• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平价医疗法案通过前后医疗保险按服务收费的医疗保健支出的地域差异。

Geographic Variation in Medicare Fee-for-Service Health Care Expenditures Before and After the Passage of the Affordable Care Act.

机构信息

Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 10;2(12):e214122. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4122. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4122
PMID:35977300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8796890/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Geographic variation in Medicare spending is often used as a measure of wasteful spending. A 2013 Institute of Medicine report found that postacute care was a key contributor of geographic variation from 2007 to 2009. However, payment reforms and antifraud efforts implemented after the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may have reduced geographic variation in spending, especially postacute care spending.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how geographic variation in Medicare fee-for-service per-beneficiary spending changed from 2007 to 2018 before and after passage of the ACA.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study included all fee-for-service Medicare enrollees 65 years or older from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2018. The fee-for-service Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File was used to group hospital referral regions (HRRs) in each year into deciles (10 equal groups) based on per-beneficiary total spending. The difference between the per-beneficiary monthly spending in each decile and the national mean, as well as the ratio of per-beneficiary total spending in the top deciles to that of the bottom decile, were reported. Data analysis occurred from July 22, 2019, to October 21, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Per-beneficiary spending on hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician, and postacute care (and type of postacute care).

RESULTS

There were 27.2 million fee-for-service beneficiaries in 2007 (58.0% women) and 28.3 million beneficiaries in 2018 (55.9% women). Per-beneficiary Medicare spending was $9691 in 2007 and $9847 in 2018 (using inflation-adjusted 2018 dollars). Geographic variation in Medicare spending was stable from 2007 to 2011 and then declined steadily from 2012 to 2018. The ratio of per-beneficiary total Medicare spending in the HRRs in the top decile to the bottom decile was 1.68 in 2007 ($415 monthly difference in spending) but only 1.56 ($361 monthly difference in spending) in 2018 (estimated change, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.21 to -0.02];  = .01). Focusing on specific spending categories, the only statistically significant reductions in geographic variation were found for home health; the ratio of home health spending among HRRs in the top to bottom deciles of total Medicare spending fell from 5.14 in 2007 to 3.45 in 2018 (change, -1.69 [95% CI, -3.30 to -0.09]; = .04).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Geographic variation in total per-beneficiary Medicare spending fell from 2007 to 2018, with home health spending being a key factor associated with geographic variation. The ACA's value-based payment programs and enhanced integrity efforts in home health provide a possible explanation for the decrease.

摘要

重要性

医疗保险支出的地域差异通常被用作衡量浪费性支出的指标。2013 年医学研究所的一份报告发现,2007 年至 2009 年期间,后期护理是造成地域差异的一个关键因素。然而,平价医疗法案(ACA)通过后实施的支付改革和反欺诈措施可能已经降低了支出的地域差异,尤其是后期护理支出的地域差异。

目的

调查在 ACA 通过之前和之后,2007 年至 2018 年间医疗保险按受益人头付费的地域差异如何变化。

设计、设置和参与者:本横断面研究纳入了 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间所有 65 岁及以上的按人头付费的医疗保险受保人。使用按人头付费的医疗保险地域差异公共使用文件,将每个年度的医院转诊区域(HRR)按照受益人头总支出分为十分位数(10 个相等的组)。报告了每个十分位数的受益人头每月支出与全国平均值之间的差异,以及最高十分位数的受益人头总支出与最低十分位数的受益人头总支出的比值。数据分析于 2019 年 7 月 22 日至 2021 年 10 月 21 日进行。

主要结果和测量指标

医院住院、医院门诊、医生和后期护理(及后期护理类型)的受益人头支出。

结果

2007 年有 2720 万按人头付费的受益人和 2018 年有 2830 万受益人的(55.9%为女性)。2007 年的医疗保险受益人头支出为 9691 美元,2018 年为 9847 美元(使用通胀调整后的 2018 年美元)。2007 年至 2011 年,医疗保险支出的地域差异保持稳定,然后从 2012 年到 2018 年稳步下降。HRR 中最高十分位数和最低十分位数的受益人头总医疗保险支出的比值在 2007 年为 1.68(支出差异为每月 415 美元),而在 2018 年仅为 1.56(支出差异为每月 361 美元)(估计变化,-0.12 [95% CI,-0.21 至 -0.02];  = .01)。在关注特定支出类别时,仅发现家庭健康的地域差异有统计学意义的减少;HRR 中家庭健康支出最高十分位数与最低十分位数的比值从 2007 年的 5.14 降至 2018 年的 3.45(变化,-1.69 [95% CI,-3.30 至 -0.09];  = .04)。

结论和相关性

从 2007 年到 2018 年,医疗保险受益人头总支出的地域差异下降,家庭健康支出是与地域差异相关的一个关键因素。ACA 的基于价值的支付计划和家庭健康方面的强化诚信措施可能解释了这种下降。

