Suppr超能文献

干预措施在减少心理健康问题人群主观和客观社会隔离方面的有效性:系统评价。

The effectiveness of interventions for reducing subjective and objective social isolation among people with mental health problems: a systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, England, UK.

UCL Medical School, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6BT, England, UK.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;55(7):839-876. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01800-z. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Subjective and objective social isolation are important factors contributing to both physical and mental health problems, including premature mortality and depression. This systematic review evaluated the current evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to improve subjective and/or objective social isolation for people with mental health problems. Primary outcomes of interest included loneliness, perceived social support, and objective social isolation.

METHODS

Three databases were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were included if they evaluated interventions for people with mental health problems and had objective and/or subjective social isolation (including loneliness) as their primary outcome, or as one of a number of outcomes with none identified as primary.

RESULTS

In total, 30 RCTs met the review's inclusion criteria: 15 included subjective social isolation as an outcome and 11 included objective social isolation. The remaining four evaluated both outcomes. There was considerable variability between trials in types of intervention and participants' characteristics. Significant results were reported in a minority of trials, but methodological limitations, such as small sample size, restricted conclusions from many studies.

CONCLUSION

The evidence is not yet strong enough to make specific recommendations for practice. Preliminary evidence suggests that promising interventions may include cognitive modification for subjective social isolation, and interventions with mixed strategies and supported socialisation for objective social isolation. We highlight the need for more thorough, theory-driven intervention development and for well-designed and adequately powered RCTs.

摘要

目的

主观和客观社会孤立是导致身心健康问题的重要因素,包括过早死亡和抑郁。本系统评价评估了改善有心理健康问题的人主观和/或客观社会孤立的干预措施的有效性。主要结果包括孤独感、感知社会支持和客观社会孤立。

方法

在三个数据库中搜索了相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。如果研究评估了针对有心理健康问题的人的干预措施,并且将主观和/或客观社会孤立(包括孤独感)作为主要结果之一,或者作为许多结果之一,而没有一个被确定为主要结果,则将其纳入研究范围。

结果

共有 30 项 RCT 符合本研究的纳入标准:15 项研究将主观社会孤立作为结果之一,11 项研究将客观社会孤立作为结果之一。其余四项评估了这两个结果。试验中干预措施的类型和参与者的特征存在很大差异。少数试验报告了显著结果,但由于样本量小、研究限制等方法学局限性,许多研究的结论仍然有限。

结论

目前的证据还不够强,无法为实践提供具体建议。初步证据表明,有前途的干预措施可能包括针对主观社会孤立的认知修正,以及针对客观社会孤立的混合策略和支持性社交干预措施。我们强调需要更彻底、基于理论的干预措施开发,以及精心设计和充分有力的 RCT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed03/7303071/676d04bac23a/127_2019_1800_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验