• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中的资源分配决策:生活质量评估能发挥作用吗?

Resource allocation decisions in health care: a role for quality of life assessments?

作者信息

Drummond M F

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):605-19. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90021-x.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90021-x
PMID:3597661
Abstract

This paper discusses the relevance of quality of life measurement in clinical and epidemiological research to resource allocation decisions in health care. The discussion concentrates on economic evaluations, the form of health services research which most directly pertains to decisions about the allocation of resources, and the use of the quality-adjusted life-year in economic evaluation. Three key issues are addressed: whose assessments of quality of life are relevant and how should these be obtained; should one search for a generalizable quality of life measure; is it right to construct "league tables" of health care interventions in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year?

摘要

本文探讨了生活质量测量在临床和流行病学研究中与卫生保健资源分配决策的相关性。讨论集中在经济评估、与资源分配决策最直接相关的卫生服务研究形式以及经济评估中质量调整生命年的使用。文中讨论了三个关键问题:哪些人的生活质量评估是相关的以及应如何获取这些评估;是否应该寻找一种可推广的生活质量测量方法;根据每质量调整生命年的成本构建卫生保健干预措施的“排行榜”是否正确?

相似文献

1
Resource allocation decisions in health care: a role for quality of life assessments?医疗保健中的资源分配决策:生活质量评估能发挥作用吗?
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):605-19. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90021-x.
2
Ethics and resource allocation: an economist's view.伦理与资源分配:一位经济学家的观点。
Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(11):1167-74. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90183-8.
3
Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers.质量调整生命年。对医生和政策制定者的伦理影响。
JAMA. 1990 Jun 6;263(21):2917-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.263.21.2917.
4
Allocating resources to health care: is the QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Year) a technical solution to a political problem?卫生保健资源分配:质量调整生命年(QALY)是政治问题的技术解决方案吗?
Int J Health Serv. 1991;21(2):351-63. doi: 10.2190/HPLM-EGXV-BWKY-5XBN.
5
Health care technology and the inevitability of resource allocation and rationing decisions. Part I.医疗保健技术以及资源分配与配给决策的必然性。第一部分。
JAMA. 1983 Apr 15;249(15):2047-53.
6
Should "standard gamble" and "'time trade off" utility measurement be used more in mental health research?“标准博弈”和“时间权衡”效用测量是否应在心理健康研究中得到更多应用?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):65-72.
7
Cost-effectiveness league tables: more harm than good?成本效益排行榜:弊大于利?
Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jul;37(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90315-u.
8
Health care technology and the inevitability of resource allocation and rationing decisions. Part II.医疗保健技术与资源分配及配给决策的必然性。第二部分。
JAMA. 1983;249(16):2208-19.
9
Moral values and ethical decisions in a constrained economic environment.受限经济环境中的道德价值观与伦理决策。
Nurs Econ. 1986 Jul-Aug;4(4):160-4.
10
The moral choice: allocation of scarce resources.道德抉择:稀缺资源的分配
Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Nov 17;121(10):1388, 1390, 1406.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical prioritization based on decision model outcomes is not sensitive to differences between the health-related quality of life values estimates of physicians and citizens.基于决策模型结果的手术优先级排序对医生和公民的健康相关生活质量价值评估之间的差异不敏感。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):529-539. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03544-5. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
2
The price of neonatal intensive care outcomes - in-hospital costs of morbidities related to preterm birth.新生儿重症监护结果的代价——与早产相关疾病的住院费用。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Feb 7;11:1068367. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1068367. eCollection 2023.
3
Reference data among general population and known-groups validity among hypertensive population of the EQ-5D-5L in Vietnam.
越南一般人群中的参考数据和高血压人群中 EQ-5D-5L 的已知群组有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Feb;31(2):539-550. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02959-2. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Vietnam.越南的 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1923-1933. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02469-7. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
5
Influence of Social Support on Health-Related Quality of Life in New-Generation Migrant Workers in Eastern China.社会支持对中国东部新生代农民工健康相关生活质量的影响。
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Aug;42(8):806-12.
6
Towards more consistent use of generic quality-of-life instruments.迈向更一致地使用通用生活质量量表。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(4):345-6. doi: 10.2165/11530980-000000000-00000.
7
Beyond standard quality of life measures: the subjective experiences of living with inflammatory bowel disease.超越标准生活质量衡量指标:炎症性肠病患者的主观体验
Qual Life Res. 2008 Aug;17(6):877-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9362-1. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
8
Economic analysis of randomized, controlled trials.随机对照试验的经济分析
Curr Oncol Rep. 2001 Sep;3(5):396-403. doi: 10.1007/s11912-001-0025-4.
9
Cost-per-QALY league tables: their role in pharmacoeconomic analysis.每质量调整生命年成本排行榜:其在药物经济学分析中的作用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Jun;5(6):472-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405060-00004.
10
Are quality of life, patient preferences, and costs realistic outcomes for clinical trials?生活质量、患者偏好和成本对于临床试验来说是现实的结果吗?
Support Care Cancer. 1997 Mar;5(2):112-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01262567.