Nexhip Abbey, Riley Merilyn, Robinson Kerin
La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Australia.
Health Inf Manag. 2024 May;53(2):76-84. doi: 10.1177/18333583221115898. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
The professional identity and motivation of qualified health information managers (HIMs) is largely unexplored.
A larger study has investigated the motivators of HIMs in the construction of their professional identity and associated relationships to job satisfaction and engagement with their profession. The aims of this component of the study were to: (i) identify and analyse the characteristics of members of the profession who have different motivation profiles; (ii) obtain HIMs' perspectives on their professional identity; and (iii) measure correlation between HIMs' professional identity and different motivating factors. A cross-sectional study design, with a convergent mixed-methods approach to data collection was employed. An online survey was administered to the 1985, 1995, 2005 and 2015 Australian health information management and medical record administration graduate cohorts from one university in Victoria.
Response rate: 72.7% ( = ). There were no statistically significant correlations between the HIMs' motivation profile and professional identity. The HIMs were largely motivated by a need for achievement (striving for excellence) and continuous improvement; maintained high standards of work quality (95.8%); valued their work (94.4%) and work collaborations (84.7%); satisfactorily applied skills-knowledge (94%); demonstrated a very strong professional association (92% were proud to belong to the profession). Key factors in motivation that were consistently reported by members of all cohorts in the open-ended questions were as follows: intrinsic motivation; colleagues and teamwork; the variety of work performed; and contribution to the bigger picture. Overall, and notwithstanding between-cohort differences: 65.3% confidently directed others, 45.8% aspired to leadership and 38% actively networked. They related difficulty in explaining the profession to outsiders.
There was no correlation between motivation profile and professional identity. Significantly, the HIMs demonstrated exceptionally strong positive professional identity, reflected particularly in pride in membership of the profession and their belief in the importance of their professional work.
合格的健康信息管理人员(HIM)的职业身份和动机在很大程度上尚未得到探索。
一项规模更大的研究调查了HIM在构建其职业身份过程中的动机以及与工作满意度和职业参与度的相关关系。本研究这一部分的目的是:(i)识别和分析具有不同动机特征的该职业成员的特点;(ii)获取HIM对其职业身份的看法;(iii)测量HIM的职业身份与不同激励因素之间的相关性。采用了横断面研究设计,并运用了收敛性混合方法进行数据收集。对来自维多利亚州一所大学的1985年、1995年、2005年和2015年澳大利亚健康信息管理和病历管理专业毕业生群体进行了在线调查。
回复率:72.7%(=)。HIM的动机特征与职业身份之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。HIM的主要动机是对成就的需求(追求卓越)和持续改进;保持高标准的工作质量(95.8%);重视他们的工作(94.4%)和工作协作(84.7%);满意地应用技能知识(94%);表现出非常强烈的职业认同感(92%为属于该职业而自豪)。在开放式问题中,所有群体的成员一致报告的激励关键因素如下:内在动机;同事和团队合作;所从事工作的多样性;以及对大局的贡献。总体而言,尽管存在群体差异:65.3%的人自信地指导他人,45.8%的人渴望担任领导职务,38% 的人积极建立人际关系网。他们提到向外界解释该职业存在困难。
动机特征与职业身份之间没有相关性。值得注意的是,HIM表现出异常强烈的积极职业身份,尤其体现在对职业成员身份的自豪感以及他们对专业工作重要性的信念上。