相似文献

1
Geographic Variation in Medicare Fee-for-Service Health Care Expenditures Before and After the Passage of the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案通过前后医疗保险按服务收费的医疗保健支出的地域差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 10;2(12):e214122. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4122. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共同节约计划中急性后期护理的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):518-526. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115.
3
Trends in and Factors Contributing to the Slowdown in Medicare Spending Growth, 2007-2018.2007-2018 年医疗保险支出增长放缓的趋势及影响因素
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Dec 2;3(12):e224475. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4475.
4
Geographic Variation In Medicare Per Capita Spending Narrowed From 2007 To 2017.2007年至2017年,医疗保险人均支出的地区差异有所缩小。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1875-1882. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00188.
5
Mortality, Hospitalizations, and Expenditures for the Medicare Population Aged 65 Years or Older, 1999-2013.1999 - 2013年65岁及以上医疗保险人群的死亡率、住院率和费用支出
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):355-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8035.
6
Social Determinants of Health and Geographic Variation in Medicare per Beneficiary Spending.医疗保险受益人均支出的健康社会决定因素和地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113212. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13212.
7
Geographical Variation in Health Spending Across the US Among Privately Insured Individuals and Enrollees in Medicaid and Medicare.美国私人保险个人和医疗补助及医疗保险参保者的健康支出的地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222138. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22138.
8
Association Between Medicare Accountable Care Organization Implementation and Spending Among Clinically Vulnerable Beneficiaries.医疗保险责任制医疗组织实施与临床脆弱受益人群支出的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1167-75. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2827.
9
Evaluation of US Hospital Episode Spending for Acute Inpatient Conditions After the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后对美国急性住院患者病种的医院住院费用评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2023926. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23926.
10
Association Between a Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Patient Outcomes Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.下肢关节置换捆绑支付计划与医疗保险优势受益人的患者结局之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231495. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1495.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of an innovative case-based payment reform on hospital cost variation: insights from cerebral infarction inpatients in China.一项创新性病例付费改革对医院成本差异的影响:来自中国脑梗死住院患者的见解
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 19;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02447-w.
2
Regional variation in length of stay for stroke inpatient rehabilitation in traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划中中风住院康复患者住院时间的地区差异。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Jul 16;2(7):qxae089. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae089. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Spatiotemporal Patterns of Hospitalizations Among Older Adults With Co-Presence of Cancer and Dementia in US Counties: 2013-2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic Variation In Medicare Per Capita Spending Narrowed From 2007 To 2017.2007年至2017年,医疗保险人均支出的地区差异有所缩小。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1875-1882. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00188.
2
Home Health Use In Medicare Advantage Compared To Use In Traditional Medicare.与传统医疗保险相比,医疗保险优势计划中的家庭医疗使用情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):1072-1079. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01091.
3
Home Health And Postacute Care Use In Medicare Advantage And Traditional Medicare.医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中家庭健康及急性后护理的使用情况
美国县中癌症和痴呆共病老年患者住院的时空模式:2013-2018 年。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 May;43(5):601-611. doi: 10.1177/07334648231213747. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
The Relative Importance of Hospital Discharge and Patient Composition in Changing Post-Acute Care Utilization and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医院出院情况和患者构成在改变医疗保险受益人的急性后护理利用及结果方面的相对重要性。
Health Serv Insights. 2023 Apr 14;16:11786329231166522. doi: 10.1177/11786329231166522. eCollection 2023.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):837-842. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00844.
4
Trends in the Use of Skilled Nursing Facility and Home Health Care Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: An Interrupted Time-series Analysis.医院再入院减少计划下的熟练护理机构和家庭保健护理的使用趋势:一项中断时间序列分析。
Med Care. 2019 Oct;57(10):757-765. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001184.
5
Post-Acute Care After Joint Replacement in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.医疗保险捆绑支付改善计划中关节置换术后的康复护理。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1027-1035. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15803. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Two-Year Evaluation of Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement.强制性捆绑支付在关节置换方面的两年评估。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 17;380(3):252-262. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1809010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Discharge to Institutional Postacute Care: Interim Analysis of the First Year of a 5-Year Randomized Trial.强制性医疗保险捆绑支付计划,用于下肢关节置换和转至机构性康复治疗:一项 5 年随机试验的第一年中期分析。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):892-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12346.
8
Medicare Spending after 3 Years of the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共享储蓄计划实施 3 年后的医疗保险支出。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1139-1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1803388. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
10
Medicare ACO Program Savings Not Tied To Preventable Hospitalizations Or Concentrated Among High-Risk Patients.医疗保险 ACO 计划的节省与可预防的住院治疗无关,也没有集中在高风险患者中。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Dec;36(12):2085-2093. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0814.