INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2022 Oct;38(10):792-797. doi: 10.1089/AID.2022.0075. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
In HIV medicine, the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) index is associated to some geriatric syndromes and has also been recently used as a proxy of frailty. However, using it as a proxy for the frailty phenotype may inadvertently interchange two different concepts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate to what extent the frailty phenotype may be explained by the index. Cross-sectional analysis included 393 participants with HIV aged 50 or older. Somers' delta () was calculated, and a multinomial logistic regression model was run to determine to what extent the VACS index scores explained the probability of being prefrail or frail. Mean age was 57.6 (standard deviation 6.5) years and 87.3% men. A weak, but positive association between the VACS 2.0 index score and the frailty phenotype was established (Somers' = 0.120, < .001). The multinomial logistic regression showed that prefrail and frail participants had higher probabilities for greater VACS index scores [OR = 1.05, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.01-1.09; = .006 and OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.26; < .001, respectively]; however, VACS index only explained <12% of the variability observed in the frailty phenotype. High VACS index scores were associated with a greater probability of being frail; however, with a weak association. Thus, we should be cautious when using the VACS index as a general proxy of frailty, particularly for the frailty phenotype. However, the VACS index may be used as a means to identify persons who might benefit from further comprehensive geriatric assessment.
在艾滋病毒医学中,退伍军人老龄化队列研究(VACS)指数与一些老年综合征相关联,最近也被用作脆弱的替代指标。然而,将其用作脆弱表型的替代指标可能会无意中混淆两个不同的概念。本研究旨在评估脆弱表型在多大程度上可以用该指数来解释。横断面分析纳入了 393 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的艾滋病毒感染者。计算了 Somers' delta(),并运行了多项逻辑回归模型,以确定 VACS 指数得分在多大程度上可以解释衰弱前期或衰弱的概率。平均年龄为 57.6 岁(标准差为 6.5 岁),男性占 87.3%。VACS 2.0 指数评分与脆弱表型之间存在微弱但呈正相关(Somers' = 0.120, < .001)。多项逻辑回归显示,衰弱前期和衰弱患者具有更高的可能性获得更大的 VACS 指数评分[比值比(OR)= 1.05,95%置信区间(CI)1.01-1.09; = .006 和 OR = 1.17,95%CI 1.09-1.26; < .001];然而,VACS 指数仅解释了脆弱表型观察到的变异性的 <12%。高 VACS 指数评分与衰弱的可能性更大相关;然而,关联较弱。因此,当使用 VACS 指数作为脆弱的一般替代指标时,特别是对脆弱表型,我们应该谨慎。然而,VACS 指数可以用作识别可能受益于进一步全面老年评估的人的手段。