School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Human Brain Health (CHBH), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2022 Nov 15;262:119560. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119560. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
The study by Valentini et al. (2022) observed that the peak alpha frequency (PAF) of participants became slower after they were exposed to painful, as well as non-painful but unpleasant stimuli. The authors interpreted this as a challenge to our previous studies which propose that the speed of resting PAF, independently of pain-induced changes to PAF, can be a reliable biomarker marker for gaging individual pain sensitivity. While investigations into the role that PAF plays in pain perception are timely, we have some concerns about the assumptions and methodology employed by Valentini et al. Moreover, we believe the authors here have also misrepresented some of our previous work. In the current commentary, we detail the critical differences between our respective studies, with the ultimate aim of guiding future investigations.
瓦伦蒂尼等人(2022 年)的研究观察到,参与者在接触到痛苦以及非痛苦但不愉快的刺激后,其峰值 alpha 频率(PAF)变得更慢。作者将这一结果解释为对我们之前研究的挑战,我们之前提出,休息时 PAF 的速度,独立于 PAF 因疼痛而发生的变化,可以作为衡量个体疼痛敏感性的可靠生物标志物。虽然对 PAF 在疼痛感知中所起作用的研究很及时,但我们对瓦伦蒂尼等人使用的假设和方法有些担忧。此外,我们认为作者还错误地代表了我们之前的一些工作。在本评论中,我们详细说明了我们各自研究之间的关键差异,最终目的是指导未来的研究。