• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与(而不是为)社区共同设计保护方案的五个心理学原则。

Five psychological principles of codesigning conservation with (not for) communities.

机构信息

Conservation Psychology Institute, Antioch University New England, Keene, New Hampshire, USA.

Science and Education Department, Alaska SeaLife Center, Seward, Alaska, USA.

出版信息

Zoo Biol. 2022 Sep;41(5):409-417. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21725. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1002/zoo.21725
PMID:35978562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9804877/
Abstract

A growing number of environmental professionals are realizing that equitable and meaningful engagement of local community members in the development of programming is essential for catalyzing the durable, long-term action needed to conserve wildlife. Many who attempt to codesign programs with (not for) communities find that choosing the most effective strategies to accomplish this task is crucial and can oftentimes feel daunting. In this paper, a validated psychometric instrument called the Five Factors of Sustained Engagement (Five Factors) was used to analyze community engagement projects from two AZA-accredited institutions, highlighting how the leaders of each project believe they have fostered each factor in their projects. Professionals can use the Five Factors as guideposts and evaluation criteria to increase the long-term motivation of community members to engage in conservation efforts over time. The discussion offers strategies that psychological research has shown to increase long-term motivation for wildlife conservation and suggest how to implement them in the codesign of conservation programming with the communities that are impacted by it the most. Together, this synthesis offers an innovative, psychology-based approach to fostering and evaluating the success of sustainable community engagement for conservation Wildlife conservation projects are rarely su long-term engagement from the humans who are most impacted by those projects.

摘要

越来越多的环境专业人士意识到,让当地社区成员公平、有意义地参与项目的制定,对于推动保护野生动物所需的持久、长期行动至关重要。许多人试图与社区共同设计方案,但他们发现选择最有效的策略来完成这项任务至关重要,而且往往令人望而生畏。在本文中,我们使用了一种经过验证的心理计量学工具,称为“持续参与的五个因素”(Five Factors),来分析来自两个 AZA 认可机构的社区参与项目,突出每个项目的领导者如何认为他们在项目中培养了每个因素。专业人士可以将五个因素用作指导方针和评估标准,以提高社区成员长期参与保护工作的积极性。讨论提供了心理研究表明可以增加野生动物保护长期动机的策略,并提出了如何在与受影响最大的社区共同设计保护项目时实施这些策略。总之,这种综合方法提供了一种创新的、基于心理学的方法,以促进和评估可持续社区参与保护的成功。野生动物保护项目很少能长期吸引受这些项目影响最大的人类的参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ad/9804877/1498ee217aa9/ZOO-41-409-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ad/9804877/cf54ab1d38ef/ZOO-41-409-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ad/9804877/c994a38b1ec8/ZOO-41-409-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ad/9804877/1498ee217aa9/ZOO-41-409-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ad/9804877/cf54ab1d38ef/ZOO-41-409-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ad/9804877/c994a38b1ec8/ZOO-41-409-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ad/9804877/1498ee217aa9/ZOO-41-409-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Five psychological principles of codesigning conservation with (not for) communities.与(而不是为)社区共同设计保护方案的五个心理学原则。
Zoo Biol. 2022 Sep;41(5):409-417. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21725. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Staff perceptions of COVID-19 impacts on wildlife conservation at a zoological institution.员工对 COVID-19 对动物园机构野生动物保护影响的看法。
Zoo Biol. 2022 May;41(3):234-243. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21669. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
3
Codesigning simulations and analyzing the process to ascertain principles of authentic and meaningful research engagement in childhood disability research.共同设计模拟并分析过程,以确定儿童残疾研究中真实且有意义的研究参与原则。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 9;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00398-y.
4
Codesigning person-centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study.与多元化社区共同设计以人为本的质量指标:一项定性的患者参与研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2188-2202. doi: 10.1111/hex.13388. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
5
Conservation psychology strategies for collaborative planning and impact evaluation.保护心理学策略在协作规划和影响评估中的应用。
Zoo Biol. 2022 Sep;41(5):425-438. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21692. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
6
Mobonda Community Conservation Project: Chimpanzees, oysters, and community engagement in Sierra Leone.蒙博达社区保护项目:塞拉利昂的黑猩猩、牡蛎与社区参与
Am J Primatol. 2021 Apr;83(4):e23219. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23219. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
7
Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration.与弱势和处境不利人群共同设计卫生和其他公共服务:国际合作的见解。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):284-297. doi: 10.1111/hex.12864. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
8
Beyond inspiration: Translating zoo and aquarium experiences into conservation behavior.超越启发:将动物园和水族馆的体验转化为保护行为。
Zoo Biol. 2022 Sep;41(5):398-408. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21716. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
9
ZATPAC: a model consortium evaluates teen programs.ZATPAC:一个模型联盟评估青少年项目。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Sep;28(5):429-46. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20203.
10
Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.融入研究协同设计知识与实践:来自澳大利亚一家新研究机构研究人员的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Simplifying drone-based aboveground carbon density measurements to support community forestry.简化基于无人机的地上碳密度测量以支持社区林业。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0322099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322099. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Making a case for the consideration of trust, justice and power in conservation relationships.论证在保护关系中考虑信任、正义和权力的必要性。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb 24;36(4). doi: 10.1111/cobi.13903.
2
Introduction: New directions in conservation psychology at a critical time.引言:在关键时期保护心理学的新方向。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Dec;34(6):1335-1338. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13629.