• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于提高骨科创伤患者患者教育材料可读性的标准化方法。

A standardised method for improving patient education material readability for orthopaedic trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Mar;22(1):e1869. doi: 10.1002/msc.1869.

DOI:10.1002/msc.1869
PMID:38367003
Abstract

PURPOSE

While the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommend patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at the sixth-grade reading level or below, many patient education materials related to traumatic orthopaedic injuries do not meet these recommendations. The purpose of this study is to create a standardised method for enhancing the readability of trauma-related orthopaedic PEMs by reducing the use of ≥ three syllable words and reducing the use of sentences >15 words in length. We hypothesise that applying this standardized method will significantly improve the objective readability of orthopaedic trauma PEMs.

METHODS

A patient education website was queried for PEMs relevant to traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Orthopaedic trauma PEMs included (N = 40) were unique, written in a prose format, and <3500 words. PEM statistics, including scores for seven independent readability formulae, were determined for each PEM before and after applying this standard method.

RESULTS

All PEMs had significantly different readability scores when comparing original and edited PEMs (p < 0.01). The mean Flesch Kincaid Grade Level of the original PEMs (10.0 ± 1.0) was significantly higher than that of edited PEMs (5.8 ± 1.1) (p < 0.01). None of the original PEMs met recommendations of a sixth-grade reading level compared with 31 (77.5%) of edited PEMs.

CONCLUSIONS

This standard method that reduces the use of ≥ three syllable words and <15 word sentences has been shown to significantly reduce the reading-grade level of PEMs for traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Improving the readability of PEMs may lead to enhanced health literacy and improved health outcomes.

摘要

目的

尽管美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会建议患者教育材料(PEM)的写作水平应低于或等于六年级阅读水平,但许多与创伤骨科损伤相关的患者教育材料不符合这些建议。本研究的目的是通过减少使用≥三个音节的单词和减少使用长度超过 15 个单词的句子,为创伤相关骨科 PEM 创建一种标准化的方法来提高可读性。我们假设应用这种标准化方法将显著提高骨科创伤 PEM 的客观可读性。

方法

查询患者教育网站,获取与创伤性骨科损伤相关的 PEM。纳入的骨科创伤 PEM(N=40)是独特的,以散文格式书写,且篇幅<3500 字。在应用这种标准方法之前和之后,确定每个 PEM 的 PEM 统计数据,包括七种独立的可读性公式的得分。

结果

所有 PEM 的可读性评分在比较原始和编辑后的 PEM 时均有显著差异(p<0.01)。原始 PEM 的 Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平平均值(10.0±1.0)明显高于编辑后的 PEM(5.8±1.1)(p<0.01)。与 31 个(77.5%)编辑后的 PEM 相比,没有一个原始 PEM 符合六年级阅读水平的建议。

结论

这种减少使用≥三个音节单词和<15 个单词句子的标准方法已被证明可显著降低创伤性骨科损伤的 PEM 阅读水平。提高 PEM 的可读性可能会提高健康素养并改善健康结果。

相似文献

1
A standardised method for improving patient education material readability for orthopaedic trauma patients.一种用于提高骨科创伤患者患者教育材料可读性的标准化方法。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Mar;22(1):e1869. doi: 10.1002/msc.1869.
2
Readability of spine-related patient education materials: a standard method for improvement.脊柱相关患者教育材料的可读性:一种改进的标准方法。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep;32(9):3039-3046. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07856-5. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
3
Reducing the Use of Complex Words and Reducing Sentence Length to <15 Words Improves Readability of Patient Education Materials Regarding Sports Medicine Knee Injuries.减少复杂词汇的使用并将句子长度缩短至15个单词以内可提高有关运动医学膝关节损伤的患者教育材料的可读性。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec 29;5(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.10.004. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics.儿科骨科患者教育材料的可读性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jun 16;103(12):e47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01347.
5
Readability Analysis of Patient Education Material on Rotator Cuff Injuries From the Top 25 Ranking Orthopaedic Institutions.对前 25 名排名骨科机构的肩袖损伤患者教育材料进行可读性分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 May 9;8(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00085. eCollection 2024 May 1.
6
Is the Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Material Improving?: An Assessment of Subspecialty Websites.与脊柱相关的患者教育材料的可读性是否在提高?:对亚专业网站的评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jun;41(12):1041-1048. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001446.
7
Readability of Trauma-related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Trauma Association Websites.美国矫形外科医师学会和创伤骨科协会网站上创伤相关患者教育材料的可读性。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul 1;32(13):e642-e650. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00449. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
8
Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.基于互联网的内镜鼻窦手术相关患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1649-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.23309. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
A READABILITY COMPARISON OF ONLINE SPANISH AND ENGLISH PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS ABOUT VISION HEALTH.在线西班牙语和英语视力健康患者教育材料的可读性比较。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):182-188. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1910316. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review.小儿矫形骨科在线患者教育材料的可读性:系统评价。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2023 Aug 1;43(7):e591-e599. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002402. Epub 2023 Mar 30.