• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划性移除中心静脉导管(CVC)以预防血液病或自体干细胞移植患者的 CVC 相关血流感染:一项基于注册的随机模拟研究。

Scheduled removal of central venous catheters (CVC) to prevent CVC-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological disease or autologous stem cell transplantation: a registry-based randomized simulation-study.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Hematology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf (ABCD), Germany.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2022 Oct;101(10):2317-2324. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04958-w. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00277-022-04958-w
PMID:35978182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9463193/
Abstract

Although not generally recommended, scheduled central venous catheter (CVC) removal is sometimes carried out in order to reduce the CVC-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) incidence. We conducted a simulation for scheduled CVC removal within the multicenter CRBSI registry (SECRECY). Non-tunneled jugular and subclavian CVC in patients with hematological disease or with germ cell tumors (including patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation [SCT]) were included. Cases were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to either a simulated, scheduled CVC removal after 7, 14, and 21 days, or to non-simulated, unscheduled CVC removal (control group). The primary endpoint was definitive CRBSI incidence for a scheduled CVC removal after 14 days (dCRBSI-D14). Among other, secondary endpoints were definite CRBSI incidence for a scheduled removal after 7 days (dCRBSI-D7) and 21 days (dCRBSI-D21). Data on 2984 CVC were included. Patients' median age was 59 (range 16-95) years, 58.8% being male. The vast majority (98.4%) were patients with hematological malignancies. Jugular veins were the main insertion site (93.2%). dCRBSI-D14 was 3.10/1000 CVC days as compared to 4.15/1000 CVC days in the control group (p = 0.23). There was a significant difference between dCRBSI-D7 (0.86/1000 CVC days) and controls (p < 0.001), but not between dCRBSI-D21 (4.10/1000 CVC days) and controls (p = 0.96). Our data suggest that in patients with hematological diseases or autologous SCT recipients scheduled CVC removal after 14 days does not result in a lower CRBSI incidence compared to unscheduled removal.Trial registration: DRKS00006551, 2014/09/29, retrospectively registered.

摘要

虽然一般不建议这样做,但有时为了降低中心静脉导管(CVC)相关血流感染(CRBSI)的发生率,会进行计划的 CVC 拔除。我们在多中心 CRBSI 登记处(SECRECY)中进行了一项计划的 CVC 拔除模拟研究。该研究纳入了血液系统疾病或生殖细胞瘤患者(包括接受自体干细胞移植[SCT]的患者)的非隧道颈内和锁骨下 CVC。将病例以 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配至模拟的、计划在第 7、14 和 21 天进行的 CVC 拔除,或至非模拟的、非计划的 CVC 拔除(对照组)。主要终点为第 14 天(dCRBSI-D14)计划的 CVC 拔除后明确的 CRBSI 发生率。其他次要终点包括第 7 天(dCRBSI-D7)和第 21 天(dCRBSI-D21)计划的 CVC 拔除后明确的 CRBSI 发生率。共纳入了 2984 例 CVC。患者的中位年龄为 59 岁(范围 16-95 岁),58.8%为男性。绝大多数(98.4%)为血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。颈内静脉是主要的插入部位(93.2%)。dCRBSI-D14 为 3.10/1000 CVC 天,而对照组为 4.15/1000 CVC 天(p=0.23)。dCRBSI-D7(0.86/1000 CVC 天)与对照组之间存在显著差异(p<0.001),但 dCRBSI-D21(4.10/1000 CVC 天)与对照组之间无差异(p=0.96)。我们的数据表明,在血液系统疾病或自体 SCT 接受者中,与非计划拔除相比,计划在第 14 天进行的 CVC 拔除不会降低 CRBSI 的发生率。

