• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 型糖尿病青少年最佳视网膜病变筛查频率:基于 30 年数据的马尔可夫模型方法。

Optimal Frequency of Retinopathy Screening in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Markov Modeling Approach Based on 30 Years of Data.

机构信息

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2383-2390. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0071.

DOI:10.2337/dc22-0071
PMID:35975939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9643143/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines recommend biennial diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening commencing at the age of 11 years and after 2-5 years' duration of type 1 diabetes. Growing evidence suggests less frequent screening may be feasible.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective data were collected from 2,063 youth with type 1 diabetes who were screened two or more times between 1990 and 2019. Baseline (mean ± SD) age was 13.3 ± 1.8 years, HbA1c was 8.6 ± 1.3% (70.1 ± 14.7 mmol/mol), diabetes duration was 5.6 ± 2.8 years, and follow-up time was 4.8 ± 2.8 years. DR was manually graded from 7-field retinal photographs using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale. Markov chain was used to calculate probabilities of DR change over time and hazard ratio (HR) of DR stage transition.

RESULTS

The incidence of moderate nonproliferative DR (MNPDR) or worse was 8.6 per 1,000 patient-years. Probabilities of transition to this state after a 3-year interval were from no DR, 1.3%; from minimal DR, 5.1%; and from mild DR, 22.2%, respectively. HRs (95% CIs) for transition per 1% current HbA1c increase were 1.23 (1.16-1.31) from no DR to minimal NPDR, 1.12 (1.03-1.23) from minimal to mild NPDR, and 1.28 (1.13-1.46) from mild to MNPDR or worse. HbA1c alone explained 27% of the transitions between no retinopathy and MNPDR or worse. The addition of diabetes duration into the model increased this value to 31% (P = 0.03). Risk was also increased by female sex and higher attained age.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support less frequent DR screening in youth with type 1 diabetes without DR and short duration. Although DR progression to advanced stages is generally slow, higher HbA1c greatly accelerates it.

摘要

目的

目前的指南建议,11 岁起且 1 型糖尿病病程达 2-5 年后,每两年进行一次糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查。越来越多的证据表明,更频繁的筛查可能并不必要。

研究设计和方法

本前瞻性研究收集了 1990 年至 2019 年间接受了两次或两次以上筛查的 2063 名 1 型糖尿病青少年的数据。基线时(均值±标准差)年龄为 13.3±1.8 岁,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为 8.6±1.3%(70.1±14.7mmol/mol),糖尿病病程为 5.6±2.8 年,随访时间为 4.8±2.8 年。采用 7 视野视网膜照片,应用早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)分级标准对 DR 进行手动分级。采用马尔可夫链计算 DR 随时间变化的概率和 DR 分期转换的危险比(HR)。

结果

中度非增殖性 DR(MNPDR)或更严重病变的发生率为 8.6/1000 患者年。3 年后进展到这一状态的概率分别为:无 DR 为 1.3%;轻度 DR 为 5.1%;以及中度 DR 为 22.2%。当前 HbA1c 每增加 1%,向各状态转变的 HR(95%CI)分别为:从不伴有 NPDR 转变为轻度 NPDR 为 1.23(1.16-1.31);从不伴有 NPDR 转变为中度 NPDR 为 1.12(1.03-1.23);从不伴有 NPDR 转变为 MNPDR 或更严重病变为 1.28(1.13-1.46)。HbA1c 单独解释了无 DR 与 MNPDR 或更严重病变之间 27%的转变。将糖尿病病程纳入模型后,这一比例增加到 31%(P=0.03)。女性和较高的实际年龄也增加了风险。

结论

这些结果支持在无 DR 且糖尿病病程较短的 1 型糖尿病青少年中减少 DR 筛查的频率。尽管 DR 向晚期进展通常较为缓慢,但 HbA1c 升高会极大加速这一进程。

