(4):892-913. doi: 10.1177/0894439321994623. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The core of this article is a detailed investigation of the dispute resolution system contained within Darkode, an elite cybercriminal forum. Extracting the dedicated disputes section from within the marketplace, where users can report bad behavior and register complaints, we carry out content analysis on these threads. This involves both descriptive statistics across the data set and qualitative analysis of particular posts of interest, leading to a number of new insights. First, the overall level of disputes is quite high, even though members are vetted for entry in the first instance. Second, the lower ranked members of the marketplace are the most highly represented category for both the plaintiffs and defendants. Third, vendors are accused of malfeasance far more often than buyers, and their "crimes" are most commonly either not providing the product/service or providing a poor one. Fourth, the monetary size of the disputes is surprisingly small. Finally, only 23.1% of disputes reach a clear outcome.
本文的核心是对精英网络犯罪论坛Darkode中的争端解决系统进行详细调查。我们从该市场中提取专门的争端板块(用户可在此举报不良行为并登记投诉),对这些主题帖进行内容分析。这包括对数据集进行描述性统计以及对特定感兴趣的帖子进行定性分析,从而得出一些新的见解。首先,尽管成员在最初加入时经过了审查,但争端的总体水平相当高。其次,市场中排名较低的成员在原告和被告中所占比例最高。第三,供应商被指控渎职的频率远高于买家,他们的“罪行”最常见的是不提供产品/服务或提供劣质产品/服务。第四,争端涉及的金额小得出奇。最后,只有23.1%的争端达成了明确的结果。