Suppr超能文献

商业体重管理项目与自行管理方法的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2226561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26561.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Given the prevalence of obesity, accessible and effective treatment options are needed to manage obesity and its comorbid conditions. Commercial weight management programs are a potential solution to the lack of available treatment, providing greater access at lower cost than clinic-based approaches, but few commercial programs have been rigorously evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the differences in weight change between individuals randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program and those randomly assigned to a do-it-yourself (DIY) approach.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 1-year, randomized clinical trial conducted in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom between June 19, 2018, and November 30, 2019, enrolled 373 adults aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 45. Assessors were blinded to treatment conditions.

INTERVENTIONS

A widely available commercial weight management program that included reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring and recommendations for a variety of DIY approaches to weight loss.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the difference in weight change between the 2 groups at 3 and 12 months. The a priori hypothesis was that the commercial program would result in greater weight loss than the DIY approach at 3 and 12 months. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

The study include 373 participants (272 women [72.9%]; mean [SD] BMI, 33.8 [5.2]; 77 [20.6%] aged 18-34 years, 74 [19.8%] aged 35-43 years, 82 [22.0%] aged 44-52 years, and 140 [37.5%] aged 53-75 years). At 12 months, retention rates were 88.8% (166 of 187) for the commercial weight management program group and 95.7% (178 of 186) for the DIY group. At 3 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of -3.8 (4.1) kg vs -1.8 (3.7) kg among those in the DIY group. At 12 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of -4.4 (7.3) kg vs -1.7 (7.3) kg among those in the DIY group. The mean difference between groups was -2.0 kg (97.5% CI, -2.9 to -1.1 kg) at 3 months (P < .001) and -2.6 kg (97.5% CI, -4.3 to -0.8 kg) at 12 months (P < .001). A greater percentage of participants in the commercial program group than participants in the DIY group achieved loss of 5% of body weight at both 3 months (40.7% [72 of 177] vs 18.6% [34 of 183]) and 12 months (42.8% [71 of 166] vs 24.7% [44 of 178]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Adults randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program with reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring lost more weight and were more likely to achieve weight loss of 5% at 3 and 12 months than adults following a DIY approach. This study contributes data on the efficacy of commercial weight management programs and DIY weight management approaches.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571893.

摘要

重要性

鉴于肥胖的普遍性,需要提供方便且有效的治疗方法来管理肥胖及其合并症。商业体重管理计划是解决治疗方法缺乏的一种潜在解决方案,与基于诊所的方法相比,它可以以更低的成本提供更多的服务,但很少有商业计划经过严格评估。

目的

比较随机分配到商业体重管理计划和自行管理(DIY)方法的个体之间体重变化的差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国、加拿大和英国进行的为期 1 年的随机临床试验,于 2018 年 6 月 19 日至 2019 年 11 月 30 日期间招募了 373 名年龄在 18 至 75 岁之间的成年人,体重指数(BMI;计算方法为体重(千克)除以身高(米)的平方)为 25 至 45。评估人员对治疗条件进行了盲法评估。

干预措施

一种广泛使用的商业体重管理计划,包括减少对饮食自我监测的要求,并为各种 DIY 减肥方法提供建议。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是两组在 3 个月和 12 个月时体重变化的差异。预先假设是商业计划在 3 个月和 12 个月时比 DIY 方法更能减轻体重。分析是基于意向治疗进行的。

结果

该研究纳入了 373 名参与者(272 名女性[72.9%];平均[标准差]BMI,33.8[5.2];77 名[20.6%]年龄在 18-34 岁,74 名[19.8%]年龄在 35-43 岁,82 名[22.0%]年龄在 44-52 岁,140 名[37.5%]年龄在 53-75 岁)。在 12 个月时,商业体重管理计划组的保留率为 88.8%(166/187),DIY 组为 95.7%(178/186)。在 3 个月时,商业计划组参与者的平均(标准差)体重减轻为-3.8(4.1)kg,而 DIY 组为-1.8(3.7)kg。在 12 个月时,商业计划组参与者的平均(标准差)体重减轻为-4.4(7.3)kg,而 DIY 组为-1.7(7.3)kg。组间平均差异为-2.0kg(97.5%置信区间,-2.9 至-1.1kg),在 3 个月时差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001),在 12 个月时差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。与 DIY 组相比,商业计划组中更多的参与者达到了体重减轻 5%的目标,分别为 3 个月时 40.7%(72/177)和 12 个月时 42.8%(71/166),而 DIY 组分别为 18.6%(34/183)和 24.7%(44/178)。

结论和相关性

与遵循 DIY 方法的成年人相比,随机分配到饮食自我监测要求较低的商业体重管理计划的成年人在 3 个月和 12 个月时体重减轻更多,并且更有可能达到体重减轻 5%的目标。本研究提供了有关商业体重管理计划和 DIY 体重管理方法疗效的数据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03571893。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a4f/9382439/b1ab9c0e8463/jamanetwopen-e2226561-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验