• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种将外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少作为感染住院后死亡新危险因素的预测模型。

A Prediction Model Incorporating Peripheral Eosinopenia as a Novel Risk Factor for Death After Hospitalization for Infection.

作者信息

Wang Ying, Salmasian Hojjat, Schluger Aaron, Gomez-Simmonds Angela, Choy Alexa, Li Jianhua, Axelrad Jordan E, Freedberg Daniel E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Gastro Hep Adv. 2022;1(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.10.002. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.gastha.2021.10.002
PMID:35974881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9377641/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

infection (CDI) is associated with a range of outcomes, and existing prediction models for death among patients with CDI are imprecise. Peripheral eosinopenia has been proposed as a novel risk factor for death among patients with CDI but has not been incorporated into prediction models. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for death among patients hospitalized with CDI that incorporated peripheral eosinopenia.

METHODS

Eosinopenia was defined as 0 eosinophils/L on the soonest peripheral blood drawn within the 48-hour window of the CDI test (before or after). Adults were eligible for the study if they were hospitalized at any one of 3 large, unaffiliated hospital networks, tested positive for CDI by stool polymerase chain reaction, and received appropriate anti-CDI treatment. Patients were followed for all-cause death for up to 30 days.

RESULTS

There were 4518 unique hospitalized adults with CDI included (2142 in the derivation cohort and 2376 in the validation cohort). All-cause 30-day mortality was 9% and 10% in the cohorts. In the validation cohort, the factors most strongly associated with death were eosinopenia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-3.50), albumin <3 g/dL (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 2.13-3.49), and creatinine >1.5 mg/dL (aOR 2.55, 95% CI 1.86-3.49). A 6-variable clinical prediction model was developed that improved on existing classification schemes for CDI severity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 vs 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Among adults hospitalized with CDI, peripheral eosinopenia was associated with increased risk of all-cause 30-day mortality. A prediction model incorporating peripheral eosinopenia was developed to improve care for hospitalized patients with CDI through risk stratification.

摘要

背景与目的

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)与一系列结局相关,现有的CDI患者死亡预测模型并不精确。外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少已被提出作为CDI患者死亡的一个新危险因素,但尚未纳入预测模型。本研究旨在开发并验证一个纳入外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少因素的CDI住院患者死亡预测模型。

方法

嗜酸性粒细胞减少定义为在CDI检测(之前或之后)的48小时窗口期内最早采集的外周血中嗜酸性粒细胞计数为0/μL。如果成年人在3个大型非关联医院网络中的任何一家住院,粪便聚合酶链反应检测CDI呈阳性,并接受了适当的抗CDI治疗,则符合本研究条件。对患者进行长达30天的全因死亡随访。

结果

共纳入4518例CDI住院成年患者(推导队列2142例,验证队列2376例)。队列中的全因30天死亡率分别为9%和10%。在验证队列中,与死亡最密切相关的因素是嗜酸性粒细胞减少(校正比值比[aOR]2.49,95%置信区间[CI]1.77 - 3.50)、白蛋白<3 g/dL(aOR 3.26,95% CI 2.13 - 3.49)和肌酐>1.5 mg/dL(aOR 2.55,95% CI 1.86 - 3.49)。开发了一个6变量临床预测模型,该模型在现有的CDI严重程度分类方案上有所改进(受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.75,而之前为0.68)。

