• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深入探讨 PTSD 患者 DSM-5 精神共病的潜在类别:临床指标和治疗利用。

An in-depth look at latent classes of DSM-5 psychiatric comorbidity among individuals with PTSD: Clinical indicators and treatment utilization.

机构信息

National Center for PTSD, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2022 Nov;78(11):2214-2244. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23429. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.23429
PMID:35973077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9561047/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with high comorbidity rates across the full range of psychiatric disorders. However, little is known about how psychiatric comorbidity manifests among people with PTSD, particularly with regard to concurrent diagnoses.

METHOD

Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to characterize discrete classes of PTSD comorbidity using past year DSM-5 diagnostic standards among a large nationally representative epidemiologic sample of U.S. adults. Follow-up analyses compared participant characteristics across latent classes.

RESULTS

The LCA was best characterized by five classes: low comorbidity, distress-fear, distress-externalizing, mania-fear-externalizing, and mania-externalizing. Excluding the low comorbidity class, proportions of borderline and schizotypal personality disorder were high across classes.

CONCLUSION

Participant characteristics across classes of past year PTSD comorbidity are explored through the lens of case conceptualization and treatment planning utility.

摘要

目的

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与各种精神障碍的高共病率有关。然而,对于 PTSD 患者中精神共病的表现形式,特别是同时存在的诊断,人们知之甚少。

方法

使用潜伏类分析(LCA),根据美国成年人的大型全国代表性流行病学样本中过去一年的 DSM-5 诊断标准,对 PTSD 共病的离散类进行特征描述。后续分析比较了潜在类别中的参与者特征。

结果

LCA 最好用五类来描述:低共病、苦恼-恐惧、苦恼-外化、躁狂-恐惧-外化和躁狂-外化。不包括低共病类别,在各类别中,边缘型和分裂型人格障碍的比例都很高。

结论

通过案例概念化和治疗计划实用的角度探讨了过去一年 PTSD 共病各类别中参与者的特征。

相似文献

1
An in-depth look at latent classes of DSM-5 psychiatric comorbidity among individuals with PTSD: Clinical indicators and treatment utilization.深入探讨 PTSD 患者 DSM-5 精神共病的潜在类别:临床指标和治疗利用。
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Nov;78(11):2214-2244. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23429. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Identifying PTSD symptom typologies: A latent class analysis.识别 PTSD 症状类型:潜在类别分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Mar;285:112779. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112779. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
3
Latent class analysis of personality disorders in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.创伤后应激障碍成年患者人格障碍的潜在类别分析:来自国家酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查的结果
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;75(3):276-84. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08466.
4
Treatment receipt patterns among individuals with co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders.共病创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和物质使用障碍个体的治疗接受模式。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Nov;88(11):1039-1051. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000600. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Internalizing and externalizing subtypes in female patients with co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders.女性创伤后应激障碍共病物质使用障碍患者的内化和外化亚型。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Feb;121:108198. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108198. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Patterns of lifetime PTSD comorbidity: a latent class analysis.终生 PTSD 共病模式:潜类分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2013 May;30(5):489-96. doi: 10.1002/da.22048. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
7
Comorbidity of borderline personality disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in the U.S. population.美国人口中边缘型人格障碍与创伤后应激障碍的共病现象。
J Psychiatr Res. 2010 Dec;44(16):1190-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 May 26.
8
Psychiatric comorbidity of full and partial posttraumatic stress disorder among older adults in the United States: results from wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.美国老年人完全和部分创伤后应激障碍的精神共病:来自全国酒精相关情况的流行病学调查第 2 波的结果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 May;20(5):380-90. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31820d92e7.
9
Probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the US Veteran Population According to DSM-5: Results From the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.根据 DSM-5 标准,美国退伍军人人群中创伤后应激障碍的可能性:来自国家健康和退伍军人适应力研究的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;77(11):1503-1510. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10188.
10
Flexibly modeling age trends in the prevalence of co-occurring patterns of substance use and mental health disorders using time-varying effects and latent class analysis.使用时变效应和潜在类别分析灵活建模物质使用和心理健康障碍共病模式的流行率随年龄变化的趋势。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2022 May 4;48(3):293-301. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2021.2016786. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid psychiatric conditions on suicide reattempts.创伤后应激障碍及共病精神疾病对自杀再尝试的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2461435. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2461435. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Hospitalizations with post-traumatic stress disorder in France between 2013 and 2022: a nationwide retrospective study.2013年至2022年法国创伤后应激障碍住院情况:一项全国性回顾性研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 15;68(1):e10. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1810.

本文引用的文献

1
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.精神病理学的分层分类法(HiTOP):基于证据共识的定量分类学。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:83-108. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093304. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicidal Ideation, and Suicidal Self-Directed Violence Among U.S. Military Personnel and Veterans: A Systematic Review of the Literature From 2010 to 2018.美国军事人员和退伍军人中的创伤后应激障碍、自杀意念和自杀性自我导向暴力:2010年至2018年文献的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 26;11:1998. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01998. eCollection 2020.
3
Social Support Moderates the Association Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Duration and Treatment Outcomes in Telemedicine-Based Treatment Among Rural Veterans.社交支持调节了农村退伍军人远程医疗 PTSD 治疗时长与治疗结果之间的关系。
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Aug;33(4):391-400. doi: 10.1002/jts.22542. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
The effectiveness of interventions for reducing subjective and objective social isolation among people with mental health problems: a systematic review.干预措施在减少心理健康问题人群主观和客观社会隔离方面的有效性:系统评价。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;55(7):839-876. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01800-z. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
5
Association Between Adverse Childhood Events and Multimorbidity in a Racial and Ethnic Diverse Sample of Middle-Aged and Older Adults.种族和民族多样化的中老年人群样本中童年不良经历与多种疾病并存之间的关联
Innov Aging. 2019 Jun 29;3(2):igz016. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz016. eCollection 2019 May.
6
Differentiating symptom profiles of ICD-11 PTSD, complex PTSD, and borderline personality disorder: A latent class analysis in a multiply traumatized sample.鉴别 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍、复杂创伤后应激障碍和边缘型人格障碍的症状特征:在一个多次创伤样本中的潜在类别分析。
Personal Disord. 2020 Jan;11(1):36-45. doi: 10.1037/per0000346. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
A research programme to evaluate DBT-PTSD, a modular treatment approach for Complex PTSD after childhood abuse.一项评估DBT-PTSD的研究计划,这是一种针对童年期虐待后复杂性创伤后应激障碍的模块化治疗方法。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019 Mar 5;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s40479-019-0099-y. eCollection 2019.
8
A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research.精神病理学的层次分类学可以改变心理健康研究。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):419-436. doi: 10.1177/1745691618810696. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Typologies of PTSD clusters and reckless/self-destructive behaviors: A latent profile analysis.创伤后应激障碍集群和鲁莽/自毁行为的类型学:潜在剖面分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Feb;272:682-691. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.124. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
10
Clinical presentations, social functioning, and treatment receipt among individuals with comorbid life-time PTSD and alcohol use disorders versus drug use disorders: findings from NESARC-III.共病终身创伤后应激障碍和酒精使用障碍与药物使用障碍个体的临床表现、社会功能和治疗接受情况:来自 NESARC-III 的研究结果。
Addiction. 2019 Jun;114(6):983-993. doi: 10.1111/add.14565. Epub 2019 Mar 10.