Suppr超能文献

一种用于分析最大呼气流量密度依赖性的等容方法。

An isovolume method for analysis of density dependence of maximal expiratory flows.

作者信息

Rubinstein I, Vanek A W, McClean P A, Boucher R, Zamel N, Slutsky A S

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 May;62(5):2115-20. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.5.2115.

Abstract

The usual method of measuring density dependence of maximum expiratory flows is superimposition at total lung capacity or residual volume of maximum expiratory flow volume (MEFV) curves obtained breathing air and a mixture of 80% He plus 20% O2 (HeO2). A major problem with this technique is the large variability in results, which has been thought to be due to errors in matching lung volumes on both gases. Accordingly, we obtained MEFV curves breathing air and HeO2 using a bag-in-the-box system so that the curves breathing the two gas mixtures could be directly superimposed without removing the mouthpiece (isovolume). Ten healthy, nonsmoking subjects performed MEFV curves on each gas mixture for six consecutive experiments. We compared the increase in flow at 50% of vital capacity (delta Vmax50) and volume of isoflow (Viso) by superimposing and matching the MEFV curves at total lung capacity, at residual volume, and using the isovolume method. The variability of each method was assessed by the mean intersubject and intrasubject coefficients of variation. In all subjects, the mean delta Vmax50 and Viso as well as their corresponding coefficients of variation were not significantly different among the three methods. We conclude that, in healthy nonsmoking young adults, the method chosen for superimposing and matching MEFV curves has no effect on the variability of delta Vmax50 and Viso.

摘要

测量最大呼气流量的密度依赖性的常用方法是,将在肺总量或残气量时获得的呼吸空气和80%氦气加20%氧气(氦氧混合气)的最大呼气流量容积(MEFV)曲线进行叠加。该技术的一个主要问题是结果的变异性很大,这被认为是由于两种气体肺容积匹配存在误差所致。因此,我们使用箱中袋系统获得呼吸空气和氦氧混合气时的MEFV曲线,这样呼吸两种气体混合物时的曲线可以直接叠加,而无需取下口器(等容积)。10名健康、不吸烟的受试者对每种气体混合物进行MEFV曲线测试,连续进行6次实验。我们通过在肺总量、残气量时叠加和匹配MEFV曲线以及使用等容积法,比较了肺活量50%时流量的增加量(ΔVmax50)和等流量容积(Viso)。每种方法的变异性通过受试者间和受试者内变异系数均值进行评估。在所有受试者中,三种方法之间的平均ΔVmax50和Viso及其相应的变异系数均无显著差异。我们得出结论,在健康、不吸烟的年轻成年人中,选择用于叠加和匹配MEFV曲线的方法对ΔVmax50和Viso的变异性没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验