James Chrystina L, Wolterink Trevor D, Fathima Bushra, Burdick Gabriel B, Wager Susan G, Haan Jager W, Hegde Yash D, Muh Stephanie
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 13;15(8):e43433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43433. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Background and objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated a sudden and drastic shift in patient management throughout the healthcare system, to curb the spread of the disease and deal with resource limitations. Many surgical cases were canceled or delayed with only the most urgent and emergent cases taken up for treatment. It is unknown if and how these alterations affected patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare time to fracture care and outcomes between patients treated for humeral shaft fractures prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and those treated during the pandemic. We hypothesized that the pandemic cohort would have a prolonged time to fracture care and worse outcomes than the pre-pandemic cohort. Materials and methods This was a retrospective cohort study performed within a single healthcare system. All humeral shaft fractures treated from March to June 2019 (pre-pandemic cohort) and March to June 2020 (pandemic cohort) were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes and ICD-10-CM codes as well as Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Data on demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were collected via chart and radiograph review. Outcomes analyzed included time to being made weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT), radiographic union, and final follow-up; range of motion (ROM) at radiographic union and final follow-up; and rate of complications. Results The pre-pandemic cohort (n=19) was significantly younger with a mean age of 29 years than the pandemic cohort (n=17) with a mean age of 49 years (p=0.010). There were no other significant differences in demographics, fracture characteristics, or treatment type between the groups. Time to fracture care was not significantly different in the pre-pandemic cohort (five days) versus the pandemic cohort (four days). Time to being made WBAT, radiographic union, and final follow-up were not significantly different between the pre-pandemic (86, 113, and 98 days) and the pandemic cohorts (77, 106, and 89.5 days). ROM measurements in abduction at radiographic union were significantly different between the cohorts: in the pre-pandemic cohort, 100% of patients reached greater than 160 degrees; in the pandemic cohort, only 16.7% of patients reached greater than 160 degrees (p=0.048). There was a non-significant decrease in the proportion of patients who achieved the maximal category of ROM measurements in forward elevation and extension at radiographic union and abduction, forward elevation, and extension at final follow-up, as well as a non-significant increase in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at final follow-up between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the rate of complications. Conclusions Despite limited resources, reduced operating room availability, and increased utilization of virtual visits due to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with humeral shaft fractures may not have faced delays in fracture care or worse outcomes compared to the pre-pandemic period. The pandemic cohort may have experienced significantly decreased ROM compared to the pre-pandemic cohort, which may reflect the decreased availability of physical therapy services and overall decreased activity levels due to the quarantine orders. However, we could not identify any other significant differences in the type of treatment, pain, complications, or time to union.
背景与目的 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行使得整个医疗系统的患者管理方式突然发生了巨大转变,以遏制疾病传播并应对资源限制。许多外科手术病例被取消或推迟,仅处理最紧急的病例。目前尚不清楚这些改变是否以及如何影响患者的治疗结果。本研究的目的是比较 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间接受肱骨干骨折治疗的患者的骨折治疗时间和治疗结果。我们假设大流行期间的患者队列骨折治疗时间会延长,且治疗结果比大流行前的队列更差。材料与方法 这是一项在单一医疗系统内进行的回顾性队列研究。使用国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)编码、ICD-10-CM 编码以及现行手术操作术语(CPT)编码,确定 2019 年 3 月至 6 月(大流行前队列)和 2020 年 3 月至 6 月(大流行队列)期间治疗的所有肱骨干骨折病例。通过病历和 X 光片审查收集人口统计学、骨折特征、治疗方法及治疗结果等数据。分析的治疗结果包括达到可耐受负重(WBAT)的时间、影像学愈合及末次随访时间;影像学愈合及末次随访时的活动范围(ROM);以及并发症发生率。结果 大流行前队列(n = 19)的平均年龄为 29 岁,显著低于大流行队列(n = 17)的平均年龄 49 岁(p = 0.010)。两组在人口统计学、骨折特征或治疗类型方面无其他显著差异。大流行前队列的骨折治疗时间(5 天)与大流行队列(4 天)无显著差异。达到 WBAT 的时间、影像学愈合时间及末次随访时间在大流行前队列(分别为 86、113 和 98 天)与大流行队列(分别为 77、106 和 89.5 天)之间无显著差异。影像学愈合时外展 ROM 测量值在两组间存在显著差异:大流行前队列中,100%的患者外展角度大于 160 度;大流行队列中,只有 16.7%的患者外展角度大于 160 度(p = 0.048)。影像学愈合时前屈和伸展 ROM 测量达到最大等级的患者比例,以及末次随访时前屈、伸展和外展 ROM 测量达到最大等级的患者比例均有非显著性下降,且两组间末次随访时视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分有非显著性升高。并发症发生率无显著差异。结论 尽管由于 COVID-19 大流行导致资源有限、手术室可用时间减少以及虚拟问诊使用增加,但与大流行前时期相比,肱骨干骨折患者的骨折治疗可能并未延迟,治疗结果也未变差。与大流行前队列相比,大流行队列的 ROM 可能显著降低,这可能反映了物理治疗服务可及性降低以及由于隔离措施导致的总体活动水平下降。然而,我们未发现治疗类型、疼痛、并发症或愈合时间方面存在任何其他显著差异。