• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浅析医疗急症环境下对精神疾病患者的偏见和监禁式反应造成的医源性伤害

How Biased and Carceral Responses to Persons With Mental Illness in Acute Medical Care Settings Constitute Iatrogenic Harms.

机构信息

Assistant professor of psychiatry at the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut.

Albert J. Solnit Integrated Adult/Child Psychiatry Clinical Fellow at the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2022 Aug 1;24(8):E781-787. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.781.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2022.781
PMID:35976936
Abstract

Recognizing their roles in iatrogenesis requires clinicians and professions to take responsibility for attitudes and policies that harm patients and waste resources. A striking, neglected set of examples of iatrogenic harm involves persons with severe mental illness (SMI) who seek inpatient medical care. This article describes how medicine, despite spending billions each year trying to respond to acute physical medical needs of persons with SMI, participates in carceral policies and practices that fail to prioritize continuity of care. This article also details clinicians' and professions' responsibilities to mitigate their roles in iatrogenic harm incursion by practicing antiracist, evidence-based, collaborative care to motivate equity, reduce waste, and improve outcomes, especially in crisis responses to patients experiencing acute exacerbations of SMI in inpatient medical care settings.

摘要

认识到他们在医源性疾病中的作用,需要临床医生和专业人员对伤害患者和浪费资源的态度和政策负责。一组引人注目的、被忽视的医源性伤害的例子涉及到寻求住院医疗的严重精神疾病(SMI)患者。本文描述了尽管医学每年花费数十亿美元试图应对 SMI 患者的急性身体医疗需求,但它如何参与到监禁政策和未能优先考虑护理连续性的实践中。本文还详细说明了临床医生和专业人员的责任,通过实践反种族主义、基于证据的、协作的护理,减轻他们在医源性伤害中的作用,以促进公平、减少浪费和改善结果,特别是在对住院医疗环境中经历 SMI 急性加重的患者的危机应对中。

相似文献

1
How Biased and Carceral Responses to Persons With Mental Illness in Acute Medical Care Settings Constitute Iatrogenic Harms.浅析医疗急症环境下对精神疾病患者的偏见和监禁式反应造成的医源性伤害
AMA J Ethics. 2022 Aug 1;24(8):E781-787. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.781.
2
Examining equity in the utilisation of psychiatric inpatient care among patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in Ontario, Canada.考察加拿大安大略省严重精神疾病(SMI)患者精神科住院治疗利用情况的公平性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 23;21(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03419-4.
3
When Experiencing Inequitable Health Care Is a Patient's Norm, How Should Iatrogenic Harm Be Considered?当患者经历不平等的医疗保健成为常态时,应该如何考虑医源性伤害?
AMA J Ethics. 2022 Aug 1;24(8):E729-734. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.729.
4
5
Promoting Antiracist Mental Health Crisis Responses.倡导反种族主义心理健康危机应对措施。
AMA J Ethics. 2022 Aug 1;24(8):E788-794. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.788.
6
Determinants of Boarding of Patients with Severe Mental Illness in Hospital Emergency Departments.医院急诊科严重精神疾病患者住院的决定因素
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2020 Jun 1;23(2):61-75.
7
Clinicians' Racial Biases as Pathways to Iatrogenic Harms for Black People.临床医生的种族偏见是导致黑人医源性伤害的途径。
AMA J Ethics. 2022 Aug 1;24(8):E768-772. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.768.
8
Pathways through care of severely mentally ill individuals experiencing multiple public crisis events: a qualitative description.经历多重公共危机事件的重症精神病患者的护理途径:定性描述
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;16:84. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0787-8.
9
Suicide and death by other causes among patients with a severe mental illness: cohort study comparing risks among patients discharged from inpatient care . those treated in the community.严重精神疾病患者的自杀和其他原因导致的死亡:比较住院和社区治疗患者风险的队列研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 May 6;31:e32. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000075.
10
"Somebody else's business": The challenge of caring for patients with mental health problems on medical and surgical wards.“他人的事务”:在内外科室照顾有心理健康问题的患者的挑战。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;27(4):406-416. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12596. Epub 2020 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Governance for anti-racist AI in healthcare: integrating racism-related stress in psychiatric algorithms for Black Americans.医疗保健领域反种族主义人工智能的治理:将与种族主义相关的压力纳入针对美国黑人的精神病学算法中。
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 15;7:1492736. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1492736. eCollection 2025.
2
How Do Weapons Screening Programs Reduce Armed Hospital Assault? A Scoping Review of Public Health Principles.武器筛查计划如何减少医院武装袭击?公共卫生原则的范围审查
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02337-5.
3
"See Me as Human:" Reflections on an Experiential Curriculum Led by People With Lived Experience of Incarceration.
“视我为人”:对由有监禁经历者主导的体验式课程的反思
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jan 17;12:23821205241300943. doi: 10.1177/23821205241300943. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Social-ecological barriers and facilitators to seeking inpatient psychiatric care among transgender and nonbinary people: A qualitative descriptive study.跨性别者和非二元性别者寻求住院精神科护理的社会生态障碍与促进因素:一项定性描述性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):1937-1952. doi: 10.1111/jan.16393. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
5
Words Matter: Stylistic Writing Strategies for Racial Health Equity in Academic Medicine.用词至关重要:学术医学中实现种族健康公平的文体写作策略。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Dec;9(6):2071-2076. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01424-1. Epub 2022 Oct 17.