• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在美国医院急诊部寻求治疗的无保险人群中的灾难性卫生支出。

Assessing Catastrophic Health Expenditures Among Uninsured People Who Seek Care in US Hospital-Based Emergency Departments.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 30;2(12):e214359. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4359. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4359
PMID:35977304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8796980/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Uninsured people uniquely rely on the emergency department (ED) for care as they are less likely to have access to lower-cost alternatives. Prior work has demonstrated that most uninsured patients are at risk of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) after being hospitalized for life-saving care. The risk of CHE for a single treat-and-release ED visit that does not result in a hospitalization among uninsured patient encounters is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the overall national risk of CHE among uninsured patients after a single treat-and-release ED visit from 2006 through 2017, and to characterize this risk across key traits.

DESIGN SETTING AND POPULATION

This cross-sectional study is based on a nationally representative sample of hospital-based ED visits between 2006 and 2017 in the United States (US) from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). It examined outpatient ED visits among uninsured patients.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Risk of CHE for ED care defined as an ED charge that exceeds 40% of one's estimated annual post-subsistence income.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2017, there were 41.7 million NEDS encounters that met inclusion criteria for this analysis, equating to a nationally weighted estimate of 184.6 million uninsured treat-and-release ED encounters over this period. The median ED charge for a single treat-and-release encounter grew from $842 in 2006 to $2033 by 2017. Approximately 1 in 5 uninsured patients (18% [95% CI, 18.0%-18.0%]) were at risk of CHE for a single treat-and-release ED visit over the study period. This estimated CHE risk increased from 13.6% (95% CI, 13.6%-13.6%) in 2006 to 22.6% (95% CI, 22.6%-22.7%) in 2017. Those living in the lowest income quartile faced a disproportionate share of this risk, with nearly 1 in 3 (28.5% [95% CI, 28.5%-28.6%]) facing CHE risk in 2017. In 2017, an estimated 3.2 million patient encounters nationally were at risk of CHE after a single treat-and-release ED visit.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional analysis from 2006 to 2017 of 184.6 million uninsured treat-and-release visits found that 1 in 5 uninsured patient encounters are at risk for CHE. This risk has grown over time. Future policies designed to improve access for unscheduled care must consider the unique role of the ED as the de facto safety net and ensure that uninsured patients are not at undue risk of financial harm for seeking care.

摘要

重要性

由于未参保人群获得低成本替代方案的机会较少,因此他们唯一依赖急诊部 (ED) 获得医疗服务。先前的研究表明,大多数未参保患者在因挽救生命而住院治疗后,都面临灾难性医疗支出 (CHE) 的风险。目前尚不清楚未参保患者单次接受治疗后即离院 (TREAT-AND-RELEASE) 的 ED 就诊,是否会导致 CHE。

目的

本研究旨在评估 2006 年至 2017 年期间,未参保患者单次接受治疗后即离院 (TREAT-AND-RELEASE) 的 ED 就诊的全国 CHE 总体风险,并对这一风险在关键特征上的表现进行描述。

设计、设置和人群:这是一项基于美国全国急诊部样本 (NEDS) 的全国代表性样本的横断面研究,研究对象为 2006 年至 2017 年期间在医院进行的 ED 就诊的未参保患者。研究人员分析了未参保患者的门诊 ED 就诊情况。

主要结局和测量指标

ED 治疗的 CHE 风险定义为 ED 费用超过估计的个人年度生存后收入的 40%。

结果

2006 年至 2017 年,NEDS 共纳入符合本分析标准的 4170 万例就诊,相当于同期全国范围内未参保患者 1.846 亿次 TREAT-AND-RELEASE ED 就诊的加权估计值。单次 TREAT-AND-RELEASE 就诊的 ED 费用中位数从 2006 年的 842 美元增加到 2017 年的 2033 美元。在研究期间,约有 1/5 的未参保患者 (18% [95% CI,18.0%-18.0%]) 存在单次 TREAT-AND-RELEASE ED 就诊的 CHE 风险。这一估计的 CHE 风险从 2006 年的 13.6% (95% CI,13.6%-13.6%) 增加到 2017 年的 22.6% (95% CI,22.6%-22.7%)。收入最低的四分之一人群面临着不成比例的风险,其中近 1/3 (28.5% [95% CI,28.5%-28.6%]) 在 2017 年面临 CHE 风险。2017 年,全国估计有 320 万例 ED 就诊存在 CHE 风险。

