Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 29;2(10):e213460. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3460. eCollection 2021 Oct.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospital systems were forced to reduce operating room capacity and reallocate resources. The outcomes of these policies on the care of injured patients and the maintenance of emergency services have not been adequately reported.
To evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with delays in urgent fracture surgery beyond national time-to-surgery benchmarks.
This retrospective cohort study used data collected in the Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Preoperative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma among at 20 sites throughout the US and Canada and included patients who sustained open fractures or closed femur or hip fractures.
COVID-19-era operating room restrictions were compared with pre-COVID-19 data.
Surgery within 24 hours after injury.
A total of 3589 patients (mean [SD] age, 55 [25.4] years; 1913 [53.3%] male) were included in this study, 2175 pre-COVID-19 and 1414 during COVID-19. A total of 54 patients (3.1%) in the open fracture cohort and 407 patients (21.8%) in the closed hip/femur fracture cohort did not meet 24-hour time-to-surgery benchmarks. We were unable to detect any association between time to operating room and COVID-19 era in either open fracture (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% CI, 0.77-2.55; = .28) or closed femur/hip fracture (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74-1.37; = .97) cohorts. In the closed femur/hip fracture cohort, there was no association between time to operating room and regional COVID-19 prevalence (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.70-1.64; = .76).
In this cohort study, there was no association between meeting time-to-surgery benchmarks in either open fracture or closed femur/hip fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic. This is counter to concerns that the unprecedented challenges associated with managing the COVID-19 pandemic would be associated with clinically significant delays in acute management of urgent surgical cases and suggests that many hospital systems within the US were able to effectively implement policies consistent with time-to-surgery standards for orthopedic trauma in the context of COVID-19-related resource constraints.
为应对 COVID-19 大流行,许多医院系统被迫减少手术室容量并重新分配资源。这些政策对受伤患者的护理和急诊服务的维持的影响尚未得到充分报告。
评估 COVID-19 大流行是否与超出国家手术时间基准的紧急骨折手术延迟有关。
本回顾性队列研究使用在美国和加拿大的 20 个地点收集的程序随机试验评估术前抗菌皮肤溶液在矫形创伤中的应用的数据,包括发生开放性骨折或闭合性股骨或髋部骨折的患者。
将 COVID-19 时代的手术室限制与 COVID-19 前数据进行比较。
受伤后 24 小时内进行手术。
本研究共纳入 3589 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,55 [25.4]岁;1913 [53.3%]为男性),其中 2175 名患者在 COVID-19 前,1414 名患者在 COVID-19 期间。开放性骨折队列中有 54 名(3.1%)患者和闭合性髋/股骨骨折队列中有 407 名(21.8%)患者未达到 24 小时手术时间基准。我们无法检测到手术时间与 COVID-19 时代之间的任何关联,无论是在开放性骨折(比值比[OR],1.40;95%CI,0.77-2.55; = 0.28)还是闭合性股骨/髋部骨折(OR,1.01;95%CI,0.74-1.37; = 0.97)队列中。在闭合性股骨/髋部骨折队列中,手术时间与区域 COVID-19 流行之间没有关联(OR,1.07;95%CI,0.70-1.64; = 0.76)。
在这项队列研究中,与大流行前相比,COVID-19 期间在开放性骨折或闭合性股骨/髋部骨折中达到手术时间基准没有关联。这与人们的担忧相反,即管理 COVID-19 大流行所带来的前所未有的挑战将与急性处理紧急手术病例的临床显著延迟相关,并表明美国许多医院系统能够在与 COVID-19 相关的资源限制的背景下有效实施符合骨科创伤手术时间标准的政策。