临床试验注册号

DRKS00006551,2014 年 9 月 29 日, retrospectively registered。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4358/9463193/0f1f92c39657/277_2022_4958_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4358/9463193/189e3a24434c/277_2022_4958_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4358/9463193/0f1f92c39657/277_2022_4958_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4358/9463193/189e3a24434c/277_2022_4958_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4358/9463193/0f1f92c39657/277_2022_4958_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Scheduled removal of central venous catheters (CVC) to prevent CVC-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological disease or autologous stem cell transplantation: a registry-based randomized simulation-study.计划性移除中心静脉导管(CVC)以预防血液病或自体干细胞移植患者的 CVC 相关血流感染:一项基于注册的随机模拟研究。
Ann Hematol. 2022 Oct;101(10):2317-2324. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04958-w. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Chlorhexidine gluconate-coated gel pad dressings for prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic diseases or autologous stem cell transplantation: A registry-based matched-pair analysis.葡萄糖酸氯己定涂层凝胶垫敷料预防血液系统疾病或自体造血干细胞移植患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染的登记配对分析。
Eur J Haematol. 2023 Dec;111(6):914-921. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14098. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Impact of the insertion site of central venous catheters on central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with cancer: results from a large prospective registry.中心静脉导管置管部位对癌症患者中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的影响:一项大型前瞻性登记研究结果。
Infection. 2023 Aug;51(4):1153-1159. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02029-4. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
4
The insertion site is the main risk factor for central venous catheter-related complications in patients with hematologic malignancies.插入部位是血液恶性肿瘤患者中心静脉导管相关并发症的主要危险因素。
Am J Hematol. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):303-310. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26445. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
Effect of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections and mechanical complications.超声引导下中心静脉置管对导管相关血流感染和机械并发症发生率的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4487-0.
6
Sustained low incidence of central venous catheter-related infections over six years in a Swedish hospital with an active central venous catheter team.在瑞典的一家医院中,通过一支积极的中心静脉导管团队,六年来中心静脉导管相关感染的发生率持续较低。
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Feb;42(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.09.023.
7
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (TAURCAT Study) of Citrate Lock Solution for Prevention of Endoluminal Central Venous Catheter Infection in Neutropenic Hematological Patients.一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(TAURCAT 研究),评估柠檬酸锁溶液预防中性粒细胞减少性血液病患者中心静脉导管腔内感染的效果。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jan 27;64(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01521-19.
8
Maintenance antisepsis in reducing the rate of late-onset central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: A comparison of 0.05% and 1% chlorhexidine.维持抗菌减少迟发性中心静脉导管相关血流感染的发生率:0.05%和 1%洗必泰的比较。
J Infect Chemother. 2020 Feb;26(2):188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
9
Impact of a Best Practice Prevention Bundle on Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) Rates and Outcomes in Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patients in Inpatient and Ambulatory Settings.最佳实践预防套件对住院和门诊环境中儿科血液学、肿瘤学和造血细胞移植患者中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)率和结局的影响。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021 Jan;43(1):e64-e72. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001950.
10
Prediction of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients with haematologic malignancies using a modified Infection Probability Score (mIPS).使用改良感染概率评分(mIPS)预测血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CRBSIs)。
Ann Hematol. 2015 Sep;94(9):1451-6. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2387-y. Epub 2015 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing the need for scheduled replacement of short term central venous catheters: A narrative comprehensive review.重新评估短期中心静脉导管定期更换的必要性:一项叙述性综合综述。
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Nov 7;6(4):100420. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100420. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Use cases of registry-based randomized controlled trials-A review of the registries' contributions and constraints.基于注册的随机对照试验的应用案例——对注册研究的贡献和限制的回顾。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70072. doi: 10.1111/cts.70072.

本文引用的文献

1
Should central venous catheters be routinely replaced in adults?成人是否需要常规更换中心静脉导管?
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2021 Jul 2;82(7):1-2. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2020.0711. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Venous access devices for the delivery of long-term chemotherapy: the CAVA three-arm RCT.用于长期化疗的静脉通路装置:CAVA 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jul;25(47):1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta25470.
3
Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2020 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management, and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).
血液学和肿瘤学相关的中心静脉导管感染:感染性疾病工作组(AGIHO)更新的诊断、管理和预防指南,由德国血液学和肿瘤学学会(DGHO)制定。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Jan;100(1):239-259. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04286-x. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Influence of different definitions of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections on epidemiological parameters in cancer patients.中心静脉导管相关血流感染的不同定义对癌症患者流行病学参数的影响
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Apr;42(4):501-503. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.274. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: Comparison of data from a clinical registry and a randomized controlled trial.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染:临床登记数据与随机对照试验数据的比较
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;41(2):254-256. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.335.
6
Impact of neutropenia on central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies at the time of central venous catheter insertion: A matched-pair analysis.中性粒细胞减少对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中心静脉导管插入时中心静脉导管相关血流感染的影响:一项配对分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;40(10):1204-1206. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.224. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Complication and Failures of Central Vascular Access Device in Adult Critical Care Settings.成人重症监护环境中心血管通路装置的并发症和失败。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1998-2009. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003370.
8
Removal and insertion of central venous catheters in cancer patients is associated with high symptom burden.癌症患者中心静脉导管的移除和插入与高症状负担相关。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Aug;15(8):591-596. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1500892. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
Determination of a Cutoff Time Point for Prophylactic Exchange of Central Venous Catheters for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.确定血液系统恶性肿瘤患者预防性更换中心静脉导管的截止时间点以预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;38(7):888-889. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.92. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Feb;60(2):171-206. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2487-4.