结论和相关性

本研究对 2006 年至 2017 年期间 1.846 亿次未参保 TREAT-AND-RELEASE 就诊进行了横断面分析,结果发现,1/5 的未参保患者就诊存在 CHE 风险。这一风险随着时间的推移而增加。未来旨在改善非计划性医疗服务获取机会的政策,必须考虑到 ED 作为事实上的安全网的独特作用,并确保未参保患者不会因寻求医疗服务而面临不必要的经济风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6844/8796980/5abc4c2810e6/jamahealthforum-e214359-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6844/8796980/6b523d2c7811/jamahealthforum-e214359-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6844/8796980/5abc4c2810e6/jamahealthforum-e214359-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6844/8796980/6b523d2c7811/jamahealthforum-e214359-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6844/8796980/5abc4c2810e6/jamahealthforum-e214359-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Catastrophic Health Expenditures Among Uninsured People Who Seek Care in US Hospital-Based Emergency Departments.评估在美国医院急诊部寻求治疗的无保险人群中的灾难性卫生支出。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 30;2(12):e214359. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4359. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Outcomes in patients visiting hospital emergency departments in the United States because of periodontal conditions.因牙周状况而到美国医院急诊部就诊的患者的治疗结果。
J Periodontol. 2011 Jun;82(6):809-19. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100228. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
3
US Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Discharges Among Uninsured Patients Before and After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.美国平价医疗法案实施前后,无保险患者在急诊就诊和出院情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192662. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2662.
4
Cured into Destitution: Catastrophic Health Expenditure Risk Among Uninsured Trauma Patients in the United States.治愈致贫:美国无保险创伤患者灾难性医疗支出风险。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jun;267(6):1093-1099. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002254.
5
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.美国农村和城市人口急诊就诊趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919.
6
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
7
Hospital-based emergency department visits with dental conditions among children in the United States: nationwide epidemiological data.美国儿童基于医院急诊科就诊的牙科疾病:全国性流行病学数据。
Pediatr Dent. 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):393-9.
8
Association Between Insurance Status and Access to Hospital Care in Emergency Department Disposition.保险状况与急诊科处置中获得医院护理的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):686-693. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0037.
9
Trends in US Emergency Department Use After Sexual Assault, 2006-2019.美国性侵后急诊就诊趋势,2006-2019 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2236273. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36273.
10
Variation in emergency department visit rates for opioid use disorder: Implications for quality improvement initiatives.阿片类物质使用障碍患者急诊就诊率的差异:对质量改进举措的启示
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.047. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Charity coverage and decreased COVID-19 mortality among uninsured patients in Texas: A retrospective cohort study.德克萨斯州未参保患者的慈善医保覆盖情况与新冠病毒疾病死亡率降低:一项回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0330533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330533. eCollection 2025.
2
Medicaid Enrollment After Hospital Presumptive Eligibility in the Emergency Department.急诊科医院推定资格后的医疗补助登记情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Apr 4;6(4):e250768. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0768.
3
Catastrophic health payments in Ghana post-National Health Insurance Scheme implementation: an analysis of service-specific health expenditures.

本文引用的文献

1
The Affordable Care Act Resurrected: Curtailing the Ranks of the Uninsured.《平价医疗法案》重生:缩减未参保人群数量
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1797-1798. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17531.
2
US Health Care Spending by Race and Ethnicity, 2002-2016.美国按种族和民族划分的医疗保健支出,2002-2016 年。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):649-659. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9937.
3
Implications of the 2020 Election for U.S. Health Policy.2020年美国大选对美国卫生政策的影响。
加纳实施国家医疗保险计划后的灾难性医疗支出:特定服务医疗费用分析
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 25;10(3):e018141. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018141.
4
Evaluating catastrophic health expenditures among patients with long bone fractures in Ghana's major teaching hospitals: a hospital-based analysis.评估加纳主要教学医院长骨骨折患者的灾难性医疗支出:基于医院的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12250-6.
5
Prevalence of Chronic Disease and Cost Effectiveness of a Free Clinic.慢性病的患病率及免费诊所的成本效益
J Community Health. 2025 Apr;50(2):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01417-7. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
6
Abdominal Ultrasonography Used for Abdominal Pain in the Rural Outpatient Setting of South Texas: Impact on Patient Outcomes.腹部超声检查在南德克萨斯农村门诊用于腹痛患者:对患者治疗结果的影响
Cureus. 2024 Jul 13;16(7):e64462. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64462. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Total and Out-of-Pocket Costs Surrounding Emergency Department Care Among Older Adults Enrolled in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.老年人在传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划下急诊护理的总费用和自付费用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Providing Equitable Healthcare Access for IBD in the Kentucky Appalachian Region.平价医疗法案对美国肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区提供 IBD 公平医疗服务的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Sep 1;66(9):1273-1281. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002942. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):e105. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2031592.
4
Catastrophic Health Expenditures Across Insurance Types and Incomes Before and After the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案实施前后,不同保险类型和收入人群灾难性医疗支出情况》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2017696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17696.
5
Financial Hardship, Healthcare Utilization, and Health Among U.S. Cancer Survivors.美国癌症幸存者的经济困难、医疗保健利用和健康状况
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.016.
6
Surprise Medical Bills, the High Cost of Emergency Department Care, and the Effects on Patients.意外医疗账单、急诊科护理的高昂成本及其对患者的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1457-1458. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3448.
7
Financial toxicity risk among adult patients undergoing cancer surgery in the United States: An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.美国接受癌症手术的成年患者的财务毒性风险:国家住院患者样本分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(3):397-406. doi: 10.1002/jso.25605. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
Prevalence and Correlates of Medical Financial Hardship in the USA.美国医疗财务困境的流行率和相关因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1494-1502. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05002-w. Epub 2019 May 1.
9
Association of Out-of-Pocket Annual Health Expenditures With Financial Hardship in Low-Income Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States.美国患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的低收入成年人中,年度自付医疗费用与经济困难的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):729-738. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1813.
10
Are trends in billing for high-intensity emergency care explained by changes in services provided in the emergency department? An observational study among US Medicare beneficiaries.急诊科提供服务的变化能否解释高强度急诊护理计费的趋势?一项针对美国医疗保险受益人的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019357.