• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种交互式、高度定制的“视频医生”干预措施对抑制 HIV 病毒载量和留住接受临床护理的 HIV 患者的有效性:一项随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of an Interactive, Highly Tailored "Video Doctor" Intervention to Suppress Viral Load and Retain Patients With HIV in Clinical Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

RTI International.

Division of HIV Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Sep 1;91(1):58-67. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003045. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1097/QAI.0000000000003045
PMID:35972854
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9377499/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine whether Positive Health Check, a highly tailored video doctor intervention, can improve viral suppression and retention in care.

SETTING

Four clinics that deliver HIV primary care.

METHODS

A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized trial design was used to test study hypotheses. Participants (N = 799) who were not virally suppressed, were new to care, or had fallen out of care were randomly assigned to receive Positive Health Check or the standard of care alone. The primary endpoint was viral load suppression, and the secondary endpoint was retention in care, both assessed at 12 months, using an intention-to-treat approach. A priori subgroup analyses based on sex assigned at birth and race were examined as well.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between Positive Health Check (N = 397) and standard of care (N = 402) for either endpoint. However, statistically significant group differences were identified from a priori subgroup analyses. Male participants receiving Positive Health Check were more likely to achieve suppression at 12 months than male participants receiving standard of care adjusted risk ratio [aRR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.14 (1.00 to 1.29), P = 0.046}. For retention in care, there was a statistically significant lower risk for a 6-month visit gap in the Positive Health Check arm for the youngest participants, 18-29 years old [aRR (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.33 to 0.92), P = 0.024] and the oldest participants, 60-81 years old [aRR (95% CI) = 0.49 (0.30 to 0.81), P = 0.006].

CONCLUSIONS

Positive Health Check may help male participants with HIV achieve viral suppression, and younger and older patients consistently attend HIV care.

REGISTRY NAME

Positive Health Check Evaluation Trial. Trial ID: 1U18PS004967-01. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03292913.

摘要

背景

为了确定高度定制的视频医生干预措施“积极健康检查”是否可以提高病毒抑制率和治疗保留率。

设置

提供艾滋病毒初级保健的四家诊所。

方法

采用混合 1 型有效性实施随机试验设计来检验研究假设。不符合病毒抑制标准、新接受治疗或已脱离治疗的参与者(N = 799)被随机分配接受积极健康检查或单独接受标准护理。主要终点是病毒载量抑制,次要终点是 12 个月时的治疗保留率,均采用意向治疗方法进行评估。还检查了基于出生时性别和种族的预先设定的亚组分析。

结果

在主要终点和次要终点上,积极健康检查组(N = 397)和标准护理组(N = 402)之间均无统计学显著差异。然而,预先设定的亚组分析确定了统计学显著的组间差异。接受积极健康检查的男性参与者在 12 个月时实现抑制的可能性高于接受标准护理的男性参与者,调整后的风险比[aRR](95%置信区间[CI])= 1.14(1.00 至 1.29),P = 0.046]。对于治疗保留,在积极健康检查组中,年龄最小的 18-29 岁参与者和年龄最大的 60-81 岁参与者在 6 个月就诊时出现就诊间隔的风险较低[调整后的风险比[aRR](95%CI)= 0.55(0.33 至 0.92),P = 0.024]和[调整后的风险比[aRR](95%CI)= 0.49(0.30 至 0.81),P = 0.006]。

