From the School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Data and Digital Innovation, East Metropolitan Health Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Anesth Analg. 2022 Sep 1;135(3):586-591. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006133. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
Most patients transfused red blood cells in elective surgery receive small volumes of blood, which is likely to be discretionary and avoidable. We investigated the outcomes of patients who received a single unit of packed red blood cells during their hospital admission for an elective surgical procedure when compared to those not transfused.
This retrospective cohort study included elective surgical admissions to 4 hospitals in Western Australia over a 6-year period. Participants were included if they were at least 18 years of age and were admitted for elective surgery between July 2014 and June 2020. We compared outcomes of patients who had received 1 unit of red blood cells to patients who had not been transfused. To balance differences in patient characteristics, we weighted our multivariable regression models using the inverse probability of treatment. In addition to propensity score weighting, our multivariable regression models adjusted for hemoglobin level, surgical procedure, patient age, gender, comorbidities, and the transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma or platelets. Outcomes studied were hospital-acquired infection, hospital length of stay, and all-cause emergency readmissions within 28 days.
Overall, 767 (3.2%) patients received a transfusion of 1 unit of red blood cells throughout their admission. In the propensity score weighted analysis, the transfusion of a single unit of red blood cells was associated with higher odds of hospital-acquired infection (odds ratio, 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-5.20; P < .001). Patients who received 1 unit of red blood cells throughout their admission were more likely to have a longer hospital stay (rate ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.51-1.63; P < .001) and had 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20-1.69; P < .001) times higher odds of 28-day readmission.
These results suggest that avoidance of even small volumes of packed red blood cells may prevent adverse clinical outcomes. This may encourage hospital administrators to implement strategies to avoid the transfusion of even small volumes of red blood cells by applying patient blood management practices.
大多数在择期手术中接受输血的患者接受的红细胞体积较小,这些输血可能是随意的,也是可以避免的。我们调查了在择期手术住院期间接受 1 单位浓缩红细胞输血的患者与未输血患者的结局。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了西澳大利亚州 4 家医院在 6 年期间的择期手术入院患者。纳入标准为年龄至少 18 岁,且在 2014 年 7 月至 2020 年 6 月期间因择期手术入院。我们比较了接受 1 单位红细胞输血的患者与未输血患者的结局。为了平衡患者特征的差异,我们使用治疗的逆概率进行多变量回归模型的加权。除了倾向评分加权外,我们的多变量回归模型还调整了血红蛋白水平、手术程序、患者年龄、性别、合并症以及新鲜冷冻血浆或血小板的输注。研究的结局包括医院获得性感染、住院时间和 28 天内的全因急诊再入院。
总体而言,767(3.2%)例患者在整个住院期间接受了 1 单位的红细胞输血。在倾向评分加权分析中,输注 1 单位红细胞与更高的医院获得性感染几率相关(比值比,3.94;95%置信区间[CI],2.99-5.20;P<0.001)。接受 1 单位红细胞输血的患者住院时间更长(率比,1.57;95%CI,1.51-1.63;P<0.001),28 天内再入院的几率更高,为 1.42(95%CI,1.20-1.69;P<0.001)。
这些结果表明,即使避免少量浓缩红细胞也可能预防不良临床结局。这可能鼓励医院管理人员通过实施患者血液管理实践来避免输注甚至少量的红细胞,从而避免输注甚至少量的红细胞。