相似文献

1
Optimal Frequency of Retinopathy Screening in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Markov Modeling Approach Based on 30 Years of Data.1 型糖尿病青少年最佳视网膜病变筛查频率:基于 30 年数据的马尔可夫模型方法。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2383-2390. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0071.
2
Retinal Vessel Geometry and the Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy.视网膜血管几何形态与糖尿病视网膜病变的发病率及进展
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 May 1;58(6):BIO200-BIO205. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21699.
3
Incidence and Risk Factors for Developing Diabetic Retinopathy among Youths with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes throughout the United States.美国1型或2型糖尿病青少年发生糖尿病视网膜病变的发病率及危险因素
Ophthalmology. 2017 Apr;124(4):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
4
First Incidence and Progression Study for Diabetic Retinopathy in Portugal, the RETINODIAB Study: Evaluation of the Screening Program for Lisbon Region.葡萄牙糖尿病视网膜病变的首次发病和进展研究,RETNODIAB 研究:里斯本地区筛查计划的评估。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec;122(12):2473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
Cost-effectiveness of biennial screening for diabetes related retinopathy in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared to annual screening.1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者中,与每年筛查相比,每两年筛查糖尿病相关视网膜病变的成本效益。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):993-1002. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01191-y. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
A decade-long telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy in the north-east of Italy.意大利东北部长达十年的糖尿病视网膜病变远程医疗筛查项目。
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Aug;31(8):1348-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Retinopathy prevalence, incidence and trajectories in type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle diabetes study phase II.2 型糖尿病患者的视网膜病变患病率、发生率和发展轨迹:弗里曼特尔糖尿病研究第二阶段。
Diabet Med. 2023 Apr;40(4):e15032. doi: 10.1111/dme.15032. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
8
The Importance of Close Follow-Up in Patients with Early-Grade Diabetic Retinopathy: A Taiwan Population-Based Study Grading via Deep Learning Model.早期糖尿病视网膜病变患者密切随诊的重要性:基于深度学习模型分级的台湾人群研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 16;18(18):9768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189768.
9
[Diabetes self-management and its association with diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes].[2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病自我管理及其与糖尿病视网膜病变的关联]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;49(6):500-6.
10
Risk factors associated with retinopathy in young people with type 1 diabetes in Bangladesh.孟加拉国青少年 1 型糖尿病视网膜病变的相关危险因素。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020 Dec 17;4(2):e00197. doi: 10.1002/edm2.197. eCollection 2021 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical Significance and Implications of Developing Diabetic Retinopathy During the 5 Years Following the Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病诊断后5年内发生糖尿病视网膜病变的临床意义及影响
Diabetes Care. 2023 Apr 1;46(4):678-679. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0062.

本文引用的文献

1
Thirty-Year Time Trends in Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Edema in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.30 年来青少年 1 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变和黄斑水肿的时间趋势。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2247-2254. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1652.
2
14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.14. 儿童和青少年:2022 年糖尿病医学护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S208-S231. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S014.
3
Sight-threatening retinopathy in nine adolescents with early onset type 1 diabetes.九名青少年起病 1 型糖尿病患者的视力威胁性视网膜病变。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Dec;22(8):1129-1134. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13265. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
13. Children and Adolescents: .儿童和青少年: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S180-S199. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S013.
5
Safety and cost-effectiveness of individualised screening for diabetic retinopathy: the ISDR open-label, equivalence RCT.个体化糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的安全性和成本效益:ISDR 开放性标签、等效 RCT。
Diabetologia. 2021 Jan;64(1):56-69. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05313-2. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
Trends in diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and associations with vision impairment attributable to diabetes in a large nationwide cohort.全国范围内大型队列研究中糖尿病视网膜病变筛查就诊率的变化趋势及其与糖尿病导致的视力损害的相关性。
Diabet Med. 2021 Apr;38(4):e14425. doi: 10.1111/dme.14425. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
7
Screening eye exams in youth with type 1 diabetes under 18 years of age: Once may be enough?18 岁以下 1 型糖尿病青少年的眼部筛查检查:一次检查是否足够?
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Sep;20(6):743-749. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12877. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Update on Screening for Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.筛查威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变进展。
Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62(4):218-224. doi: 10.1159/000499539. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Validation of a model for the prediction of retinopathy in persons with type 1 diabetes.验证一种预测 1 型糖尿病患者视网膜病变的模型。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;105(9):1286-1288. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313539. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Personalized risk-based screening for diabetic retinopathy: A multivariate approach versus the use of stratification rules.基于个体风险的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查:多变量方法与分层规则的应用比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):560-568. doi: 10.1111/dom.13552. Epub 2018 Oct 30.