Sugden Robert
School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Int Rev Econ. 2022;69(3):323-338. doi: 10.1007/s12232-022-00402-7. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
In , Sandel recasts the discontent expressed in populism as a rejection of market morality and as an inarticulate plea for the restoration of civic virtue. He argues that a 'market-based globalisation project' has fostered meritocratic ideas which humiliate the victims of that project and undermine the dignity of labour. I question Sandel's claim that meritocracy is a market value and the dignity of labour is not. I argue that his account of a moral alternative to normal market institutions-an economy in which individuals' rewards are somehow aligned with their true merits-is deeply incoherent.
在[具体内容缺失]中,桑德尔将民粹主义所表达的不满重新诠释为对市场道德的拒斥,以及对恢复公民美德的一种难以言表的诉求。他认为,“基于市场的全球化项目”催生了精英主义观念,这些观念羞辱了该项目的受害者,并损害了劳动尊严。我质疑桑德尔的观点,即精英主义是一种市场价值,而劳动尊严不是。我认为,他对正常市场制度的道德替代方案——一种个人回报以某种方式与其真正功绩相匹配的经济——的描述存在严重的内在矛盾。