From the Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany (SA-O, AISdO-S, NB); Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (SA-O, NM); Faculty of Health Sciences, Center of Physiotherapy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Malaysia (NM); Graduate Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil (AISdO-S); Post Graduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Methodist University of Piracicaba, UNIMEP, Piracicaba, Brazil (EMdC-C); and Clinical Research Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Maule, Talca, Chile (JF).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep 1;101(9):864-878. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001893. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
Bias is a systematic error that can cause distorted results leading to incorrect conclusions. Intervention bias (i.e., contamination bias, cointervention bias, compliance bias, and performance bias) and detection bias are the most common biases in rehabilitation research. A better understanding of these biases is essential at all stages of research to enhance the quality of evidence in rehabilitation trials. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide insights to the readers, clinicians, and researchers about contamination, cointervention, compliance, performance, and detection biases and ways of recognizing and mitigating them. The literature selected for this review was obtained mainly by compiling the information from several reviews looking at biases in rehabilitation. In addition, separate searches by biases and looking at reference lists of selected studies as well as using Scopus forward citation for relevant references were used.This review provides several strategies to guard against the impact of bias on study results. Clinicians, researchers, and other stakeholders are encouraged to apply these recommendations when designing and conducting rehabilitation trials.
偏倚是一种系统性误差,可能导致结果扭曲,从而得出错误的结论。在康复研究中,最常见的偏倚包括干预偏倚(即污染偏倚、混杂偏倚、依从性偏倚和实施偏倚)和检测偏倚。在康复试验的各个研究阶段更好地理解这些偏倚对于提高证据质量至关重要。因此,本叙述性综述旨在为读者、临床医生和研究人员提供有关污染、混杂、依从性、实施和检测偏倚的见解,以及识别和减轻这些偏倚的方法。这篇综述中选择的文献主要是通过编译来自几个关于康复偏倚的综述中的信息获得的。此外,还分别通过偏倚进行搜索,并查阅选定研究的参考文献列表,以及使用 Scopus 正向引文查找相关参考文献。本综述提供了一些策略来防止偏倚对研究结果的影响。鼓励临床医生、研究人员和其他利益相关者在设计和进行康复试验时应用这些建议。