结论

在CDI住院成年患者中,外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少与全因30天死亡率增加相关。开发了一个纳入外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少因素的预测模型,以通过风险分层改善CDI住院患者的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/420c/11307718/d0bd338d1b91/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/420c/11307718/5151ad8498da/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/420c/11307718/d0bd338d1b91/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/420c/11307718/5151ad8498da/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/420c/11307718/d0bd338d1b91/figs1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Prediction Model Incorporating Peripheral Eosinopenia as a Novel Risk Factor for Death After Hospitalization for Infection.一种将外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少作为感染住院后死亡新危险因素的预测模型。
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022;1(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.10.002. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
2
Eosinopenia and Binary Toxin Increase Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Infection.嗜酸性粒细胞减少和二元毒素增加住院感染患者的死亡率。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 4;7(1):ofz552. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz552. eCollection 2020 Jan.
3
Systemic Inflammatory Mediators Are Effective Biomarkers for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection.系统炎症介质是预测艰难梭菌感染不良结局的有效生物标志物。
mBio. 2020 May 5;11(3):e00180-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00180-20.
4
Does Addition of Intravenous Metronidazole to Oral Vancomycin Improve Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection?静脉注射甲硝唑是否能改善艰难梭菌感染的疗效?
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):2414-2420. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1115.
5
Outcomes of Patients Who Developed Clostridioides difficile Infection During Hospitalization and Had a History of Comorbid Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.住院期间发生艰难梭菌感染且有创伤后应激障碍合并症病史患者的结局
Cureus. 2022 Sep 5;14(9):e28810. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28810. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Class-Specific Relationship Between Use of Immunosuppressants and Risk for Community-Acquired Clostridioides difficile Infection.免疫抑制剂的使用与社区获得性艰难梭菌感染风险的特定类别关系。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 9;74(5):793-801. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab567.
7
Risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection in hospitalized patients and associated mortality in Japan: a multi-centre prospective cohort study.日本住院患者艰难梭菌感染的危险因素及相关死亡率:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Mar;104(3):350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
8
Obesity is not associated with adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients with Clostridioides difficile infection.肥胖与艰难梭菌感染住院患者的不良结局无关。
Gut Pathog. 2022 Jan 29;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13099-022-00479-z.
9
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Mortality and Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Peripheral Eosinopenia on Admission for Clostridium difficile Infection.开发和验证入院时外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少的艰难梭菌感染患者死亡率和不良结局预测模型。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1127-1133. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3174.
10
Risk of rehospitalization due to infection among hospitalized patients with : a cohort study.住院患者因感染再次住院的风险:一项队列研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 10;45(11):1-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.155.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency department eosinophil counts and mortality in Clostridium difficile: a multihospital retrospective cohort study.艰难梭菌感染患者急诊科嗜酸性粒细胞计数与死亡率:一项多医院回顾性队列研究
Porto Biomed J. 2025 May 6;10(3):e292. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000292. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing prediction models for clinical use using logistic regression: an overview.使用逻辑回归开发临床应用的预测模型:综述
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(Suppl 4):S574-S584. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.25.
2
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Mortality and Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Peripheral Eosinopenia on Admission for Clostridium difficile Infection.开发和验证入院时外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少的艰难梭菌感染患者死亡率和不良结局预测模型。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1127-1133. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3174.
3
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).
临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
4
A Surgical Clostridium-Associated Risk of Death Score Predicts Mortality After Colectomy for Clostridium difficile.手术相关的艰难梭菌死亡风险评分可预测艰难梭菌感染患者结肠切除术后的死亡率。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Dec;60(12):1285-1290. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000920.
5
Burden of Clostridium difficile-associated disease among patients residing in nursing homes: a population-based cohort study.养老院患者中艰难梭菌相关疾病的负担:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0367-2.
6
The binary toxin CDT enhances Clostridium difficile virulence by suppressing protective colonic eosinophilia.二元毒素 CDT 通过抑制保护性结肠嗜酸性粒细胞来增强艰难梭菌的毒力。
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Jul 11;1(8):16108. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.108.
7
Varying Estimates of Sepsis Mortality Using Death Certificates and Administrative Codes--United States, 1999-2014.使用死亡证明和行政代码估算的不同的败血症死亡率——美国,1999-2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Apr 8;65(13):342-5. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6513a2.
8
Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.分子检测时代艰难梭菌感染的过度诊断
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.
9
Principles and Pitfalls: a Guide to Death Certification.原则与陷阱:死亡证明指南
Clin Med Res. 2015 Jun;13(2):74-82; quiz 83-4. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2015.1276.
10
Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1539-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1403772.