• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

默克尔细胞癌在线患者教育资料的可读性

Readability of online patient education materials for Merkel cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Zhang Yue, Nguyen Catherine C, Bilimoria Karl Y, Merkow Ryan P

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, NMH/Galter 21St Floor, 675 N Saint Clair, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Loyola University, Chicago, IL, 60660, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Apr;315(3):629-632. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02381-9. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00403-022-02381-9
PMID:35976406
Abstract

The Internet is a significant source of information for patients. According to the National Institutes of Health, patient education materials (PEMs) should be at or below an eighth-grade reading level. Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer that affects patients over 50 with rising incidence. Unfortunately, US adults aged 65 + have the least proficiency in health literacy. This study assessed the readability of online PEMs and factors that contribute to readability. We retrieved 50 PEM websites and extracted primary content. A readability software package calculated six readability statistics and generated a consensus standard readability. Overall, only eight articles had a standard reading level of eighth-grade level or below (16%). The median standard reading level was at the 11th-grade level. We also examined MCC PEMs from cancer treatment institution websites (N = 20). We determined whether they contained institution-specific information, meaning they contained text information about the institution-specific expertise and specialist team. Websites containing this information (N = 13) had a significantly higher reading level than websites that did not (N = 7) in five of six readability metrics (p < 0.05). We concluded that MCC PEMs with institution-specific information led to significantly higher reading level scores. We propose that such information may increase cognitive load, as patients are learning about their disease and treatment and contending with the institution-specific information. The Cognitive Load Theory principles of intrinsic load (learning the material relevant to the disease and treatment) and extraneous load (institution-specific information and increased reading level) are constrained by limited working memory. Working memory decreases with age; hence, the patient demographic most sensitive to increased extraneous load tends to overlap with that of MCC. As patients typically read pages linked from their search engine, we suggest moving institution-specific information to another page, separate from the PEMs.

摘要

互联网是患者获取信息的重要来源。根据美国国立卫生研究院的说法,患者教育材料(PEMs)的阅读水平应在八年级及以下。默克尔细胞癌(MCC)是一种罕见且侵袭性强的皮肤癌,主要影响50岁以上的人群,其发病率呈上升趋势。不幸的是,65岁及以上的美国成年人健康素养水平最低。本研究评估了在线PEMs的可读性以及影响可读性的因素。我们检索了50个PEM网站并提取了主要内容。一个可读性软件包计算了六种可读性统计数据,并生成了一个共识标准可读性。总体而言,只有八篇文章的标准阅读水平在八年级及以下(16%)。标准阅读水平的中位数为十一年级。我们还检查了癌症治疗机构网站上的MCC PEMs(N = 20)。我们确定它们是否包含机构特定信息,即它们是否包含有关机构特定专业知识和专家团队的文本信息。在六个可读性指标中的五个指标上,包含此类信息的网站(N = 13)的阅读水平显著高于不包含此类信息的网站(N = 7)(p < 0.05)。我们得出结论,包含机构特定信息的MCC PEMs导致阅读水平得分显著更高。我们提出,此类信息可能会增加认知负荷,因为患者在了解自己的疾病和治疗情况时还要处理机构特定信息。内在负荷(学习与疾病和治疗相关的材料)和外在负荷(机构特定信息和阅读水平提高)的认知负荷理论原则受到有限工作记忆的限制。工作记忆会随着年龄增长而下降;因此,对增加的外在负荷最敏感的患者群体往往与MCC患者群体重叠。由于患者通常阅读从搜索引擎链接的页面,我们建议将机构特定信息移到与PEMs分开的另一页面。

相似文献

1
Readability of online patient education materials for Merkel cell carcinoma.默克尔细胞癌在线患者教育资料的可读性
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Apr;315(3):629-632. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02381-9. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.主要政府、非营利组织和制药机构的在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):616-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations.评估主要老年病学协会在线患者教育材料的可读性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1051-1056. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16960. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.针对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计的在线患者教育材料评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x.
5
Is the Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Material Improving?: An Assessment of Subspecialty Websites.与脊柱相关的患者教育材料的可读性是否在提高?:对亚专业网站的评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jun;41(12):1041-1048. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001446.
6
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
7
Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review.小儿矫形骨科在线患者教育材料的可读性:系统评价。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2023 Aug 1;43(7):e591-e599. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002402. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Traditional Measures: Comparative Analysis and Limitations.使用传统方法评估妇产科在线患者教育材料的可读性:比较分析与局限性。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 30;25:e46346. doi: 10.2196/46346.
9
A standardised method for improving patient education material readability for orthopaedic trauma patients.一种用于提高骨科创伤患者患者教育材料可读性的标准化方法。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Mar;22(1):e1869. doi: 10.1002/msc.1869.
10
Readability, Content, and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials on Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity in the Pediatric Population.在线麻醉和神经毒性儿科患者教育材料的可读性、内容和质量。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e341-e347. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1754408. Epub 2022 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Readability of Online Blood Cancer Education Materials Across Different Readability Measures.通过不同可读性评估方法评估在线血癌教育材料的可读性
Cureus. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):e58488. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58488. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Merkel cell carcinoma incidence, trends, and survival rates among adults aged ≥50 years from United States Cancer Statistics.美国癌症统计数据中50岁及以上成年人的默克尔细胞癌发病率、趋势和生存率。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Apr;80(4):1154-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.10.045.
2
Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.提高在线足踝患者教育材料的可读性。
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Dec;35(12):1282-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100714550650. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
3
Cognitive Load Theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86.
认知负荷理论:对医学教育的启示:AMEE指南第86号
Med Teach. 2014 May;36(5):371-84. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
4
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.低健康素养与健康结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.