结论

积极健康检查可能有助于艾滋病毒男性参与者实现病毒抑制,并且年轻和老年患者始终坚持接受艾滋病毒治疗。

注册号

积极健康检查评估试验。试验 ID:1U18PS004967-01。网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03292913。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5007/9377499/d56ac7dbd834/qai-91-58-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5007/9377499/56c4e9f4b904/qai-91-58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5007/9377499/97e3d7fa269d/qai-91-58-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5007/9377499/d56ac7dbd834/qai-91-58-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5007/9377499/56c4e9f4b904/qai-91-58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5007/9377499/97e3d7fa269d/qai-91-58-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5007/9377499/d56ac7dbd834/qai-91-58-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an Interactive, Highly Tailored "Video Doctor" Intervention to Suppress Viral Load and Retain Patients With HIV in Clinical Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一种交互式、高度定制的“视频医生”干预措施对抑制 HIV 病毒载量和留住接受临床护理的 HIV 患者的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Sep 1;91(1):58-67. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003045. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
2
Cost Analysis of the Positive Health Check Intervention to Suppress HIV Viral Load and Retain Patients in HIV Clinical Care.抑制 HIV 病毒载量并保持 HIV 临床护理患者的正向健康检查干预的成本分析。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(3):326-335. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001695. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
3
Positive Health Check evaluation: A type 1 hybrid design randomized trial to decrease HIV viral loads in patients seen in HIV primary care.积极健康检查评估:一种 1 型混合设计随机试验,旨在降低在 HIV 初级保健中就诊的患者的 HIV 病毒载量。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106097. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106097. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Effectiveness of a peer educator-coordinated preference-based differentiated service delivery model on viral suppression among young people living with HIV in Lesotho: The PEBRA cluster-randomized trial.PEBRA 团组随机试验:同伴教育协调的基于偏好的差异化服务提供模式对莱索托艾滋病毒感染者青年中病毒抑制效果的影响。
PLoS Med. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):e1004150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004150. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Financial incentives for achieving and maintaining viral suppression among HIV-positive adults in Uganda: a randomised controlled trial.乌干达艾滋病毒阳性成年人实现并维持病毒抑制的财务激励措施:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet HIV. 2019 Mar;6(3):e155-e163. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30330-8. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
The impact of community- versus clinic-based adherence clubs on loss from care and viral suppression for antiretroviral therapy patients: Findings from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in South Africa.社区与诊所为基础的依从俱乐部对艾滋病抗病毒治疗患者脱失和病毒抑制的影响:来自南非一项实用随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS Med. 2019 May 21;16(5):e1002808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002808. eCollection 2019 May.
7
Population uptake of HIV testing, treatment, viral suppression, and male circumcision following a community-based intervention in Botswana (Ya Tsie/BCPP): a cluster-randomised trial.博茨瓦纳基于社区的干预措施后艾滋病毒检测、治疗、病毒抑制和男性割礼的人群参与情况(Ya Tsie/BCPP):一项集群随机试验。
Lancet HIV. 2020 Jun;7(6):e422-e433. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30103-X.
8
Impact of financial incentives on viral suppression among adults initiating HIV treatment in Tanzania: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.坦桑尼亚启动艾滋病毒治疗的成年人中财务激励对病毒抑制的影响:一项混合有效性实施试验。
Lancet HIV. 2024 Sep;11(9):e586-e597. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00149-8. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Community-based antiretroviral therapy versus standard clinic-based services for HIV in South Africa and Uganda (DO ART): a randomised trial.南非和乌干达的基于社区的抗逆转录病毒治疗与基于诊所的标准服务治疗艾滋病毒(DO ART):一项随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1305-e1315. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30313-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of implementation science theoretical approaches in hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 randomised trials of healthcare interventions: A scoping review.实施科学理论方法在医疗保健干预措施的混合效果-实施类型1随机试验中的应用:一项范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2025 May 16;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01435-6.
2
A Web-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Intervention (Thrive With Me) in a Community-Recruited Sample of Sexual Minority Men Living With HIV: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.基于网络的抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性干预(与我一起茁壮成长)在社区招募的 HIV 阳性性少数男性人群中的应用:一项随机对照研究的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e53819. doi: 10.2196/53819.
3
Implementation of Low-Barrier Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care: Lessons Learned From the Max Clinic in Seattle.
实施低门槛人类免疫缺陷病毒护理:西雅图马克斯诊所的经验教训。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 26;77(2):252-257. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad202.
4
A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Examination of Positive Health Check: Implementation Results From a Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Trial.纵向混合方法研究积极健康检查:1 型有效性-实施混合试验的实施结果。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Sep 1;91(1):47-57. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003018. Epub 2022 May 18.